They hold 53m shares.
Also, the SFO investigation was concluded October 2021. That’s 21 months ago.
We’ve filled more gaps both ways than a big happy thing, only to fall down the big gap again.
Must have happened well over a dozen times this year alone.
Gaps? Pah!
“ Cos there will be no news.”
What makes you so certain, Victor?
Sept 8th @ 1:48pm
They rarely get their timing right.
I can only guess that this thread originated from our resident whiner, as he’s on ignore.
Somebody said recently that they hope he sells up just before a validation RNS comes out.
I’m beginning to think along the same lines but I don’t think it will happen because he appears to be like a rabbit in the headlights.
Frozen, clueless and incapable of blaming himself for being on this road in the first place.
Only one person presses the buy button.
Ditto.
Filtered.
I tried.
Best for you to seek help. You really are showing signs of needing it.
I’ve sold at an eye watering loss before. It takes a while but it liberates you in the end.
I’m being serious now, for your own sake seek advice.
“ Need answers from this incompetent board.”
You had the perfect opportunity to look them in the eye today as you raised your concerns. However, according to you, you had better things to do.
If I was as concerned as you are, I’d take the opportunity to speak to them to outline my concerns face-to-face. Either that or sell up.
You clearly think that this Company has no future, yet you continue to hold.
Madness.
For heavens sake man; all this constant whining over £500.
Clearly shares in biotech aren’t for you.
Perhaps a cash ISA or premium bonds would suit your risk profile more appropriately.
In the meantime, either sell up or quit the whining. Lots of us are bored with it now.
Have a nice day.
Okey dokey.
Thanks.
Why?
Thank you neil.
That’s put my mind at rest.
ATB.
VV
@neilin
I’d be interested to hear their response to your email.
Whatever happened to financed through to 2024?
“ No big investors are attracted to this share ,”
Martin Lang would suggest otherwise.
VV
Your original reasoning was that the IP wasn’t strong enough coupled with CIZs inability to stave off the competition.
Once challenged on these, you now conveniently change your actual motivation for shorting was the possible drawdown.
Reminds me of a song by Culture Club.