Member Info for twix386

Start-ups Trigger Major Disruptions in NIPT Space with Novel Testing Formats backed by Hefty Funding

The competition spectrum of non-invasive prenatal testing is highly fragmented with scope for novel aspirants intending major disruptions in noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) space. In a recent development, a San Diego based new market player, Cradle Genomics has affirmed its success in amassing a whopping $17.1 million to aid optimal research dedicated towards NIPT. The company is likely to successfully launch its novel NIPT tests as a significant step, furthering scope in non-invasive prenatal testing market. Such ongoing advances are likely to direct sustainable returns in global non-invasive prenatal testing market in forthcoming years.

Further in non-invasive prenatal testing space, leading companies are gaining strong grounds on the back of diverse business associations and strategies. In this regard, Thermo Fisher Scientific is all set to use it's liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry testing platform in tandem with NeXosome of NX Prenatal. The companies are poised to develop highly effective non-invasive prenatal testing measures to ensure safe and healthy fetal development.

Emerging countries such as India is at the infancy of NIPT adoption. In a recent development, Thyrocare technologies that has made biochemistry tests and diagnostics mainstream in the country is likely to further disrupt noninvasive prenatal testing space in the country. The company is vocal about limiting the massive prices of NIPT in India, bringing it down to around eight thousand rupees. The development is believed to enlarge the scope of NIPT in the country with several physicians and expecting parents undertaking the same.

No downside........ Just the daily retrace instead of appreciating in run up to Results. Day 3.
Disappointing. It must all be priced in at 13p with little buying interest. I like a rising price with no downside trend as we approach results as usually post announcement we also drop. Always hope this time will be different. It hasn't been so yet.

Granted there's a wee bit of poetic license in describing a retrace lol

However in the run up to Results and assuming they are anticipated as good by the market it's not reassuring for sp to have gone down last 2 days. It's reminiscent of the usual anti-climax for anticipated news. Hope just for once that's wrong!
Let's see the sp rise into results and continue up next week. That would be a first actually.

It's embarrassing to see you fawn over mainly unsupportive comment.

I'll try some.....
It would be nice to see a rising share price in the run up to Results, wouldn't it. Lets see if we can arrest the retrace by Friday.

Suggest we leave it there as before you bring up another company example. The core point is a very basic one of good productive newsflow to the market and keeping investors updated. In terms of contract news we have stopped. Results and common sense asks why. END

Not often if at all. That's not the point. The point is that the market can derive a broad value of the contract and number of tests has been mentioned. Don't get bogged down in arguing over rns detail when it's easy enough to differentiate between a small medium or large contract.

So if a broad contract value can be derived then your point is null. That is the point I was making which means material contract rns would impact the sp all other things being equal and further detail therein would assist - if we ever announced anything!

I think Goggins was correct. You just don't seem to understand or take a step back into common sense. It would be more likely to increase shareholder value if in the last 18 months we had supplied contract newsflow for our landgrab and a narrative to the rise in nipt revenue just like all other companies do for must must appear to you to be strange reasons. lol Once upon a time we too announced contracts and my point isnt that we shouldnt be selective but that either there arent any worth announcing for 18 long months !! Needs explanation? or we are not prepared to - then why not? Needs explanation. You simply want to exvuse it and would rather not ask. If so I am dumbfounded.

Typo

Contracts will have a value ascribed or calculated etc.

P.s. value of a contract can be calculated and sp would react accordingly if details given, which they could be if we chose to and of course if we ever announced any contract wins in the first place but we don't!

Contracts will have a valid ascribed but not an exact value and it will usually be based on anticipated or known number of tests. It is this value which can be stated and I think occasionally has been. Contracts have a known value even if not a specific one . Much of what you say imv is simply hiding what could be stated if there was a will to do so. In isolation and ALL other things being equal then of course if a.n.other company issues multi million pound contracts over year(s) then the sp would benefit. I don't need to get into species of another company whose situation I know nothing about. Common sense tells us material contract wins with revenue should increase the sp no matter if you can find spefific example where it did not. That would be for spefic reasons too and the exception rather than the rule. Next you'll tell me the more revenue we make the lower the sp. Just use common sense rather than exceptional example.

Thanks for some supporting words Florida. Appreciated.

Yes, Eucligene can certainly be viewed in terms of a landgrab. It is NOT the landgrab I refer to as LR had stated after litigation settlement that with resources freed we could concentrate on a nipt landgrab. It is that landgrab to which I also have been refering and to which we may well be making progress as noted from results. My displeasure is with not informing shareholders or the market along the way for 18 months or thus not taking the time to add shareholder value with the names and financials this would highlight along the way. Don't get me wrong as it took me a year of silence before I really started to wonder why and now at 18 months! That others do not find this unusual with all the many aspects I have mentioned is more a reflection on them and fools like natdan. There may well be a plausible and fine explanation, but that I meet such resistance and utter stupidity (natdan) is as disappointing as it is predictable. Aimho

Nice to see a few thoughtful and considered posters remain (Florida, Gogins)

Typos

Winning new contracts as evidenced.
So why do we never announce anything

We clearly are winning not contracts as evidenced from the results. Do where never announce anything! Nobody has ever answered the question and would rather say it's ok. Absolutely bizarre when contract news and detail figs names can do nothing but help the share price.

