Adrian Hargrave, CEO of SEEEN, explains how the new funds will accelerate customer growth Watch the video here.
Trisor cut and paste from the website has been going on all week and IMO most of what is written on these website is utter BS and posing the atomic nano prices shows commercial ineptitude of NNN has spread to the shareholder ramper in chief.
No one is going to pay £20 for 40mls on atomic nano where competitor products are 50 to 100 times cheaper. It hard to believe NNN have done any market research let alone the significant market research they claim supports their business case.
Big ramping day to day.
Honestly if anyone wanted to buy the share price would be going up. Lots of words posted on websites but no results from NNN equals low quality ramping from desperate LTHs.
So sad...
There is not much in it but there are more sellers than buyers overall hence at beginning of March SP was 0.25 now end of month 25% down at 0.19 at this rate end of the April will be 0.14.
Two half bake websites and no news does not bode well.
Sorry small correction
I think this will be my last post for a while in which I'd like to refer anyone interested back to 1st of June RNS
"The verticals and areas in which the Company will be focussing are based on significant market research and feedback from potential customers."
On what "significant market research" and "feed back from potential customers" could NNN have possibly relied on to end up with a proposed hydroponics nutrient product being 50 to 100 times more expensive than the current products freely available online?
Was this a BS statement in the 1st June RNS, a marketing research failing or some other unidentified failing?
I know which I believe but please don't rely on my research please do your own and Id be happy to see it
I think this will be my last post for a while in which I'd like to refer anyone interested back to 1st of June RNS
"The verticals and areas in which the Company will be focussing are based on significant market research and feedback from potential customers."
On what "significant market research" and "feed back from potential customers" could NNN have possibly relied on to end up with a proposed hydroponics nutrient product being 50 to 100 times more than the current products freely available online?
Was this a BS statement in the 1st June RNS, a marketing research failing or some other unidentified failing?
I know which I believe but please don't rely on my research please do your own and Id be happy to see it.
Trisor more to the point why don't you assess your investments potential?
Google "hydroponics nutrients", I found many listings all claiming to work and the norm pricing is around £5 to £10 per litre or even one at £8 for 5 litres so who will pay £19.95 for 40mls of Atomic Nano?
There is nothing on Atomicnano.co.uk to says why it works or works better than other products just big claims. No one will pay £20 for 40mls when the can buy or are already buying 25 times bigger bottles for half or even a quarter the price. IMO the price point on the website is not just unrealistic it is utter madness.
This is my research, dont rely on it or NNNs websites please DYOR and tell us all what you find.
Atomic Nano still only mocked up bottles and no payment method. These tasks are not difficult and take next to no time to achieve and I mean days not weeks let alone the months this shambles have been at it.
Should they ever get these simple tasks completed it remains unclear how they hope to sell anything online. This is really challenging and they need experts on board which they clearly do not have judging by the state of the website dev.
RR thanks for kind words but I will stop if Micho does.
Down to you Micho.
Hey Micho I will stop if you stop.
Trisor I thought you believed its just a paper loss until you sell.
Like all stuff spouted by Micho 8K is nothing like the number in question.
Missed some spike hit others so what, Micho always claims success post event.
As always Trisor you don't address the point. Your posts are encouraging others even if you don't explicitly say it is advice, it is advice.
FYI I have been invested several times in NNN over the last two years and initially for quite serious money. Thank god I took my losses when did and just traded this on the trend or spikes, now Im up a little overall so quite content. If Id stayed in Id be 90% down now if Id averaged down Id just be in a bigger hole.
Without a counter points from the likes of me ExMS RR herbie etc this board would seem like NNN is a dream investment when in reality its been a nightmare for for everyone who bought in at 2p, 1p or half a penny. Seen all the RNS come to zilch and their investment fall away to didley squat and have to put up with just promise after promise.
As always Trisor you don't address the point. Your posts are encouraging others to post even if don't explicitly say it is advice.
Micho is just worst ramper character on the whole LSE and is actually the main reason I continue to put out a counter argument
Happy to help poor website execution to at least be considered for what it is. left to you it would still be whoop whoop great news we are on a roll but I know you don’t believe you just post to get out of your NNN black hole. Good luck with that.
Trisor 90% of your comments are encouraging people this is a good long term investment. Not explicitly saying buy does not remove you from doing just that.
Stop behaving like Spike.
Pleased no one bought any shares based on those two half baked websites being put in the public domain and shamelessly ramped by people with no moral compass.
IMO both are utter dross and will never generate any worthwhile sales.
Micho I’m happy to help.
Trisor you are allowed to give an opinion, that’s why they have the drop down.
Buy and ouch is back, funny thing is Stephen247 people have been saying that since 2p and so far it’s been terrible advice.
For me it’s more likely NNN will run out of money before they generate any worthwhile revenue hence the opinion, strong sell.
MORWENATRELAWNE what did you buy?