Member Info for Warrie

thanks for the link it took me to some older news from proactives interview with strategic minerals executive director peter wale and dennis rowland, project manager at subsidiary cornwall resources.

any new investors may want to see this , it willl give you some idea about how big this area is and the license agreement.

https://*********************/media/strategic-minerals-and-cornwall-resources-secure-groundbreaking-deal-with-duchy-of-cornwall/id/20409

Suddenly the focus is all about Thursday and then the narrative is twisted around to " what if there is no news".

It's called conditioning investors for bad news that hasn't even happened, just a manufactured scenario to suit the timing so they can grab more cheap shares.

Remember who started this rumour , I am betting more of them will saturate this board leading up to Thursday, Slags they are.

A bit of profit taking, that's normal. Followed by the mm's antics to take the opportunity to bring the S.P down , that's usual. Then the usual pattern to put more downward pressure on the S.P. send in the clowns to disrupt the relative calm of the board.

Seen it all before , I will now slip away before one of them attempts to shake my hand with a electrically charged gloved puppet. Will be back tomorrow if there is anything newsworthy.

Actually OAF is not on the shelves where I live because as soon as they get stock it's gone 🤣

Gingy,

I can only assume silence to my question you are not local to the area.

I was born in Devon have lived here for 68 years, in my 30's slept in the cottage next to the Hemerdon Mine, I regularly holiday in Cornwall there is a certain feel to the place when you cross the Tamar bridge, I would say the coastline is breathtaking, rugged and wild in winter and the land around certain high reaches of both Devon and Cornwall can be barren, sparse and feel unwelcoming, so your concerns are unfounded regarding environmental issues because there are strict procedures nowadays. Impact on local people would be positive with job creation , the moorland areas are bleak and rugged, mining has very little impact on ruining the landscape , it's hardly the South Hams which is an area of outstanding natural beauty.

The whole of the Tamar Valley could have more valuable minerals , besides Redmoor at Kelly bray and Hemerdon , just up the road linking Hemerdon to Wotter there is China Clay, the distance between all these mines is 20 miles, anywhere between Callington to Gunnislake there could be more previous metals.

Gingy

One question to you, do you live in the Tamar Valley area?

If you do not , then you are way out of your depth on what the locals would feel about the potential for high paid jobs.

I had a friend many years ago in the late 70's who's family owned land adjacent to Hemerdon. They said one day they will want to mine the gun ball metal that is sitting here. Well it happened and I think it was Wolf Mining that started it up , there business model failed because they spent £200 m building a full-scale plant upfront. A brand new road was also built adding to the overall huge outlay before production and Wolf’s failure was largely metallurgical; it designed its plant for wolframite recovery, but Hemerdon’s ore is mainly ferberite. Tungsten and Tin prices were also falling at this crucial point in the businesses development.

Tungsten west picked up the full plant ,new infrastructure for 3-5 million.

A crucial differentiator.

Hemerdon’s waste rock is a premium aggregate product (low alkali-silica reactivity).

Tungsten West is building an aggregates business to sell 3–5 Mtpa of construction stone to UK infrastructure projects.

This provides steady GBP cash flow independent of tungsten prices.

The company has called it a “dual-stream model”:

“The tungsten-tin mine underpins long-term value, while the aggregates division provides near-term revenue and cash generation.”

So once more Ginge are you local?

Consolidation is welcome?

That translates to me like " I don't like what they did there but to save my embarrassment of still wanting to believe this untrustworthy BOD I will go along with it and convince others it is not a bad move"

Fact Consolidation 90% of the time does not end well for investors. Those invested will put up strong arguments it will attract institutions , deter day traders.

Here is an example of blind faith, CapAI did a recent 100 -1 share swap, all invested there said the same as the cheerleaders in here.

Immediately after the Consolidation the share drifted from 2.84 to 1.92 any little increases on a daily basis are immediately wiped out by heavy selling as investors look to cut and run.

I am not deramping this , just pointing out what is more likely to happen, I hope for the sake of those invested you get the most positive of assay results to off set this boards mismanagement, only time will tell.

Warrants are the new raise, the result is the same ,..dilution, warrants sounds better than raise.

CapAi, diluted after share price dropped from warrants issued

HE1, death spiral after warrants issued.

Caledonia Holdings,..say no more, investors won't get money back

Defence Holdings , the best investment with realistic plans as part of our M.o.D structure ,still plummeted after warrant issues.

Investors do not like warrants and will pull money out to protect their gains and then reinvest when they feel they are at the bottom of the dip.

"So what do they know over there that we don’t?"

We have been listed there less than a month so I think someone has spotted a bargain and this is just the start, it will gain traction.

It is so easy to fall back into the trap of thinking that after we had the big drop (due to the warrants and other shenanigans) we have all invested in another London stock market dog.

Look at the EOD trades , it will reassure you that holding is clever, selling is stupid.

I am personally grateful for the stupid because they create the liquidity we need to move up, not that they are getting any financial kick backs from me when this explodes,.. not even a cheerio or good riddance, they deserve to lick their wounds from their losses because they are out of their depth and should never have put money in here in the first place.

Remember the market works only because of this stupidity,.. without them we would have no winners.

