Member Info for wasit10538

And it will be an even longer 2 years for UKOG.

Remember what Paul Vonk said that HH1 was never drilled as a Kimmeridge producer, Brockham is and will be in production before Xmas.

So that's a pint of bitter for Lovejoy and a bottle of champagne for the rest of us.

Try practicing what you preach first DHC and then your plea would seem a little more sincere.

Logging Engineer, that's a fancy name for a Lumberjack :)

The bushman can pack up their bags and go home now as the production and testing numbers will drive the narrative and not their selective reporting.

If you can't fix it,hit it with a big hammer.

A report from forth that the site is very busy and noisy today.

Also good to know that senility hasn't set in yet:)

Morning youngba,I know that Paul Vonk said that in a interview that I have heard recently but I'm damned if I can find it now,his reply to a question about transport and excessive production at Brockham was something like " We will look at the possibility of a rail head at Brockham."

What will be really fulfilling for me will be the combined proof from Balcombe, Brockham and Horse Hill that the "experts" got it so wrong. I like it when all knowing experts are proved fallible,and their title temporarily drops and exposes them as all too human.

These posts are on the wrong BB Willow pillow,try the UKOG BB.

Paul Vonk said Inthe interview with Zac that a rail head to Brockham would be considered if bopd were excessive,no details though.

I had an open offer when Bergen were selling and took full advantage of it and filled my boots as the saying goes.

What a surprise eh,DHC leaving his beloved UKOG board to uurge investors to vote against the Placing,I wonder why?
" If resolutions 1 and 2 are not passed at the GM,the Placing will not proceed and the Company will not receive the net proceeds of the Placing,with the result that the Companys business plans, growth, prospects and available working capital will be materially adversely affected."
So here we are about to flow Brockham and pi's are seriously suggesting that we should deny the Company the finance to advance the production capabilities at Brockham! Any investor voting against this placing at this vital stage needs their head examining.

It's just so sad and demeaning for the poster when they have to resort to these undignified tactics to try and shore up their investment of which they are sooo confident. Time to concentrate on the operations at Brockham which ultimately will be good for UKOG shareholders.

It always surprises me how quickly operations move with Angus once they begin, RNS this week?

13/6/18
From Oliver Craven
To David Maxwell
Subject Brockham Wellsite Transport Movements
" Prior to the evaluation of the well taking place it is however IMPOSSIBLE ( my capitals ) to give a definitive number of actual HGV movements."

JBG,yes Angus do expect to flow oil for some months unaided by a pump. I

Well spotted Wolf,so Mr £1.00 a share for UKOG by Xmas 2016 is back even though banned by LSE lol,and he has the cheek to warn of ramping posters ha,ha. I suppose he thought that he could slip in unnoticed with all the new posters on this BB.