Member Info for Warrie

Potential2Rise

Top cross ramper 👍

https://******************************************pwnjdr-media-spotlight-on-albas-stake-in-motzfeldt-rare-metals-project-and-greenlands-strategic-potential

He said something similar on another board, bit of a storyteller.

Got some more now

No quotes on I.G.

Holal,

All I said was sell now please, If you feel anxiety it's for your benefit to relieve your feelings.

I have never had to ask anyone on any board advice on whether to hold or sell, it's called ownership of your own decisions.

Sell now please.

Tapman

There is a clue in the name Rare Earths

Arabanoo,

Your post has covered it all.

It won't actually make a difference to the trolls , this site is quite possibly one of the most unregulated sites on the World Wide Web, the admin need to take a good look at themselves and ask some serious questions about how they address these recurring issues. It is far too easy to sign up here for free and then post fud in order to disrupt.

No effort is made here to safeguard against the incessant trolling , name calling and general abusive behaviour that has become a regular feature to the point that many genuine investors have now become comatosed to acceptance.

I recently signed up to a group that have an interest in a rock band I have followed for 60 years, even though members of that band are no longer with us, I had to go through a process of answering questions about tge band and then I was asked to agree to the site rules before my application was accepted, it took 2 days to clear, the site is fantastic, full of people who I will never meet in real life but already make me feel welcome.

This site by contrast I personally couldn't care if it was taken down tomorrow, it would not be missed in my World. I find my self using it less and less, check in for news occasionally, the odd observation that may prick my interest and that's it for the day.

Appealing to a troll to find another site to disrupt , I think you have higher odds of winning the lottery.

But thanks for your analysis of said troll, he was easy enough to spot without the assistance of AI.

We all create a few typos, we also are victims of auto correct, but when you suddenly turn up from nowhere on this board and start questioning people aggressively , pointing out their poor "grammer", maybe cut a bit of slack, btw It's Grammar .

Well what a contrast from yesterday, nice pleasant board,yesterday's positive RNS seemed to bring the best out.

Today , S.P. goes down and so does the general demeanor of posters. What I noticed was how suddenly a couple of new accounts are thrown in for good measure to help create more chaos.

Well played patvyouselves on the back , here's the rubbish, nothing has changed other than the fact we are a day nearer to more positive news, you achieved nothing as far as I am concerned, my shares are still all accounted for , we go again Monday.

Dining in Spoons? I would probably pass.

But if you want to get rat ar$ed and want to avoid the embarrassment of falling over I can highly recommend a Spoons in Newquay, the moment you walk in the gaff your feet will stick to the carpet,. Enjoy

Muldoon

Are you saying you prefer Terriers to Girls, that's not right.

Ocelot

If trading is slow they walk it down a bit further to steal more cheap shares, corruption ,I know that, you know that, stop trying to sound clever.

“Upon commencement of role”

“Subject to regulatory and clearance matters”

➡️ Typically 1–2 weeks before name disclosure

📌 Parliamentary & MoD Timing

Disclosure is unlikely:

During Defence Committee activity peaks

During sensitive spending or capability debates

More likely:

Immediately after a parliamentary recess

In a quiet RNS, not a headline announcement

📌 Third-Party Confirmation

The CEO may first appear:

In a partner press release

In a NATO / supplier announcement

As a quoted executive without a full bio

This is common for defence-sensitive hires.

Market Reaction Playbook

CEO Profile Likely Market Response

Ex-Tier-1 Defence Prime 🟢 Immediate credibility, steady accumulation

Ex-MoD / Intelligence 🟢🟢 Strong long-term conviction

Cyber / Tech CEO 🟡 Volatile, then reassessment

Anything non-UK 🔴 Credibility damage

Bottom Line (Plain English)

You don’t assemble a former CDS, NATO NIAG leadership, and senior cyber/intel operators to appoint a generic CEO.

