Member Info for Washers

String of 50k buys followed by a few 100k buys. spread 5.10-5.20

GLA

Multiple 50k share buys at 5.1 now 5.19 to buy

GLA holders

LOL NOPE

GLA

Nope read the 2nd RNS Holding RNS is An event changing the breakdown of voting rights
NOT
an acquisition or disposal of voting rights.

GLA

Holding RNS is An event changing the breakdown of voting rights so not an acquisition or disposal of voting rights. This RNS is routine due to the increase in company shares to 396 million IMO

GLA

Could it be a reduced percentage due to increased shares?

GLA

Great to see AAOG getting attention for the right reasons and swiftly moving back up.

GLA holders

Another good size buy 414k shares at 4.15p and a buy full ask at 4.2p
Let’s hope we can more back up

GLA

There are so many incorrect statements in your post it's ridiculous. Almost total fiction to the facts and the current position AAOG are in.

Angela if you need to carry on this discussion please respond using the same thread as I will correct the vast majority of your statements throughout the day.

GLA

There appears to be some confusion which is not surprising to be honest but on this occasion DS is fighting for what is right, what he and AAOG believe they are entitled to due to the condition ETC of the SMP rig.
AAOG has well documented the issues with the rig and having attempted negotiations with SMP and getting no response are doing the right thing.

DS is a legal expert and clearly believes legally AAOG are entitled to compensation.

GLA

My point here is simple if AAOG got a rig from somewhere else then we would continue as discussed. This RNS DOES NOT delay anything.

GLA

1. Yes we produce and sell oil every day
2. £2.5m secured further being negotiated
3. Letter confirming 25 year licence negotiating finer points.
4. Monthly payment plan last was the highest so far $800k
5. The background would suggest different but have to agree need to improve.
6. Share price does not stop fundraising.
7. Agree although not cheap does seem to much

GLA

YinYang If you do not understand the RNS please ask a question rather than making inaccurate statements. The supervised mediation is Autumn however.

The Company is seeking the revocation of the order at a hearing in Pointe Noire this week on several grounds including that the equipment and oil at the site is the joint property of SPNC, the Government (in the case of the oil) and the Company, and therefore has been wrongfully seized. The judgment of the court may take a few days to be delivered. The Company has been advised that its application for the revocation of the order has merit.
This order has had no impact on the operations of the Company.
o The order is over the Company's fixed assets (which are jointly owned by the Company and SNPC, the state oil company) and crude in tank (which is jointly owned by the Company, SNPC and the Government) at Tilapia.
o The order has no impact on the Company's licence.
o The Company maintains limited cash balances in the Congo and the blocking of one of its accounts there has had no operational impact.

GLA

YinYang That's correct so why state 'are the IIs still interested in investing at 5.2p' when that is confirmed in a RNS at least you have corrected your earlier post.

GLA

YinYang If you do not believe the recently confirmed investors at 5.2p weren't aware of this, which was highlighted earlier as a rumbling before the release of RNS then I have to say this shows how naive and out of your depth you are.

GLA

Yin Yang. I could say NOMAD getting everything in order for a takeover. That would be as pathetic as your post

GLA

SMP has not launched any claim or counterclaim against the Company.

The Seizure order is in retaliation to AAOG withholding $650. This will be sorted by mediation IMO

GLA

Wrong it is AAOG taking legal action against SMP

GLA

Well done DS clearly with his background and advice from the International Counsel this was the correct stance by AAOG

SMP has not launched any claim or counterclaim against the Company.

SMP has now retaliated by seeking a seizure order.

AAOG is on the front foot here IMO

GLA

Did you read this part?

The granting of this order has no bearing on the merits of the claim launched in Paris.

· The Company is seeking the revocation of the order at a hearing in Pointe Noire this week on several grounds including that the equipment and oil at the site is the joint property of SPNC, the Government (in the case of the oil) and the Company, and therefore has been wrongfully seized. The judgment of the court may take a few days to be delivered. The Company has been advised that its application for the revocation of the order has merit.

GLA