Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
SL - whilst not wishing to specifically indulge in the scenario you flippantly paint out below, your over-riding point certainly raises a question which has been on my mind for a while. So far I'm reading multiple projections for recompense per TV sold of generally anywhere between £10 and £50. Apart from using Edison or the UpsideDownsideCapital articles as a base for this assumption, has anybody provided any genuine logic for this being the likely range? We're talking about TVs that sold for hundreds of pounds per set, for which the differential branding - the USP if you like - was that it was QLED or Q for quantum dots. £10 per TV set that sold for £1,000 in many cases seems an incredibly modest prediction. Perhaps I'm being fanciful/naive that the award could be higher than this, if perhaps not quite the scenario below.
And there you go again.
Why don't you try and post something NW which doesn't contain any aspersions on others, what they do, what don't do, what they're capable of, what they're not and why others' opinions are somehow less valid than yours. Just a post with your perfectly valid opinion on N and nothing else?
If an 'open-minded debate befitting of Nanoco and the seriousness nature of the stock market and legal proceedures' is what you genuinely seek, than that is the quickest way to achieve it.
NW - You could have stopped after the first 2 paragraphs and it would have been a perfectly reasonably response.
That you continue to then patronise and cast aspersions on the relevant experience of a group of strangers that you've presumably never met is unnecessary and reflective of your constant need to turn everything into a self-created competition with parameters you have defined to enable you to be the winner in your own mind - something I think you refer to as confirmation bias in one of your previous posts.
My own view is that you're either a chronic narcissist, inherently insecure and continually seek to belittle others and ensure you remain central to the topic of discussion for validation purposes, and/or are on the spectrum and thus unable to interpret different points of view to your own and have insufficient social skills to be able to respond any differently than to seek conflict and peddle a narrative of 'No, I'm right and you are wrong'. Whichever it is, it's childish and tedious. Whether you were previously banned from here and ADFN or not I don't know, but you most certainly left under a cloud after discussion followed the same patterns as it has since you rejoined here.
BtB
Thanks for your honesty. I felt sick in a way you might have on the day of the 6p, can remember refreshing my phone assuming the price must be some sort of error. But, equally, I'd always viewed Nano as a long-term investment and, after the initial exasperation, saw those prices as an opportunity to bring my average well down. Hopefully, somewhere down the line, this brings some real prosperity to both of us. All the best.
BtB
No issues with reading negative sentiment if it enhances and provides balance to a discussion, but, at present, I'm just reading substanceless drivel. If you can tell us why we'll reach 14p based on something other than gut feel or bitterness of past experience - great. If not, what's the purpose of the post? It adds no value.
I remember posts from you telling us to buckle in for the ride at £2 and above, and also posts about impending oblivion at 6p when you sounded like a broken man. Without a reasonable basis for these predictions, there comes a point when people just stop listening.
BtB
'We've seen it all before' - were you referring to Nanoco pivoting away or just you speculating on such, in a perpetual haze of negativity?
Hasiba
The same statement still reads 'The Fund is pleased with the appointment of the new CEO, Antony Maris, who brings relevant experience in developing and operating fractured basement reservoirs', so I highly doubt their words are monitored and updated as a course of routine.
Senseman
78 done
Mariog
Great stuff, assuming you can still smell 3.5p or 4p by the end of the week - a 33% rise on no news?
Mariog
Great stuff, assuming you can still smell 3.5p or 4p by the end of the week - a 33% rise on no news?
Tissuethenaway
Your silence is deafening
I think it's fair to say that, historically, in the absence of news this share has often drifted. I'm personally quite pleased as I think it represents a great opportunity to top up for those of us playing a longer game, primarily for many of the reasons outlined below.
Botbot
'Missed you all' - that's quite surprising really as I've only ever otherwise heard you talk about yourself! I trust your absence was nothing to do with HUR dropping through the floor, and your return is not a consequence of its recent recovery?
BTB
"That could frustrate those looking for a quick buck"
I have to say, your incessantly defeatist posts make it sound like there is one person in particular who is frustratedly pursuing a quick buck.
I believe it fully reads '£200m-£250m OR MORE' - would imagine they've erred on the side of caution/prudence with the quoted figures.
Quite a strange and subdued response to this morning's news, can only assume those heavily invested had already considered this outcome a given based on the earlier transcripts, or that they don't consider the risk to have changed. Just begs the question who is selling and why? Am here for the long haul but find this share so puzzling sometimes, we have been so much higher with such little justification - the climbs here always seem relatively steady compared to the falls. Hopefully it'll be worth it in the end. GLA.
I think we'll need to get into the £'s for BotBot to recover his losses from Hurricane Energy
Talisker, I guess we could say that you found the positive aspects of the information he relayed to be tenner-ble
That would be nice
Hard to think this doesn't reflect well on the transcript at the Markman hearing, somebody knows (or has a strong inclination of) something
'It is critical that we continue to preserve the financial position of the Company and maintain our cash runway to the second half of 2022 to allow us to maximise the value inherent in our IP (and the Samsung lawsuit) and our operational capabilities. Contingency plans remain available if needed to protect the value in our IP, though potentially at the cost of our operational capability.'
The last sentence suggests to me that a mere fund-raise isn't the only method of extending the cash runway that the company might consider. I think we can all hope that we tie up a contract elsewhere before it comes to that.