Member Info for Usernamedbut1

Good find inphobe. That first sentence in the link is what I’ve been saying let alone above, today.

“Genomics is the future of healthcare”

In a nutshell. GDR is just one a handful that are in the genomics arena. So we are ahead of the game and could easily be a household name in the medical world.

I think what had happened...why we had dropped right back down under 40 is due to a larger investor/corp reducing their holding for whatever reason. Now that “feels” like it’s stopped we’re on our way back up...again.

Hitting 42 already. As mentioned this should be a fairly easy trip back north of 45. Hold tight, top up etc and you’ll have your rewards. Much bigger rewards due short to mid term (weeks) I feel.

No more sub 40... thank goodness. Painfully cheap this.
For those still on the sidelines.... clearing 40, should now mean we’ll get back to mid 40’s relatively quickly. Don’t miss out.
Solid positive news drawing closer.
Much to be positive about here. Much better place than when we were in the 70’s... keep going SRB!

Frustrating as ever eh hash.
This is why I often try dummy trades to get the live, more precise quotes to see where the sp might be moving.

Good as any price to buy right now... good call despite what some of the naysayers and the “I want to be negative” muppets will say.
Very hard to call the very top or bottom, so anything sub 20 IMO is well worth buying in at.

Although you make some reasonable points, Guy ... there’s a “but” on 2 points

1.....I’m not denying where we are and in part of why, but......it’s not that many of “like to pretend we are satisfied with everything, etc etc of your comment.” of course we’re not.
But....It’s that we have accepted and realise what’s happened...the past.... and now to move on of what we have to offer now and in the future.......And that (this old chestnut) constant negativity doesn’t help anyone or the sp, therefore not helping yourselves.
The future sooner or later is coming and it will be (and this is the key bit) much better than the past.

2.... the other but is about your Tesco response....
Has nothing to do with what I was saying.
Your response was as if I asked..... black or white? And your answer was “round”..... not even “grey”

My point was simple..... saving money, being frugal. Whilst at the same time, spending money on the important factors such as children’s future and how it will impact on them.
If these children (new borns) need the necessary attention and that golden hour can make an insurmountable difference then it’s a total no brainer. If, as a bonus, a supportive argument in evaluating if worthwhile or not is “cost saving,” then they work hand in hand.

Let’s not forget too, as mentioned several times now either by myself or others, that the NHS have staked their name on this. Pretty much claiming it’s their (pardon the pun) baby. So I feel very strongly that this is coming... the way forward across the NHS, as well as USA and Europe and potentially global.
Then we’ll see big bucks, annually.
For me and I think for some others it’s not just about AIHL but about the base line science of genomics.
AIHL is targeted specifically to the loss of hearing angle but the core technology can span right across the medical spectrum in detection. This is the main reason I think that is why we could very easily be a buyout/takeover target for larger pharmas.

UNB1

Forgot to mention..... it’s what Grim has also highlighted/supported what’s been mentioned and it’s not just about the money when it comes to the health and welfare of us mere humans.

Although some aspects of what the NHS now provides for some over the past years could be questionable as to whether the NHS should pay fund it or not, it still doesn’t just come down to money.

These new borns are our future and worth their weight in gold.
It shouldn’t even matter if this amazing product costs more ....
It’s the fact it’s literally miles better, more effective and an enormous game changer in the future of medicine.
It happens to be though, an added bonus it’s going to save money.

On the flip side though, if money can b saved and utilised elsewhere, that’s gotta be a good thing...right?

Certainly after reading the WHO article I posted earlier.

Let’s just hope that there are motions in the background that are occurring right now because personally it would be crazy if they weren’t.

Let’s hear more of hope and optimism rather than fear and pessimism although some of you, sadly (we all know who you are,) seem to relish at spreading doom and gloom instead........despite claiming to be shareholders in GDR

Ok guy..... have a go at this one then....

The groceries..... would you buy a 4 pack cans of baked beans for £3 or 4 individual ones for 80p each?

It’s only 20p difference but I know which I would go for

Because....all the time you work with frugality it’s gonna add up

Ps...
Smart ar5e comments about not liking baked beans or wouldn’t buy 4 anyway doesn’t apply here.

I’m sure you see what I’m getting at.

Perfect example Guy, of why you appear to “want” to be negative all the time.

£5 million is a hefty chunk in anyone’s pocket for goodness sake. Aside that, I believe that cost is only looking at short term costs to the NHS. Therefore likely to save NHS far more than suggested.

*** Found the following article/publication issued through WHO (World Health Organisation) and it’s findings are quite staggering.

I was literally shocked at how much it costs us all (globally) to cater for deaf/hearing difficulties people.
If link works... scroll through to around page vi, vii and viii regions. Also note this was compiled in 2017 so one could say costs would have increased.

- https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254659/9789241512046-eng.pdf -

“Global costs of unaddressed hearing loss and cost-effectiveness of interventions”

Hers a couple of extracts.....

