Member Info for Uggy100

Oh I´m still frowning deemule lol !
I´m still seething about the price we paid for the C holders stake.
Fact is the sale of Victory on its own more than supports the current sp. In addition we have the gas at WN pretty much nailed on & at the current price there´s no value ascribed to it as such. I find it difficult to believe that we won´t be able to prove up any liquids at WN (at the original WNA2 test liquids travelled circa 700 meters up the well bore unaided).
Seems to me the sp is undervalued substantially at this level but its AIM & a rocky ride is always a possibility.

Well the fact that Rathlin has now formally submitted the planning application as per yesterdays announcement surely indicates they´re happy enough with the test results so far ? If there were grave issues then would they not have held off on the submission ? Hopefully an update will be with us shortly & its good news.

I´m assuming he meant .61, wish that was my average. Holding strong but have massive issues with our management who I think are ****bags.

Must admit I find Pboo a rather detestable character.

The law of supply & demand will dictate pricing policy for our product. If global demand was such that we are fully utilised then feck the DHSC. They are just as likely to renege on any future contract, its the way they operate.

True. When it comes to BMD I´m certainly not a fan ! Whilst he clearly get some good info it appears to me that its mainly on the financial side of things which, to my mind, means he has chums in the broking houses. I would say it is highly unlikely his network extends to the operational side of things. Still all to play for despite having a few concerns of my own.

anal, I believe that DB at UJO said we have the gas, which I suspect you already know is far easier to extract. However, each to their own I suppose.

Ok persitawt. The Victory project should , at least cover the current sp. Not happy about the price we paid but it is what it is. In addition we have proved up gas from the A2 well. Under the current metric the so is undervalued but as usual it doesn´t suit your agenda.
It would be fair to say that I am disgusted by our jokers who run this company but even they cannot fook up what we appear to have. At current levels the sp appears to be undervalued substantially.
Actually your last post underlines what a complete piece of sh!y you really are, as usual.

The only question I have is that despite the progress, made at a snails pace, there seems to be no momentum here. Forget about RM (who has proved to be disastrous on many levels) We have a new CEO who seems incapable of driving the project forward. Many of us will be pushing up daisies before even Dundas comes to fruition. To the BoD I would say, provide your long suffering shareholders with a value accretive deal. If not step down & let somebody more competent take over the reins.

That was before the so called "information" was put out in the public domain. True or not RBD have a duty of care to its shareholders & should treat us accordingly.

Completely agree Rubey, its high time some sort of update is provided. I don´t think there has been a leak but you never know. The time for silence is over, the sp is being manipulated & it would be a sad indictment of t BoD not to provide an operational update.

NVG they´re all as bad as each other, neither side is trustworthy.

Twatter ???. Where is there any mention of multiple testing of various zones in an RNS ?

Ok rubey, expected you to give your input. Can you direct me to the info that we would be testing multiple zones which I must have missed.

True Barking but the MM´s are aware there are issues & will tree shake from time to time. An update is what is required which neither Rathlin will not be required to do unless there is pressure exerted on them by RBD (who will be reluctant to do so as they´re just hapless). In the meantime there just becomes larger overhangs on the sp, caused mainly by our 2 tools I would suggest. I still hope WN is a success but the longer the wait the more drag. Not what I signed up for years ago but have become used to being disappointed by the idiots that run this Co. they are so clearly ambivalent to their shareholders it becomes evermore an issue.

Barking, the sp is being played like a fiddle by the MM´s as a result of no updates from the operator who, as a private co. don´t care. Notwithstanding that RBD are the beneficial owners as such. It would be nice if we could force an update out of them but as our dynamic duo remain intransigent about things it would appear unlikely.

Unfortunately this co. doesn´t seem to have any PR, they just seem to crawl along at a snails pace.

Sent mine to reabold@camarco etc.

E mails I have sent them have NEVER been answered. I have every intention of attending the AGM in order that I may try to convey my deep disgust in their conduct. With regard to a bb having a direct effect on the sp I seriously doubt that. Their stewardship is the driver, or lack of, that affects the trajectory of the co.

Well Rubey, I´m not stupid as it happens but everyone has the right to **** off the dynamic duo due to non performance. THEY have made this co. virtually uninvestable as a result of their behaviour not shareholders.