I know that road very well and it is a decent road all the way to Saltash, once across the Tamar Bridge the route to Tungsten Wests Hemerdon mine is straightforward up the expressway and off the top end of Plympton, they've even built a new road for the mine at Hemerdon so access is easy.

JamesTrader,

Going to put your theory to rest. Been watching your over ramping exploits for a while and if I was still invested here I would have filtered you by now.

There will be no herd rushing in to buy here until revenues are generated.

The OTC will not be your saviour, as in Defence Holdings , which has been up and running about a month now the interest is tepid to luke warm.

If any of Ronjons projects go live in the near future they will need to be instant successes, that probability is low.

If even one of his projects has moderate returns it will only cover partial running costs.

If one of his projects is a instant hit, you will be reliant on word getting out creating momentum and sentiment and many of the folk underwater here will feel relief at breaking even and will jump ship.

That could cause a violent reaction in the S.P. dropping as more warrants will be issued and further fund raising will be inevitable.

There is no get rich quick solution with all these new fangled ideas that pop up in Ronjons head, they are at the mercy of market sentiment until proven to be useful to consumers, but they then need to be better than the competition to succeed.

What a joke this is, Consolidation coming your way and that will leave many of you nursing huge losses in the long term , enjoy

so many big bull **** comments in here, i hold this xxx ,i have xxx many shares. genuine holders who have smaller investments are far more grounded.

no one cares how many shares you think you have or how much money you say you have invested,..it really all comes down to,. is there enough gold in the ground for everyone invested to make some returns.

so stop trying to be clever with your false persona's, i have this and that ,.because you have no more than anyone else at this stage of investing in wsbnn

Hippy

I have better things to be doing than checking out social media , this board is about as much as I can be asked with other than doing serious research on my investments.

If it was posted I LinkedIn I wouldn't have known , my phone and P. C. are not set up so I become a slave to every websites tweets or notifications.

Ralph

Your everywhere dude, do you actually have time to take a crap.

TKW

You shouldn't believe everything , this is the internet, smoke and mirrors.

Different rules need to be applied here.

I said earlier I would check for news and any further developments was a bit surprised to then see tge RNS.

Better board today so happy to engage.

P S. Play nicely TWK I think your better than the one I witnessed yesterday.

It's comical reading at times when the market monkey minnions are unleashed .

Their ill informed postings easily spotted by those who have researched everything associated with Defence Holdings and Whitespace.

For new investors I would suggest reading back through all the RNS'S from when ALRT first listed.

Get yourselves up to date and understand what we have here, it will negate any posts that attempt to cast doubt.

This share is unique, there is literally nothing quite like it on the stock market and all kinds of games have been played to deter people from buying in.

The trolls in desperation have been helped by some brokers refusal to sell ALRT shares, I have my own theory on why that has happened. All I know from experience is when the volatility increases the mm's do their usual flash crash shenanigans and those weak hands lose money. Because believe me when I say the deliberate crashes are followed up with a period of book filling that locks you out of opportunity to buy cheap.

The book filling being applied is in my opinion a "special arrangement" for the V.I.P's that missed the boat.

Yes it's not a fair World we live in , we spot an undervalued company with potential and grab all the cheap shares, they cry 'foul ref" and the brokers run to their assistance to redress the terrible unjust actions of the private investors who should not be allowed to get away with such despicable good fortune.

HODL don't let them have your shares on the cheap.

It fascinates me how in the space of half an hour we have a totally different board atmosphere.

I never understood the sheep mentality during covid and I still don't get it now.

Try and have a bit more faith and patience and you may well be rewarded

You can't quote M.o.D. and NATO if your some ponzi set up , you would be banged to rights and in deep poo if you did.

Next time the S.P. stalls and the trolls arrive please ignore, chill and remember why you invested here.

I dropped this question into chatgpt and not surprising here is the response.

ChatGPT said:

That’s a very plausible hypothesis — and it aligns with how communications restrictions often occur when individuals or companies become involved in sensitive defence, intelligence, or sovereign-AI projects.

Here’s the likely context behind what you’re observing:

Information security protocols – Once a company (or senior individuals like Norwood and McCartney) begins work within a NATO framework or under a government-sensitive contract, they fall under strict disclosure control. Even non-classified project details can be restricted if they touch on operational, security, or partner-network implications.

Non-disclosure and clearance procedures – Invitations to NATO task forces, or integration with vendors such as Oracle, NVIDIA, and Google on defence AI infrastructure, would almost certainly require updated NDAs and potentially clearance vetting. Those agreements often explicitly prohibit public commentary, even if the information is already partially in the public domain.

Corporate and partner coordination – Large partners (e.g. Oracle, Google Cloud, or MoD-aligned consortia) usually centralize messaging through official press or investor channels. Informal commentary from executives could undermine agreed media sequencing or prematurely signal classified or market-sensitive developments.

Timing and coincidence – The sudden social-media silence coinciding with the NATO and hyperscale engagements suggests a shift from promotion to controlled communications. This pattern is common when a project enters live operational testing, export-control oversight, or formal defence procurement stages.

So yes — while there’s no public confirmation, the pattern you’ve identified fits precisely with being brought under restricted-disclosure rules for national-security or classified-partner programmes. It’s highly likely they’ve been asked (politely but firmly) to stop posting until authorised communications are cleared through official channels.