Member Info for vauch

Hat of to the management to raise at a sensible price, unlike our shower doing all raising at a 50% discount

I check in each day and see V has gone up, at the same time we are still in this s**t pattern of not keeping up, this should be at 35 to 40p now

Theas fires are the reason I have not fitted a battery to my home solar until we can get a V home unit battery in the UK

LG also had a recall in the US after several houses burnt down due to faulty batteries. all Li batteries

And Bill 1.6 mill

So ED has 2'200'000 now

30-Jan-20 30-Jan-20 Placing Edward Roland Dawson 0.12 GBX 50,000,000 55,272,919
30-Jan-20 30-Jan-20 Buy Bill Smith 0.12 GBX 33,333,332 42,472,677
07-Aug-18 06-Aug-18 Buy James Smith 0.36 GBX 3,000,000 10,000,000
05-Jul-18 04-Jul-18 Buy James Smith 0.42 GBX 3,000,000 7,000,000
04-Jul-18 03-Jul-18 Buy Edward Roland Dawson 0.39 GBX 1,308,900 5,272,919
30-Nov-17 30-Nov-17 Buy James Smith 0.53 GBX 4,000,000 4,000,000
13-Jun-16 26-May-16 Placing Richard Mays 1.00 GBX 1,500,000 2,811,474
13-Jun-16 26-May-16 Placing William H Smith 1.00 GBX 7,500,000 9,139,344

With Italy on line I can see this passing 20p but if a placing happens before the asset is on line then it will destroy any chance of that

What has happened to the coal power station that was going to be built?

Ah not ED's tiger off the leach

You would think that a company with so few share now would explode on good news.

Can we finally break the 2.5p consolidation price

Wow I really cant believe it confirmation finally that we now own half of a power station.
I was hoping the Italian asset would be on line first and pumping in the cash for the power station drilling program.

Rounded up my holding with my last purchase of 244298
Dot ask how much I have in this one as it is clearly to much

Tweet or two from the co, don't make me laugh. they have not tweeted in over 2 month.

Another reason Greenfield may take it on

CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
George Stapleton
Petroteq Energy
15315 West Magnolia Boulevard, Suite 120
Sherman Oaks, California 91403
Email with read receipt to gstapleton@petroteqenergy.com
Subject: Division Directive to Provide Update to the Tentatively Approved Notice of
Intention, Petroteq Energy, TMM Asphalt Ridge Mine, M/047/0089, Uintah
County, Utah
Dear Mr. Stapleton:
On July 23, 2019, the Division of Oil, Gas and Mining (Division) tentatively approved a
significant revision to the Notice of Intention to Commence Large Mining Operations (Notice)
for the TMM Asphalt Ridge Mine. The Division received no public comments during the 30-day
comment period. Petroteq was then required to post a reclamation surety of $3,527,000 in order
to receive final approval to expand mining operations. On November 11, 2019, the Division
received a letter from Petroteq proposing an “Incremental Reclamation Surety Schedule” where
bonding would, at least in part, be tied to mine production. The Division rejected this proposal
in a letter dated December 9, 2019, citing that the State of Utah did not have the authority to
approve the risk that would be taken on by bonding on an incremental basis.
In May 2020, the Division learned that Petroteq was required to vacate the property
because its lease was revoked, and at that time the permit fee had not been paid. The permit fee
has now been paid, and the Division understands the lease has been reinstated. The Division
continues to hold two surety bonds totaling $385,672.00 for 22 acres of disturbance but has not
issued final approval for the revision because it has not received the increased surety. For
operations to continue at this site, the Division needs to receive an updated Notice detailing
mining and processing facilities and operations.
Petroteq is hereby directed to provide the Division with an updated Notice by no
later than March 1, 2021. This Notice should address all requirements of the rules in R647-4.
This includes but is not limited to, company contact information, mineral processing methods
and facilities, waste handling and management, and the reclamation plan. Company contact
information, including names of the operator’s principals, must be consistent on the Notice, the
surety documents, and in records of the Utah Division of Corporations.

Yep Chad they want the shares now, but it looks like pressure in on our side

A 5mill trade went through on advfn at .5

If something massive is going on in the background, I would not be surprised if the asked for the share to be temporally suspended. I had this experience before with a share.