Member Info for valencia

Mellow Birds for me. After a coffee, obviously...

Indeed weathergeek...

Great info as ever by the way.

10 years too late, pmsl

Thank you!

Thanks ap - I will dig deeper and see if there's anything in the LSE rules as seeing 100m+ shares popping up like that most days feels like people staying juuuuust on the right side of the rules

By the way I mentioned the other night that I would look into any Dun and Bradstreet info on 1AF2. As soon as I registered I was hounded on both email and by phone from folk trying to sell me their service so I've not pursued.

I'm sure all will be revealed in time.

I posted this yesterday. Someone have any knowledge as to how this works?

"Anyone know when volume for late trades is formally recorded?

Reason I ask...

Today's total volume ended the day just above 236m traded. Level 2 shows it as such.

But when late trades are recorded on L2 in the hour after close (to account for the auction, late declarations from the previous day(s) and those delayed by an hour in the run up to 16.30) L2 doesn't appear to amend that total number

Thus far tonight an additional c.100m+ in trades are appearing yet the total volume traded hasn't flinched.

Does this get recorded anywhere eventually or does it fall into a hole?

Anyone know?"

Anyone help?

Or is tonight the ying to the other night's yang?

Anyone know when volume for late trades is formally recorded?

Reason I ask...

Today's total volume ended the day just above 236m traded. Level 2 shows it as such.

But when late trades are recorded on L2 in the hour after close (to account for the auction, late declarations from the previous day(s) and those delayed by an hour in the run up to 16.30) L2 doesn't appear to amend that total number

Thus far tonight an additional c.100m+ in trades are appearing yet the total volume traded hasn't flinched.

Does this get recorded anywhere eventually or does it fall into a hole?

Anyone know?

I understand the need to defend your original post but your reply makes little sense I'm afraid.

I'm as much a shareholder as any "mover and shaker" so he is legally bound to inform us of material changes.

It's not that difficult a concept - designed to prevent the authorities getting involved with the added benefit of preventing the likes of Pizza Boy fabricating lies and ought to stop people from making up stuff on messageboards and sticking to facts rather than conjecture.

Most people, lol.

And that's not a risk I would be willing to take, would you?

Getting quoted 0.507 to buy and .508 to sell

ARahim - not sure what you mean by a "tradable" RNS but AZ more than most will know that you cannot hold back any information that will have any material effect on the share price whether positive or negative

The fact you've invested might be the primary reason for this hunch, lol?

Sorry Ask!

definitely .54. bid at the moment MRRR

for a day of curious "investors" looking for an opportunity today with a negative slant on a concept they have no awareness of

Get filering or step away for the day

This is about the long game

Have a good day.

I'll set up a trial account, see what's what and report back if anything of interest - meant to do that yesterday

No website as such Ira but there is a Dun & Bradstreet resource behind a paywall

https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.1af2_srl.98863bf94b487c79f98121d6f4efb93e.html

Good Lord da - don't give me indegestion with that thought

Weather - I prefer savoury normally :)

Going to need a mahoosive paella pan...

Lovely stuff apunter - thanks again