? The cost to the health-care sector is estimated to be in the range $67–107 billion. This includes health-care costs for children and adults, which have been estimated separately; it does not include the cost of providing hearing devices such as hearing aids and cochlear implants.
? A conservative estimate of the cost to the education sector of providing support to children (5–14 years) with unaddressed hearing loss is $3.9 billion. This assumes that only children with at least moderately severe hearing loss (hearing level greater than 50 dB in the better-hearing ear) require educational support.

? Loss of productivity, due to unemployment and premature retirement among people with hearing loss, is conservatively estimated to cost $105 billion annually.
? Societal costs – the result of social isolation, communication difficulties and stigma – add a further $573 billion each year. These costs are calculated on the basis of the monetary value attached to avoidance of a year lived with disability and draw upon disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) attributed to hearing loss.
Overall, this cautious analysis suggests that the annual cost of unaddressed hearing loss is in the range $750–790 billion globally. The analysis takes no account of certain aspects of hearing loss, the costs of which are not well documented in literature, such as the costs of providing informal care, or preschool learning and higher education for people with unaddressed hearing loss.
Crucially, the analysis was hampered the absence of country-specific data, especially from low- and middle-income countries; nevertheless, it provides a realistic but conservative illustration of the costs associated with unaddressed hearing loss.

This too re prevention....

? Prevention
? Evidence suggests that prevention of hearing loss through early identification
and management of otitis media is highly cost-effective.

Sub 1p buy will go soon.
News very soon as we already know but will be a boost reassuringly once money is with us.
Suggest not to wait till then otherwise you may well be buying 1p+

As ever imo and gl to all

Sub 40’s gone soon.
Plenty of buys again and few sells.
Impending positive news on the horizon

Your post, Face, at 13.31..... nicely put.

The cake is ready to go, to be purchased by whoever. Cake being the AIHL kit.

NICE will officially recognise ( confidently assuming ) it as the best cake to order....for its ingredients, taste, looks and value for money.

In my opinion, we already know it’s the best practice option.

It’s far more efficient
Much more reliable
Cheaper overall and by a clear margin
Will pretty much eradicate those susceptible to hearing loss IF the current practices are still used.

Will save the NHS and any other large establishment hundreds of thousands in monetary terms over the lifetimes of the newborns given the AIHL test, because aside anything else happening to them, they won’t lose their hearing due to current practices.

TOTAL NO BRAINER for AIHL to become THE choice of practice.

Personally I’d be really peeeeeeee’d off if I found my local hospital/maternity ward won’t use it until NICE have fully submitted their findings.
And then....
If that was my child..... became aware of this test kit and then found out that my child COULD have had this kit used..... but hadn’t, well........ no words for it really

There are also numerous stages until NICE publish end results.
Hoping we may hear en route of progression. If so, I think at memory a stage of this is not far away now.
Otherwise, we have an update due soon as previously mentioned.
Putting all that aside....

Still an open target for some hefty action (pump dump style) ... this will inevitably help to some degree
Still an open target (with what the future holds for GDR) to be easy pickings for a buyout/takeover etc

Must be just days away now before the next chunk of money lands.

Tick tock tick tock
Make sure you’re in this stock

New Chair appointed. Michael Bell-Lynch.... also on the board with Gem Diamonds if anyone’s familiar with the company.
Should be a good appt and will help secure stability and future direction.
Still, it seems, we are under the radar.... giving ripe opportunities to those that find us as we’re still so flippin cheap.

Better week overall. Let’s hope this bodes well for next week etc.

Still way cheap here.

With so much in good stead for SRB let’s also hope we will, very soon, be saying bye to the 30’s and hello 40’s.
Gold looking steady for a recovery too.

decent £49k buy today....
Pleasing to see

Also, odd large buy/cancelled today.

@jay..... as you’re the research guru here.... could you find out who the woman is in the picture that’s at the bottom of the link.
Many thanks
;)

@nissan... sledge doesn’t own any shares here.
Just trolling a sad sad vengeful path of nothing.
Quite possibly the saddest person on here.
Not worth the bite

Agree with both of you. Not long now.
Personally with regards to the permit being granted I would suggest that we shouldn’t be waiting long at all for it.
I’d even stab at within a couple weeks.
The following I’ve taken from latest RNS....
........ “We have been anticipating being granted the right to mine Walviskop since January of this year ”......
How I read that is they were expecting to be granted back then.... to then have this appeal set against them at the last moment.

After re-reading the RNS and what Walviskop mine alongside the overall WHM operations have to offer are really quite something.
Game changer..... cheesy phrase but rightly stated here.

If all goes well and very soon, we may well see ourselves catapulting back up to say hi to 2p again

Another solid day. Virtually all buys bar a small handful.
At this rate we may well see 40’s again by end of week.
PoG recovering well attempting to break 1800 again at last.