Member Info for upomega

Should read script. Damne auto text through samsung phone that is still incapable of reading basic English.

Mr Tan
As a educated man i would hope that you would understand the sript of of Rudyard Kipling.s IF

Intelashis.
I am not a scott. But a very lth and just like bigjock have had communications with the company in the past. Hasten to add way before the covid situation. What i can add inmv is that the current ceo and his bod have not detracted in adding shareholder value. Also inmv their integrity is as sound as ever inmho

Rudyard kipling. If

Hopefully Rudyard Kiplings IF will not be removed. Even though some posters seem to be obsessed by heads

Or maybe. Its a rar far better place to go

Mr Tan . By adopting that approach the size of an individuals holding should be taken into context Its a bit like comparing the old FT30 and FTSE 100. Weighted and unweighted in calculation.

I am beginning to wonder if that some of the postings on here are breaking the law in some way. If they are posted by people who currently do not hold shares in the company .

I think Rudyard Kipling's poem IF is very apt for good many of us. It s well worth a read. Easily found on google.

Goldtrig like yourself i want to know when tt will be finished together with which test we will eventually produce for hmg. .I still have faith that matters will resolved soon. There is is a good link which i posted a while ago concerning the complexity of tt. I will try to post it later as its worth a read inmo

From my perspective i am not sure why some posters are getting worked up ad to which test eill be used. Whatever happens we will be manufacturing a test of sorts. If its not Moligic then im pretty sure the ceo will form a long term collaboration with the owner of the ip. Inmo.

Skedgey121. I was thinking more on the lines. Should the government go with another test other than moligic

I think what will be interesting is the type of long term contract that Omega signs . Depending which test the government goes with. What i would like to see is a contract with the owner of the ip to cover global sales outside of the government. In other words a long term collaboration agreement.

I think some posters on here need to go back a few years to see what Colin King and his team have achieved. I would say a great deal from the strategic review. In terms of goals set for for food tech and cd4. Let alone what they are now doing in regards to covid. All achieved on a shoestring in the grand scheme of things.
Not only that but alse the share price has done quite well during the past year .

Sounds like egos got in the way. Which inmo seems to be the problem with o and g industry.

As i posted earlier. I cannot understand the obsession with TT on Molicic. As Omega will manufacture for any test which becomes valudated. Worst case scenario is that we still manufacture and sell overseas for the Moligic test should the gvmnt decide not to purchase it.

The obsession with tt re moligic is clouding what will transpire. At the end of the day Omega will manufacture for someone. There is also still the opportunity of separately supplying tests to the aviation industry.

Barrywhit has recently posted a reply from the company re rumours of a placing and tt update. Worth a read inmv

Do we know the reason as to why no deal in some format could not have been brokered between rockrose and ourselves.

Correction some lth may not be very happy excluding pliljayjones if Serica dilutes the share base. Only my view from a thickie investor.