Member Info for ValJu

O/T

Morning Nom Nom,

fyi I made more on that Hulk, that I bought the other day, in LESS than one day, than I have here, in a very long time?

Not sure a Timex would make the same return!

:)

So, are you of the Grizzly type or the Furby type lol Grrrrrr lol

201 has no LOI as yet, that I am aware of

401 has LOI, that have been rns'd ?

LOL

the minority is you whippet matey

the majority, are at a loss and would love for sp to recover, ON VAL COMPOUND MERITS

whilst at the same time NOT sucking in more new cash, to add, to the many walking wounded and again filling BoD pockets... for next few weeks./months

all imo

and not forgetting rns about 301 patent approved and was awaiting payment ?

why not add in, to rns, it has been paid for ? and save money ? or has it ???

no deal news, no money, but another patent!

Zzzzzzz

Including the BoD Fred, including the BoD ?

now who does that remind you of, posting wise on here... ?

Unless of course, you were at the agm and heard with your own ears, what Gerry (the CFO) stated?
Flippantly or not, it was stated and if he doesnt know, who would ?

lol, Actually my next watch was Sat just gone, Hulk Sub :)

Just a genuine thought, "what if" the current funding wont stretch until Jan 20?

Opinions....

get a grip mm's

I preferred the heady heights of 79p :(

.01255 to sell so looks all buys to me?

is news around the corner... I hope so!

leopard :)

although, sick man of asia (Bruce Lee) springs to mind

I believe IMO that sp is being depressed, so a large chunk can be bought as low as poss, from those giving up... my opinion, my gamble, but could be my benefit, hopefully?

That person being George then, as there is no other person "in charge" imo
As currently Val still own a 55% controlling interest?

So, why let it go, yes you hit nail on head, as you state they cant afford next level, yet, to buy said controlling interest, was less than a single directors annual remuneration?

I would also say, if you went back over the finances and raises etc and looked closely, then added, the who took what and when, we would have money still available, instead of dire straights... You dont take high is sals with no income, you wait until you generate that income?

Im sure if you compared salaries and costs etc, you will see where the bulk of the cash goes?

Thinking we shall have to agree to disagree as, I have an inclining whats coming next... maybe you do to... and from the grape vine, 401 is far from over, imo, and does have Co's that want it, but as always "other points" clog up, the negotiations... :(

Hi Y1970,

maybe ask yourself, why do you think Val stooped funding 401 and cut it loose and stated it was now on its own, due to the six interested parties and two letter of intents? or indeed maybe ask Suzy or George?

in addition, who released the rns info on the six possibles? George or Suzy?

and again ask yourself, who sanctions all the info for release, ie: who is the Chief Operating Officer?

imo it is not Suzy who the anger should be directed at, it is the COO and CEO and to a degree the CFO, the three key decision making people of the Co?

there is so much more to this than meets the eye, and quite frankly the only ones, who best interests are not being looked after, are us the shareholders imo

for the record, when we tried to vote a BoD off, it failed by around 35 mil to 71 mil? if i remember correctly, therefor, if many did register and did attend and did vote, yes they could close it down, but like JG, it could have an adverse effect on everyone? not easy is it....

but if at least all attended, perhaps we could see who really wants Val to succeed long term and who just wants to trade it?

just my thoughts

No Drac, valid point, BUT....

I disagree, as if you are there, you can see and hear for yourself, (no Chinese whispers) what is said and vote accordingly, or indeed, as I would expect (with the herd).

Imo, voting from afar, is an easy way to cop out!

Plus, at last agm yes we were out voted, but, had I started the "pledge thing" sooner and had all the letters in place, rather than simple email promises, it could have been a very different outcome?

It really does need a lot more preparation than many think and with so many, wanting a simple spike to exit, imo many were unsure as to which way to go, for fear of loosing out completely.

Attend and see and hear and network, as quite frankly, there is a very true saying... safety in numbers... why not ALL try it once?

An ideal time would be the next Egm, if as we expect, a consolidation does raise its head and then another share raise, is in the offing, what would you vote for.... abuse it or loose it ?

Mind you, the grape vine is alive with gossip at the moment, as I am sure some of you are aware?

And before you ask, no I would not repeat, but, I can say, I re-bought and imo it is not all bad, although, knowing the scenario's, I am sure, some may try to turn it that way... :(

Sorry for talking in riddles! but, I am hoping for a positive, although big risk, could be big reward

all the best VJ

Morning RB, well when I say grindstone, I actually mean sit back, with a nice cuppa, browsing the latest Rolex catalogue lol.... and replying to the occasional email and generally chill-laxing
with lse on in the background... :)

Not as some think, searching down back of sofa for 50p to put in lekky meter!