Everything about the process points to:

a UK-cleared defence operator who is still disentangling from something sensitive — and whose name will only appear once it is safe to do so.

defence holdings – incoming ceo: sovereign thesis addendum (draft)

context

defence holdings has assembled, within six months, a board dominated by senior uk defence, nato, cyber, and intelligence leadership. the company has confirmed the appointment of a new ceo commencing in q2, with the individual’s name withheld for security and nda-related reasons.

this combination is highly atypical for a conventional listed-company appointment and strongly implies a candidate profile aligned with uk sovereign defence capability rather than commercial optics.

core inference (high confidence)

the incoming ceo is highly likely to be a uk national, uk-resident, security-cleared individual with deep operational experience in uk defence, mod programmes, or tier-1 defence contracting.

this inference is supported by:

explicit reference to security considerations

delayed disclosure despite appointment being finalised

board composition anchored in uk sovereign defence credibility

strategic emphasis on sovereign ai / sovereign software

most likely ceo archetype (ranked)

1️⃣ former uk tier-1 defence prime leader (most probable)

profile

ex-ceo / md / sector head at bae systems, qinetiq, thales uk, bab****, leonardo uk

extensive mod contracting experience

used to classified programmes, not promotional leadership

why this fits

immediate credibility with mod and nato partners

clearance already held or transferable

silence aligns with gardening leave / programme transition

market implication:

🟢 strong validation of defence holdings as a serious defence platform

2️⃣ former senior mod or intelligence capability leader

profile

ex-dg, 2-star equivalent, or programme head

direct exposure to sovereign capability delivery

recently exited public service into industry

why this fits

explains nda sensitivity perfectly

aligns with lord houghton’s presence

suggests defence holdings may already be embedded in sensitive programmes

market implication:

🟢🟢 long-term strategic confidence, quieter but deeper conviction

3️⃣ uk cyber / national security tech ceo (exited post-transaction)

profile

founder or ceo of uk cyber, isr, ai, or data-fusion firm

company acquired or recapitalised in last 12–24 months

still uk-resident and clearance-eligible

why secondary

strong thematic fit

but board already supplies cyber/intel depth

ceo likely needs heavier mod scar tissue

market implication:

🟡 initial volatility, settles with execution proof

who the ceo is almost certainly not

❌ us or non-uk national

❌ dual-national executive

❌ private-equity turnaround specialist

❌ pure ai / saas founder

❌ high-profile “available” executive

any of the above would directly undermine the sovereign positioning.

what to watch: ceo name disclosure triggers

📌 rns wording shift

likely precursor language:

“following completion

Got really bored watching the Forest match tonight, the builder who coaches that team couldn't run our junior league side, embarrassing to watch, Dyche out!!

Anyway now I got that off my chest , I thought about the dream team we have added to today and for a bit of fun asked ChatGPT if it could use it's logic to work out who would fit the profile to become our new CEO. providing it with the names we already know and their backgrounds it responded with three candidates ,..an American Woman who was in the U.S, dept of defence for two years before resigning, some French dude in a similar role and a Finnish Tech Expert.

So, not impressed with those offerings I reworded my initial question by stating the current board members are British and reside in the U.K. and the company is aligning to our M.O.D ,everything they do has to have Sovereign Defence capability.

That produced a very different response, I may be barking up the wrong tree with this but as I said , just a bit of fun,.....and Forest were an embarrassment,...Dyche out!!

ChatGPT analysis to follow,.....

@Chellybaby

I have used I.G. for 3 years , no fee, no commission. You also get 3.75% on any surplus funds you have in your wallet

They were charging a monthly fee if you did not make 3 trades in that month but they have dropped that charge now. So really good app, I highly recommend, also no issues buying at times when others seem to find stock difficult to acquire.

@paul1828,

I thought the same from the first appointment of James Norwood to the Coalition of the Willing (CoW)

here's the list so far

James Norwood Non-Executive Chair → Deputy Chair Senior defence and industry leader; NATO NIAG Coalition of the Willing member

Field Marshal Lord Houghton of Richmond Non-Executive Chairman Former Chief of the UK Armed Forces; House of Lords defence committee member

Ian Yarwood-Lovett Independent Non-Exec Director Tech and strategic gaming/defence experience

Andy McCartney Chief Technology Officer AI & sovereign software tech leadership

Jim Clover OBE Advisory Board Member Senior UK cyber and intelligence operations leader

Profitjock wrote

"I would like to see actual proof of contracts or actual money being made by for ALRT"

We Investors have faith that will happen, a bit puzzled by why you would like to see it happen when you won't be benefitting.