Member Info for WeTookPelham

@c7 - you've summed up Frankie FactTwisters modus operandi in one post. Bravo.
:)

Half-Truth Harry/Limpbizkit - "Vulpes sold down a tiny proportion of their holding in scancell. Fact." - is that what you meant to say but got lost in translation?

"...There's enough of serious interest to watch and consider now, without falling for Knowlesi's strangely revitalised efforts to sow half-truths and dissent. Back under your rock now Knowlesi, there's a good boy."

You'd think a excellent RNS like today would make shareholders happy, but they seem to make Knowi angry... I can't work out why?
P.s. Knowi is it ok if we can call one of these nicknames? - "LimpBizkit", "Half-Truth Harry","Frankie FactTwister"??? You can choose.

Hey DP, what happened to your relatively neutral stance here? Just curious.

"...a licensing deal with some upfront cash on any one of the platforms would be transformational. I agree that Scancell do not have the resources or capacity to take a product all the way to market themselves, but to be fair I don't think that was ever their ambition."

@konarA - just for fun (or should I say speculation ;)), with todays RNS in mind which meant lots of t's were crossed and i's were dottted, how soon could a licensing deal now happen?

Is everyone missing my Scancell RNS post? Lol.

https://www.investegate.co.uk/scancell-hlds--sclp-/rns/new-publication-highlights-potential-of-modi-1/202006240700058576Q/

Yeah good point RE an RNS about the covid impact on operations. And I guess this student wouldn't neccasarily know or be privvy to info about who was using the labs during lockdown.
As you were.

Thanks crumbs. But doesn't that tweet imply Scancell, in fact no-one using the labs at Nottingham uni up until now (this week), but as mentioned wasnt' the Sky news report recorded there about 3 weeks ago?

https://twitter.com/_griffx/status/1275485205160230912

"Griff Crescent moon
@_griffx
Replying to
@SallyOsw
Awh good! Hopefully you’re back soon. We’ve had Scancell the company go back this week, so I think they are our guinea pigs. our new institute is 800+ people from 5 different schools so it’s taken a lot of coordinating xx
"
"Griff Crescent moon
@_griffx
·
1h
It’s been 100 days since I was last in the lab. 100 days since me or my colleagues have been able to do cancer research. We can go to bloody primark, watch a movie and get our hair cut. But important, life saving medical research still can’t happen. Madness."

Appears she's a University of Nottingham Student studing Medicine/Cancer. Obviously can only take this on face value but wasnt the Sky news article recorded at Nottingham Uni?
Daft question but are Scancells labs located on University grounds?
Interesting nevertheless?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/23/covid-19-vaccine-may-not-work-for-at-risk-older-people-say-scientists

Ermm...

Great find/investigation as ever KonarA.

Your quote... "Anyway, for those that though the formal granting of the application may have been catalyst for commercial action, then that granting is seemingly now going ahead."
...Very encourouging! Where you say "then that granting is seemingly now going ahead." do you mean this is a formality i.e the next logical stage of the patetnt process, or is there something stating this?

Interesting...
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-06-class-precision-medicine-cancer-dna.html
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.19.02404

Flip-Flop(py) is back! ;)

@bunsie "...Can you think of any positives? go on dig deep there must be some?"

@bunsie - if Scancell had the cure to every single disease, the answer to free energy/perpetual motion etc, i feel RR would criticise regardless, just IMO, feel free to correct me @RR. There's balanced debates and then theirs nit-picking/doom mongering,...again all IMO.

Interestingly something @RW and @C7 ( i think) said, a few of us noticed a distinct and abrupt change in tone, DickPullar for one. And the fact we're seeing a sudden increase in volume, and big late reported buys last few days (2 x 250k again tonight after hours).

Also, whilst I'm certainly no chartist, we can see the chart is shaping up quite similar to just before the Covid RNS, a tight bollinger squeeze - ranging very tightly, a golden cross, a very interesting ichumoku cloud - almost vertical (any actual expert please feel free to correct me on these)

Basically it "feels" like news could be coming, and very soon, and the price could spike. Now weather that's up or down is anyones guess! (Plus a proper RNS or two is due - SN11, trial news, avidimab contracts etc)

I think the doom mongers (and credit to them), now how to trade the share well and see the trading patterns way better than us LTH, hence maybe why all the sudden doom mongering? Hence why the big volume lately? Maybe they see something coming? And as we see it doesn't take much buying and selling to affect the price atm, so a few negative comments on the board might help the traders gameplan? Again, all IMO. And as i always say...what the hell do I know!

Good find Inan, so we know then that Merck want therapeutic DNA vaccines for keytruda combinations, they've ticked off one used for HPV-induced cancers...why would that be? As in why HPV? You'd think they'd be looking to tick off/acquire DNA vaccines used for the more common cancers too, you'd assume?

Yes noticed that too, how significant is that?Also noticed it referred to some individuals as belonging specifically and only to "Biodiscovery Institute, University of Nottingham"

Aren't they part of the covid vaccine work?

This looks new?
https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/1/e000560.info

Publication history
Accepted April 26, 2020
First published June 18, 2020.
Online issue publication
June 18, 2020

Ciaskin, to save my searching through lots of posts, can your re=paste your original letter you sent to your MP. Thanks.
Oh and well done for doing it.

Agree FTSEbuyer, they don't seem to know how to maximize promotion, it's only very recently this changed with the covid19 project but that's a slightly different project. But with the core platforms, yes IMO they are poor at getting the word out, especially considering how good they are.

IMO this is how you word an RNS:
https://www.investegate.co.uk/tiziana-life-sciences--tils-/gnw/tiziana-granted-first-ever-patent-on-a-transformational-technology-for-oral-delivery-of-all-anti-cd3-monoclonal-antibodies-for-treatment-of-human-diseases/20200619070010H7770/