It’s a long way off until Feb when the results are around...the SP will still be at the mercy of the Shorters let’s hope they close
What garbage! Tell me why a sale would happen at 20p as you have suggested, when Investec recent projections on a conservative basis is more than 32p? Where I do have questions is about the low key MVR launch method regards to the artists and not announcing AAA artists ie Adele why hold back? Where is the app upgrade, and others not going multi platform, also where are the other markets Auz, NZ let alone other territories? I’ve held a personal view we are down at the SP by design and feel MVR will need to either partner with a heavyweight brand or sell out in order to truly extract the platforms value. If there is a suitor in the wings then they’ll want to see the final figures for sure IMHO Price- who knows , but it won’t be 20p based on the Investec report....MVR in the right hands is a golden egg and cash cow...let’s hope the BOD get the price it is worth not today but it’s approx value 2 years away
That post speaks for itself. Why go to such length to pick selected soundbites and in the same post openly confess to de ramping. All what you’ve written is easily answerable published in the public domain by well researched announcement and is on record. Your shorting attempts fool no one and cries of desperation
If your grammar was better, and were able to formulate a sentence correctly, you may be able to fool some folk. Such attempts to undermine is obvious to anyone with a modicum of common sense. Stop wasting your own time, doesn’t a CEO of two companies have more pressing matters to attend to, If indeed that is genuine?
There is huge interest and money invested in EVRH by much larger bodies and corporates like Sony, Universal, Warner, Microsoft etc Not to mention institutional investors who have placed at above the prices we are today. Personally I would prefer observing this and not listen to some unknown guy prattling on about porn sites and education to negatively slight. They will have their place. As for EVRH and music anyone that says it is not a factor delusional imho Definite agenda there in my opinion.
Having managed budgeted advertising schedules timed to support brands in my career, I’ve seen evidence consumers start to make purchase decisions as early as Oct for Xmas purchasing. So it may be 4 months till Xmas but platforms will be defined and in place to support demand in Sept/Oct imho
Amazon paid $3bn to acquire Beats. As a lot of money is being earns from streaming by Sony, Warner, Universal ( $1bn per month) If EVRH went for a £1, on the basis of the above alone, peeps would be pretty vexed
Bit of fun on a cold wet Saturday ! My guess is 2. equally prominent global media channel = ? Amazon Why? Perhaps because “Amazon has unleashed its latest step toward taking over, well, pretty much everything. The world's largest online retailer launched a nationwide campaign to promote its music streaming service last week. Amazon Music was able to double its number of hours streamed over six months, but the giant still falls behind Spotify and Apple Music when it comes to the number of subscribers and control in key markets. “Labels are now looking to Amazon, as well as YouTube and Pandora Media, to counter Apple and Spotify,” shares a recent Bloomberg report. "If new players can sign enough customers, the two leaders will lose leverage in rights negotiations."
Thought this level was a good re-entry point to pick up 150k, was a little unsure about the Old Mutual stuff, regardless there is so much pending news, I’m a holder the risk of missing out from here was a driving factor for me
Jeppers Creepers! That tells it all Old Mutual is shorting big time and increased from yesterday it’s % age short...not sure the selling is done yet imho
“super” is one of those throw away terms marketers and other use to try keep interest maintained. It means nothing unless substantiated with fact, so why use it? Just say “soon” or alternatively if it is imminent, then say so rather than use lose terminology. Amateurish use of wording in my opinion . Now prove me wrong MelodyVR and make it soon
https://www.ig.com/uk/shares-news/evr-holdings--turning-virtual-insanity-into-virtual-reality-180719
This is google analytics data which can be accessible
Personally I’m not expecting news today which is material affecting the share price. Until we have broader market reach with hardware to support the territories the SP will remain at this level in my opinion. If though they give insight on launch timings then this would naturally affect our direction of travel. I’ve stopped making predictions on this share instead believe that it will be an amazing ROI for me, and will tuck away in the drawer and return in a year. Pleased to be stunned with surprise though please ;-)
I see that the Software MelodyVR branding Is a colour inversion of the MelodyVR logo. So it maintains and is true to the original creative logo form. Keeping the same form but with a reverse colour suggests there is an association between both.
Would be good to know when the first live concert is planned.
Are you invested here? Yes You're correct both Old and New "Hope" for something good..that's all we have "Hope" currently with no detail or facts. This is the point of the note Caveat Emptor, lots of folk as the note of JSBach123 29 May'14 states have been caught up and for new and old alike it needs to be kept in mind. End of, each to their own
Of course its suspended, that's not the point of the message you numpty! "Non so blind as those that can't see" If the new CEO can turn it around without cost to shareholders, emphasis on IF and nothing is proven yet, then we'll all be happy...but let's not delude ourselves thinking this is a "Home Run"
Cautionary message from another BB JSBach123 29 May'14 - 15:52 - 10857 of 10857 4 0 I'm not surprised (as an ex-investor who sold at a loss when shares were pennies not tenths of pennies) that some investors wish to hold the old BOD to account and it seems an unjust world that they are living on shareholder funds as i write this (their past salries etc) - their 'spin' was spin of the most despicable kind, unethical IMHO if not actually illegal - but I am surprised by those who think that SG had a product worth something commercially and still do; I called it 'digital snake oil' some considerable time ago and the decade long failure to have it commercially adopted rather reinforces my view. But good luck to investors who hope that the company 'shell' can be applied to something more profitable going forward.
Ian B. The new entrants into VIY are unfamiliar with the extent to which over many years there has been misleading statements, false hopes etc... we know the old BOD has gone and that there is a " New Broom". The CEO has said he wants to deliver shareholder value, which is what the previous BOD promised. I for one will not be believing any hot air about deals, timing etc until there is something disclosed. The other area of concern is the manner in which the new VIY will raise funds to finance future initiatives and if this entails dilution. I'm afraid Ian you're also reliant on speculation only and guess work of the possible developments all of which is not substantiated to date.