Member Info for TorquayFan

Thanks to Timbo for these comments on ADVFN :-

''I attended the SharesMag event last night (slides and video will follow).

I spoke to CH before and after the event, he told me before the meeting that this presentation was aimed mainly at potential investors who were not very familiar with the company.

There was nothing new in any of the slides as far as I could ascertain and there were only around 5 minutes at the end for Q&A (I asked about the merits of Trigrid vs nano-vesicles). The meeting was quite well attended (60 - 70), but needless to say there is an inevitable overlap between the Proactive attendees and those at the Sharesmag meetings. However, there was quite a diverse collection of companies presenting, so there will have been quite a few there who would have been unfamiliar with the Scancell story.''

Hope that helps . . .

C7 as a result of your email we might get a copy of CH's comments so well done for that. It seems these Meets are routinely recorded. You never know what might be in it I suppose, but remember CH was probably talking to 'newbies' Scancell wise.

I did not post that your email was a waste of time or a complete waste of time - please be accurate. This was my comment : ''I understand lately that CH has been referring PI enquiries to FTI - IMO this is the correct procedure and avoids embarassing situations such as people posturing as having special knowledge or contacts.''

I also posted that you might indeed get a reply as you did. BFN

Shocking to see that C7.
I thought that there was more awareness of the dangers of sun exposure in recent times, but that stat does suggest otherwise. ATB

DA - further to the tweet you linked, here's more on the Boehringer acquisition of Amal. Staggering amounts of money around atm !

https://pharmaphorum.com/news/boehringer-buys-immunotherapy-biotech-amal-therapeutics/?

WF - 15.28. Thanks for that Inovio link - Inovio used to be discussed a lot here. I see Dr Kim puts a good spin on that reversal (as always) - let's see how it goes. Regarding C7's claim some years ago, he stated that there was a Group of 6 or so receiving regular private updates - neither individuals nor content specified.

DA - 15.48. We've had an update already - CH was to present that update to a new audience this evening - presenting 'an' update not a 'latest' or 'new' update. But in Moonparty's 16.17 - ''As the presentation is out of trading hours, they could provide new price sensitive information so long as an RNS is issued before the market opens tomorrow.'' Worth a look. Good post.

Ruck - 14.31. Yes I remember Researcher's post too, relatively recently.

Crumbs 15.28. Yes the info. about 'head and neck' was helpful.
Crumbs 17.37. Remember SCLP is a 'Public' Company. Anything disclosed at AGM Q & A is fine. I too prefer a Company to communicate fully with ALL Shareholders.

I'm very surprised that you Guys don't remember the protracted discussion I had with C7. At the time I also suggested that the BB should nominate one or two of the more knowledgeable Contributors to ask questions on our behalf - I had Inan/Berm in mind - so that questions could be targeted more helpfully.

Just to note that in the C7 letter to Cliff/Chris yesterday, he's asked about the timing of a Tweet and there's one suggestion about a video. That's it !

Which takes me back to this in 07.08 - ''I understand lately that CH has been referring PI enquiries to FTI - IMO this is the correct procedure and avoids embarassing situations such as people posturing as having special knowledge or contacts.''

Anyway let's hope for an RNS today and some blue too ! GLA

I Calvert - yep good idea. Cool !

If X = 5 (years) - when I come back, the SP might have reached 64 p !!

(Actually, I'm much more bullish than that) . . .

RW you are quite wrong there. My memory is absolutely clear on the subject. C7 was claiming that a group of Posters were receiving regular private updates by email.
It's your knee jerk defence that's the ****. Let it go . . .

Of course there may be a new detail in CH's address this evening. But whilst I share enthusiasm for 'news', actually, this latest Twitter message doesn't IMO promise any. We've had an update already - CH is to present that update to a new audience this evening - presenting 'an' update not a 'latest' or 'new' update.

However - exciting news can still arrive anyday !

C7 - I am certainly in this respect, a prominent 'mutterer' as you put it. As for, ''a lack of trust and respect to the ones keeping in touch'' in this case, you - well yes, put me at the top of that list ! I well remember a few years ago you causing significant embarassment to the BoD and RG in particular, claiming that you and others were in regular receipt of private email updates on a regular basis. You were then well out of order and I protested loudly at the time. You were irresponsible in making such claims and after that, you have no right to claim 'trust' from the BB in this respect.

