Member Info for TraderBuckie

"A product recognised by the WHO"

Yes it was recognised by WHO when the SP was £1.20 as well.....!?

Didn't seem to help did it Caley from dropping to today's 3.2p to sell.

Kate....I am talikng about things that have already happened which are not hidden but are in plain sight.

You relentlessly knock me for some apparent "mistake" or "error" and yet always fail to acknowledge that you are in a situation far worse than mine.

It's like someone who couldn't run to the toilet without getting out of breath having a go at someone that has just ran a marathon but didn't run it in a particularly fast time.

"In acknowledging that you hot it wrong"

Explain what I got wrong? Not getting out further up at a higher price (in the same boat as you with that one so if I got it wrong so did you) or bailing out eventually at 12p for a loss (unlike you who is now nursing an even heavier loss since it is currently back at 3.2p to sell even with all this fantastic news flow.)

Please get things into context.....they ain't selling something because it is of value and it makes sense to sell it.....they are dismantling their company as it is broken....and they are getting as much for it as they can as they are desperate.

These arms of their company and sites which they are selling have been a disaster hence why they are where they are.

Now they don't think twice about getting their hats out and having a whip round to save this company (and their jobs lets not forget) so I think it is reasonable to ask them to buy some of these shares if they are obviously as dirty cheap as they claim. Let's face it they didn't think twice about bailing out around the £1.00 area.

I will read the next set of financials with interest.

The directors want/need this SP to start going north so guess what will be coming out of their gobs going forward.....words like "significant" and "potential" etc. etc.

Be nice to see a few of them wade in and buy a "significant" amount of their own shares if they are that certain the future is so bright.

If you went to the races and bet on two races and in race 1 you lost and in race 2 you won then after the event....using "hindsight".....you would say that you made a good decision with picking a horse for race 2 but got it wrong for race 1. Nobody is saying you are armed with hindsight at the point of making the bets....if anything you are actually using foresight at the time of placing the bet, a calculated guess as to the outcome of the race.

"Hindsight" simply allows you to look back and assess your performance. So in hindsight I am pleased I took a calculated guess that ODX was going to continue to fall and sold ODX at 12p.

My question is are you happy you held until now and do you think that was wise now you are armed with hindsight?

Yes, that is how you judge history Kate.............with the advantage of having hindsight.

and on reflection using hindsight you can judge who got it right and who got it wrong.

Though some people simply won't accept what is obvious and factual.

I agree Kate that your position could improve and if the share goes up far enough your decision to hold may turn out to be justified....and a wiser decision than mine.

You have to acknowledge however that in "real time" as of "the here and now" you are not in a better position and it would have been more advisable to sell at 12p. The reality is if you sold at 12p you could have returned today and bought 4 times the number of stock that you held when you sold out at 12p. That's just simple logical mathematics. Even averaging down couldn't improve your position better than bailing out and returning when the stock has had a 75% reduction in value.

No...you like me should have sold all of our holding way up there and then left well alone.

What bothers me is that we didn't, however I bailed at a heavy loss at 12p and you remained in yet seem to want to take the high ground suggesting you have got it right. That's it in a nutshell.

Yes it's frank.......you are still alive.

Kate-If only you had sold all of your shares then as opposed to still holding a load now at 3.3p

Kate......I cannot be ars*d to look back through your posts, and really don't care truth be told. I know you are sitting on shares worth 3.3p and are keep having snide remarks about me selling at 12p which i think is bizarre.

It's like Frank Bruno giving boxing advice to Mohammed Ali.

"and my previous posts I sold some shares at £1.08"

Wow....late to the game with that info Kate....some may even doubt that it is the truth as you would have mentioned it a long time ago.

Anyhow it doesn't really matter does it what we all post on here....it is all irrelevant really. Anyone can post anything they want after the event. The only thing to focus on is your trading account and that should be your priority.

and let's not forget you haven't sold at all yet Kate so 3.3p is the best you can return as of today.

Absolutely.....that sentiment goes for all of us.

Remember my first trip I did sell around the £1.00 and did make around £13K.

Getting back in for a second bite was my mistake.

I ain't got an issue with the ramps and you can sense the excitement some may be feeling by their perception that "corners have been turned" but come on guys......the stock is up from 3.1p to sell to the dizzy heights of 3.3p to sell. (Remember this stock has changed hands at £1.20 in the past)

You are at the bottom of a very large mountain but I agree if you manage to get to base camp (6p / 7p) it will be good.

So I am rooting for you but let's keep it real.

Caley2.....my post recognizes and considers a reasonable 10 to 20% increase.

Your post however is straight out of the matrix and is in the realms of fantasy.

What board of directors doesn't want their share price to increase? just because they aim for a certain price don't mean it will achieve that price. Don't forget there is also a massive trust issue with this board of directors who you yourself have commented on many many times.

Associate.....I feel like you think i am a law firm.

Answer....Nope, I don't know.

Maybe one of my associates will be able to enlighten you.

The problem with a stock which is so low in value and has such a spread is that once you have bought say at 3.6p then the bid price (3.3p) needs to go up 10% merely to allow you to get at break-even.

So you need it to go up from your purchase price at least 20% to make a decent profit of say 10%.

Good luck Oaky.

That Spread bet outfit buying a tranche was interesting. Don't know what to make about that.