RE: lost for words3 Sep 2019 08:59
Nom Nom,
if and it is an IF (as I would not confirm anything to you), due to your stance on Val!.
A PI had had the common sense and taken the time, to research, clarify and record, such information, over a variety of social media sites, he or she, like us, would use it to help his or her, OWN complaint, to whomever they decide to complain to?
Although it could also help others who complained as well, once said complaints were correlated?
Finally, I would suggest this information, has not become known generally, as this person(s) could well be waiting to see if the following statements made.... (conveniently) most NOT by RNS, although one or two were....
WE ARE IN TALKS WITH MULTIPLE CO's / IT BLOODY WORKS REF 201 / and WE ARE IN TALKS WITH SIX CO's REF 401 / HAVE TWO LOI SO FAR / HENCE WHY NDA, KEEPS GETTING USED, when direct questions asked?
Now if this is proved to be incorrect, and the information gained is correct, then surely all this information gathered, would be the final nail in coffin?
All hearsay, until it happens I suppose.... amazing really, that ANY "professional" would be so blase or indeed stupid, or is it arrogant! To do such a thing?
Only time will tell and I have a feeling, the next couple rns's will answer most questions and define, whether this info, comes to light?
Have to say it is getting tedious at present, forever WAITING and IF a CO had such interest, surely something would have leaked by now?
DYOR and all IMO ?