RE: Ralph2010....for the 3rd time...8 Aug 2018 22:30
BP initially used Dundee as a marine supply base for Forties, because BP was a state owned company and the Labour Government of the day was influential. Dundee was highly unionised and the US contractors like Brown and Root and McDermott were anti-union, as were the US operators. Aberdeen had an airport which connected with London and a better sea passage to the north , and the unions had little influence there. There was little love lost between the two cities, and at planning committee meetings in Aberdeen Town House, you only had to say that the work would otherwise go to Dundee to get planning permission for anything!
It was indeed a 5 year flash in the plan for Dundee, and they learned nothing from the prolonged Timex strike which tarred Dundee for decades.
The legislators in Stanley have been to Aberdeen and Shetland to learn the lessons of history. Shetland scalped the oil industry through enhanced business rates for the Sullom Voe terminal to create an Oil Fund for community benefit. They will know that.
Royalty is a tax deductible expense and so it is not as severe as the headline number suggests. It will not sway any decisions about FID in my view. Deemed CGT and double taxation penalties for rotation workers are more problematical, as are higher PAYE rates for oil workers. It is these latter issues which need sorting