RE: RNS 24/03/202231 May 2022 13:09
Hi BlahBlah thanks for your reply , dishonest and unwise seem a bit strong .
Perhaps you have not read my post on the 30th where I state " stock markets have to be seen to be free fair and transparent otherwise they cannot function " . You state that the details are made public in fact they are not , we know the seller but we do not know the recipient. I wonder why ? Could they be associated companies so the apparent 10% loss for the seller would have no impact we will never know .
OFF the market institutions can get together and formulate a price to impose ON the market. 1.5% of the free float changed hands for a 10% drop in the sp on opening triggering stop losses. Is that free and fair? It amounts to manipulation . RNS after close on 24th - book build - RNS 25th done and dusted . Rollocks
The RNS on the 24th is IMO disingenuous they effectively state that the book build dates are flexible . The word "build "would imply a gradual process . When that RNS was issued they must have known the recipients of the shares ,it is possible that privileged inside information was circulating amongst some individuals that the SP would be mugged by 10% imminently , I am sure that you would know what could be done with that info by an unscrupulous person. As now there was then some large movement in the sp just prior to the 24th. In the absence of an RNS from the company it would be unusual for the sp to fall by 6% at one stage yesterday. I recognize that if those shares were dumped on the it would probably have triggered a larger fall , but at least we could have all participated that's what stock markets are for.
ATB