RE: ENET29 Sep 2021 07:45
It does state as clearly as possible what the funds are for.
"providing additional working capital to allow the Company to support the growth and delivery of the recently secured contracts and engagements for its 5G offering towards successful field deployments"
This is supported by the presentation that details multiple contract opportunities. The detail we lack is the functions and investment/development required by Ethernity. That's because we have no indication how these OEM deals work. We are told by Marc that Ethernity are not a hardware company, they don't make hardware so it leaves us none the wiser as to who does and the cost to whom.
This fund raiser is £11.6m or so which is huge. All said the average price will be around 45p a share assuming a 90% take up of 60p warrants.
Not great value for us and the timing was appalling given the share price momentum at the time. 60-70p was inevitable given the interest.
Obviously these things take time to organise and it's unfortunate for shareholders but it's part of the risk.
I am more focused on what £11.6m buys.
This year has been excellent for the company and after starting with a vague coming soon outlook we now have sales and contracts that will produce more sales, many more sales.
The presentation was revealing. The DU can provide 3-5000 card sales. So we are talking about Europe national deployments by that size or partial deployment on a National US network.
These contracts between the server vendors and their clients are gaining momentum now and really a announcement is near term. The numbers will be around $5m a throw and multiple in nature. I still believe that we'll see design fees of around $2m.
TietoEvry collaboration has sparked my interest again as the UPF China market is maturing and China can't move forward adding compute. I know that we'll get a Private network Contract very soon with TietoEvry as Integrator which will produce around 2000 card sales. There should be many more in the pipeline. The difference between China and US is that China really has no option but to move rapidly.