Apart from goggins you are in the main a bunch of yes men, unwilling to look below the surface or take part in constructive criticism.

I'm content that my critical analysis has often been early and right and as such is always unlikely to reap praise from the zombie jobsworths.

Actually I've been right. First landgrab was not delivering. SL was not deluvering. Against strong opposition and attacjd i ead first to point this out and thank god someone could see it early on. I am and hsve been fully supportive of LR.

You on the other hand offer no insight other than to dig at me. Tell me something of value or point to anything you have ever said that's insightful about our investment?

When congratulations are in order I supply and when areas need improving I comment. Contract delivery like we have for any other company at our stage and in a landgrab would be unthinkable for so long. That's just common sense to arrive at.

Natdan: 60 Rns! Prat

The issue is ZERO for 18 months in a landgrab.

Nice to see all the other positives and sp ticking up. No issues with the improving picture, but nobody even want a to engage about our lack of commercial news on our core product. I suppose you're pleased we maintain silence. It would be another positive to add to the list if we had material contract news and details.

Now without typos.....

If contract rns are of little benefit, why don't all companies follow suit and save the rns fee. Just wait until revenue hits the bottom line and is reported in Results. Like we do!

Barking mad when figures and details we should know in a landgrab could propel the sp higher and earlier. Nobody is suggesting a flurry of rns for all wins. Material contracts, or cumulative wins with detail occasionally issued. The point is it is NOTHING for 18 long months in a landgrab without any explanation and if your view is the norm then this is without any question. Bizzare!!

I must ask all other companies why they bother to rns any contract wins. Just stay silent.

If contract rns are of little benefit, why don't all companies follow suit and save the end few. Just wait until revenue hits the bottom line and is reported in Results. Like we do!

Barking mad when figures and details we should know in a landgrab could propel the sp higher and earlier. Nobody is suggesting a flurry of rns for all wins. Selective material or cumulative wins with detail occasionally issued. The point is it is NOTHING for 18 long months in a landgrab without any explanation and if your view is the norm then without any question. Blizzard!!
I must ask all other companies why the bother!

Contract rns over 18 months ago had very little derail we were informed primarily because we were in litigation for most of that time and did not want to give financial or commercial details. That's not been an issue since settlement when we have stated we are in a landgrab - once again.
So like all other companies who win material contracts announce them with permitted detail. We should follow suit unless you can think of a reason remaining not to?

You fail to engage on the core obvious truth - ALL companies benefit from announcing contract wins that are notable. In our landgrab we gave not had even 1 rns contract win in 18 months. Frankly I am not interested if another company whose business and fundamentals I know nothing about doesn't see sp appreciation on contract rns. There could be lots of reasons like imminent cash call coming or x, y or z. In isolation I don't know why we cannot rns material contracts now with some detail and we are poorer for not doing so for such a long period. You fail to engage on the core - that it can't hurt to rns material contracts or shout about wins as it is a positive news item and material price sensitive contracts must be announced. It's not a good think to have 18 months and counting of silence and irrelevant to try to compare to a.n.other company and draw comparisons.

Well hopefully trurotrader having asked why the 18 month silence matters when the results and share price are announced. You now haves better understanding. Although I think it is common sense and ALL other companies announce notable contract wins. Imv it's blindingly obvious that it would assist shareholder value and yet nothing!!

I had hoped someone could ask at the previous presentation, in the q&a. Prrhaps thry fid, but alas the q&a was missing whrn ghevpresrntation was mafe publicly available. Still, pethaps someone will ask again he he upcoming presentations Q&A.

It's a valid question which after iro 18 months of silence (in a landgrab, ffs) deserves to be answered. Not just waiting for figs to trickle down to bottom line data at reporting time. There is a disconnect or does nobody have a scoobie

So.......

Why are we not announcing contracts for such a long period?
Clearly nothing big enough to be market sensitive and a positive bias not to announce let alone supply any detail.

It's not normal practice after such a long time and when, if you trmember, we are in a landgrab and I am surprised at anyone who thnks diffetently let alone not to think. Optibiotics for example dont follow our shy practices and most companies in a landgrab would shout about wins and give as much detail as allowed to enhance shareholder value. LH doesn't strike me as timid.

Absolutely. The progress made in winning contracts eventually becomes visible when results are published. Other companies announce contract wins for a reason and material wind must be announced. So I wonder why we are not getting materially market sensitive contracts? Neither are we announcing ANY respective names and numbers . We would have been even higher by now. Imv it's poor to have gone 18 months without a single or collective contract detail and just to allow the bottom line to report the progress months later. I wonder why other companies announce contracts when they could do the same!