Member Info for WG818

BV
I would suggest you actually read the 2014 and the Aecom one from earlier this monthThe DB levels are models from the nearest properties.

Do you think they will continue with the works now they don’t have the necessary PP in place or just carry on regardless?

Yanis

I suggest you have a look at the 2014 Saltfleetby Acoustic report! Far more comprehensive as is the rest of the application.

BV…..lol …you do realise what you just called yourself!

Obviously you are caught in the HITS lobster pot but please try an stay polite.

Cudd/ech/Clare….So we are now tree hugging, local activists. Who all have ties to a Scottish investor who all work foe bering*** and are all shorting ?

We all know come the end of Jan a raise is nailed on….blame the BOD and yourself for your losses not yet another made up pantomime villain!

Hold on to your hats regarding the EA/CC and the noise issue. A previous PP had a 37db limit embossed. The recent Aecom report looks to be on and above that limit and doesn’t include the noise generated from existing site that it says has complaints against it.

Of course the obvious elephant in the room you’re all conveniently missing is that they don’t have the required planning permission to be carrying most of the civil works out.
A case officer has been allocated and consultations have now been sent out.

Dear me cudd/ echo / Clair/ the other 2 identities you recently posted as.
The EA Brockham document is just another nail in the coffin.
Both the EA and the council haven’t/won’t give permission to inject water from anywhere. That’s the only way they will be able to bring the pressure back up to make it anywhere near commercial!
Lidsey also got a smack round the face as it now doesn’t have anywhere to dispose of its 1/3 water cut.. not that it matters as it hasn’t produced anything for almost 2 years now!

You even have the nerve to re-post that rubbish that was deleted earlier under your new name.

Again Market Abuse….look it up!

Mmm. So they knew they had to apply for fresh planning permission on The 2nd November according to the Aecom documents submitted.
Yet they still issued an RNS with The end of February for first gas knowing they didn’t have the PP required in place and have had a new acoustic report this month and increased the size of the flare to the size of a three story building!
If I had taken part in that placing I would be pretty upset that this material information wasn’t disclosed.
Any works that now take place won’t have the required PP in place and the EA will surely now have to start again on that application with the new information.

BV
Best you take issue with the companies own interpretation then!
Of course it also means that Brockham now won’t be able to raise the pressure using the up-to 150 barrels a day required from Lidsey.

BV
Technology moves on! Geological rock formations don’t!

Bridgedogg1

Angus Energy has permission to handle radioactive material from Brockham. But the new permit would not allow it to receive radioactive waste water from Lidsey or other sites.

Surrey County Council has confirmed that Angus Energy also does not have planning permission to accept waste from other sites.

BV
And Angus itself I believe!

BV
Geology and historical records!

Charles2
Enhancing a plan? Have a look back on Twitter! It’s always been the plan!
As for good news for Lidsey! How is being refused permission to inject its £49 a barrel injection water at Brockham good news? It means it would need its own injector well and the costs involved. Just for clarification that would need EA approval and we know how long that takes!

HITS
They have know about the changes for months if not a year. The picture from the CPR clearly shows that the original Planning Permission was obsolete.
I have a suspicion that they are trying to sneak this through on the quiet.
BV
The original permission was incredibly modest in scale. The new plans show it as it was always going to have to be. A mini Threadneedlethorpe production facility. It’s hardly just a couple of engine’s and a few bits of kit and a storage tank now is it? The flare is huge! Not very rural!
This will undoubtably get permission but Angus should have submitted this months ago.
If it requires a screening report due to the increased size all bets are of for timescales.

Just posted elsewhere

The trouble they have here is that they managed to get the original approval via a kind of loophole being that AECOM said the original permission kind of granted them permission to turn it into a production facility. Obviously, with only six bits of kit showing on the original approved plans, the Planning officer didn't have much of an issue. The new plans as I pointed out when the CPR was published have over 30 now showing and the size of the site now truly turning into an industrial-size undertaking.

The size of the development could well now need a screening report and should be sent to the planning committee for a decision.

The new flare stack is not the one that the EA thinks so that is also going to cause issues.

Brockham

This has just actually been given a death sentence as the only way they could make it (and Lidsey for that matter) commercial was to inject the Lidsey water to bring the pressure back up. Lidsey likewise just had a major setback as it would now require its own injector well to dispose of the wastewater.

Those groundwork’s are 8 miles away at the other end of the pipeline BV!!
Should have been finished 14 months ago!!

Welcome Back”CLARE” …….you must think we are and Admin are all thick….cudd/ech/ whatever this morning’s name was that’s gone alert!!…..let me guess, your Twitter name is”lady of aim”
Market manipulation, look it up!!

Mmmm….. what the hell did that workover reveal last week?

Double agent.

Yes that’s why I pointed to the CPR for figures. It gives you a precise breakdown! I’m sure you will have looked back at the monthly running costs and come to a similar figure!