Member Info for WeTookPelham

88k buy at 5.65, maybe they know something ;)
But a '1' trade, a moon party Friday ramp post and even nom thinking there should be some ramping! That's given me a much needed cheering up :)

But joking aside, as moon party says:
"mAbs deal? Covidity funding? SCIB1 patient dosed? Black Swan?"
Lots and lots of significant news due.

I don't care if it's just a myth or someone having fun, i still love seeing that trade :)

https://www.investegate.co.uk/oxford-biomedica-plc/rns/director-dealings---market-share-purchase/202007021539489022R/

Or perhaps not?

HI @c7, I was trying to stay away from the topic of the Parliamentary Science & Tech Committee as it gets me too wound up! But we posted about this yesterday and to uses Inans words (i paraphrase):
"Nothing but advertising, showboating, congratulating themselves for their "amazing acheivement"... Labours Dawn Butler most pertinent question was challenging the GOV Advisors .. on "language"!

Basically as far as i know no real mention of funding(?), Sir John(?), the Canadian guy was the only impartial one their saying betting on just two vaccines was a risk and talked about importance of T-cells, but on both oocasaions the coversation wasn't reciprocated/came to an abrupt end.

As far as i could tell no one questioned about other projects or how Oxford/imperial was validated/selected/panel reviewd or more importanty how it was funded. It was IMO just a big indulgent back slapping session, almost solely focused on Oxford and it's production. I'm fairly sure other vaccines/projects weren't even properly mentioned? @LL may know better.

But can anyone tell me if the government/UKRI have providedn funding to other projects outside of Oxford/Imperial yet? I have a feeling there was a small list (i.e. edinburgh uni) but the amounts were piffling in comparison.

Ah, that explains it:
"Data sourced from FasterCures, a center of the Milken Institute."

The Milken Institute has some interesting pages:
https://milkeninstitute.org/
https://milkeninstitute.org/centers/fastercures
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6167838590001#sp=show-clips

I posted yesterday that the Milken Institute had recognised the Nottigham/Scancell vaccine, well found this:
https://www.covid-19vaccinetracker.org/

Also on here, but seems to be exactly the same page as the milken one, so perhaps sharing of resources? Or this site has cheekily pinched the Milken page? Anyway nice to know it's getting out there.

Hi Botski
This was discussed on the 23rd June, heres the thread:

https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=SCLP&share=Scancell-Holdings&thread=5088ABBC-15F0-47AE-80FB-7C402304F354

"crumbs
Posts: 14,817
Price: 5.70
RE: Interesting Tweet from a Nottingham Uni student.23 Jun '20
Yeah is it 15 lab staff we have?..... I forget off my head but some of them are ex-students and possibly for social distancing purposes some of the less senior and vital staff have not been in the labs since lockdown... You would think if there was a real effect on scancells operations we would have had an RNS and we didn't no we got an RNS saying they were busy working on a Covid vaccine lol

ReplyRecommend (3)Report Post
WeTookPelham
Posts: 1,250
Price: 5.70
RE: Interesting Tweet from a Nottingham Uni student.23 Jun '20
Yeah good point RE an RNS about the covid impact on operations. And I guess this student wouldn't neccasarily know or be privvy to info about who was using the labs during lockdown.
As you were."

https://www.ouh.nhs.uk/about/trust-board/2018/may/documents/TB2018.51a-appendix-1.pdf
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8326429/UKs-antibody-testing-fiasco-exposed-PHE-test-misses-cases.html

IMO...conflicts of interest all over the shop!

Sorry replied to the wrong thread:

"IMO this is basically just tributes and adulations to (former Oxford alumini) Kate Bingham and Oxfords Professor Sarah Gilbert.

Where's the perntinent, probing questions? A total shower of shi... IMO."

IMO this is basically just tributes and adulations to (former Oxford alumini) Kate Bingham and Oxfords Professor Sarah Gilbert.

Where's the perntinent, probing questions? A total shower of shi... IMO.

Seems like an Oxford vaccine whitewash, self congratulatory back slapping session IMO???
As I've kept on saying there seems to be some kind of obvious bias on Oxford and Imperial, everything else is just froth?
P.s. the American is the only one who seems remotley impartial and talking - he mentioned not betting all on the big two as it's a risk.

Hence my question LL RE who's taking part? Seems anything but impartial??

Is there a full list of the people taking part?

Being quoted 5.725 for just 4k shares....mmm

Top doom mongering crackster ;)

I presume this date isn't set in stone? But interesting that it hasn't come out this morning?

LimpDickPullar?

Top doom mongering DP ;)

That article again, as it's so damning IMO:

https://www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-politics-whitehall-2020-6-mystery-over-who-approved-126m-vaccine-investment/

@crumbs
"Except there was supposed to be! ... Seems it all went 'self interest' and tribal very fast... Will we ever get to know who it was that decided the UK vaccine was going to be the 2 it is going to be .... probably not an independent scientific board.... possibly just some connected bloke"

Basically what I've been harping on about for ages!
P.S. I think that "bloke" is Cummings IMO