RE: Candid meeting...23 Nov 2016 11:17
G’morning & trust I’ve not kept everyone in suspense (no pun intended) for too long. As briefly mentioned late last night, we met for an hour and covered a lot of ground in a one on one rather candid discussion after brief introductions. I previously visited Lace a year ago but PL was absent at that time so it was our 1st direct encounter apart from past email communication.
‘EvenKeel’, I figured an open minded approach would serve best but was also more than ready to bat after more than 3 years of patience so asked PL to briefly explain the current situation and that I would interject when I required additional clarification.
He stated that as we are in suspension and a formal administration process is underway, every subject was pretty much open to discussion & that there was only one aspect which he did not want relayed or in print. After listening intently & exchanging thoughts on the matter, I’m in agreement and will respect that request. I mention this only to demonstrate that his entire demeanor portrayed an open book and one of total acceptance & responsibility. I stated; the “tech report” clearly outlined that the high risk point would be reached when blasting of the initial slot & trough intersecting with old upper workings and felt the BoD’s had put shareholders at unnecessary risk with tight funding? He conceded that marginal funding was not an oversight & in hindsight, sailing too close to the wind was a strategic BoD’s error in an attempt to keep equity dilution at a minimum admitting that the CFO projection was always spot on (not at fault) when cash would run out but EIIB insisted on her and EW’s departure. Should the restructure be successful which PL seems very positive it will, the error is one PL & the BoD’s will not repeat.
Importantly, we discussed “administration” (business rescue) under S.A. law versus “liquidation” and a clear distinction should be made. It is a powerful business tool allowing for creditor protection. J_b1000’s feedback provides good insight in this regard & I suggest folks read it again in conjunction with Alligan & BobZim posts! Out of pure circumstantial luck, DiamondCorp is the largest creditor (Soapstone & UK CB’s) having had to (fortuitously) structure this way as a result of 2008/9 financial market crash & tight liquidity. An “act of God” freak storm (as 1 of our posters stated) opened this avenue of protection perhaps suggested by DCP’s astute legal advisor? Liquidation was quite possible leading up to the downpour which ironically presented relief to seek protection and a restructure. The opportunity to file for protection was embraced & could not have taken place if the storm hadn’t occurred. The resource is intact not defunct and the flood caused a 12 week delay not a total collapse which is important criteria f