I understand lately that CH has been referring PI enquiries to FTI - IMO this is the correct procedure and avoids embarassing situations such as people posturing as having special knowledge or contacts.

You may of course get a reply to your, IMO completely pointless latest missive to Cliff Holloway - but he is Cliff not Chris remember ?

Hi. re . . . . . ''don't think I'll have the patience to hold for a long time''.

It's a digger ain't it ? Imagine if you'd been holding for years, lose patience and later the SP hits e.g. 64p again. Meantime, invested elsewhere, you do no better.

I'm there till an uprate of some magnitude and I DO believe it's coming, hopefully.

ATB

Bombe shell news about our former Poster, Alan Turing, who is to feature on the back of the new GBP50 note ! Congratulations to him !

Some time since he posted though . . . .

RayP/RW - yes it's the breadth and complexity of Scancell's science together with Prof. Lindy's thirst to make improvements that explains why the Scancell project can be perceived as progressing so slowly. WF - glad you can be so relaxed about the long wait - some of us older ones don't want to run out of time LOL. So I'm somewhat impatient myself with the SP at this level. ATB.

Thanks C7 and Gilders - I suppose one never knows what may come out of this meeting.

What a mix - Identity intelligence solutions, Insolvency litigation, Audiovisual technology and our Peerless Scancell !

A change from ProActive to A J Bell ?

The Investors Show on July 17th ? Is that a ProActive event ? Any link to ?

Just for you - my hot tip of the Year -
Martin Diggle to take over from JC as Non Exec Chair ? (wink)

Here's to a blue week indeed C7 !

As you are on the 'dark side' already, I couldn't possibly comment.
Diplomacy you know !

Well we might win the cricket and the F1 - but I fear not the tennis this year.
10 hour drive, knackered - back to the 'live' text on the cricket.
Good jolly night to you.

Ruck please don't mention the cricket again - I'm on BBC live text ! However, an interesting post from Gooosed again . . .

''A few years ago Paul Rennert was quoted on several occasions on LSE BB & at that time the quotes were dismissed out of hand. The reason being that he (Rennert) was at that time pro Checkpoint Inhibitors (CI's) & therefore not relevant to Scancell. The irony being that the future of Scancell's Immunobody platform is now very much entwined with CI's. Recently Scancell tweeted :

https://twitter.com/scancellpharma/status/1136705908799672323

Immuno-oncology as we all know is still relatively new. It's an expanding area of research. The temptation to bat for Scancell regardless of emerging science may come across as overly defensive...''

Just a thought.

Interesting comments C7 - my 'ole Dictionary, which is just a bit younger than me, gives several definitions of the word including, ''become similar through influence of environment'', or ''come together'', or ''bring to a point''.

To quote somewhere else, (Berm), ''all sorts of combinations and playing around with CAR T in solid tumours is going on right now. They have even designed a CAR T that secretes PD-L1 - one step on from a combination. Amazing stuff going on.''

Now I won't pretend to understand any of the science but it does seem that Immunotherapy generally is in launch above the 'pad' already.

The semantic point is that rather than the science converging 'on' or 'to' Scancell the fact may become clear that the science IS converging and there will be progress. And there's a good chance that Scancell will be relevant, or more than that. It is exciting that's for sure.

(Chester - still a Member of Team Positive too.)

C7 why not consider looking 'elsewhere' yourself ? It's not that bad (Loz filtered) and even 'Terror' Gawd bless him, linked a 'The Three Degrees' YouTube the other day. I mean - WHAT are things coming to ??

Onwards and upwards and GLA Come on England !!

No C7 I was not ''picky to whatever (you) post??'' I was just dealing with a few of your points.

'on topic' was no swipe - I thought my post had added to the discussion and was therefore 'on topic'.

No disdane - I am delighted you are much better but this is the Scancell BB for share discussion and other than in passing, IMO such personal matters are not appropriate to the SCLP BB. You have your LSE M8's on email no doubt.

BTW I'm not putting you on filter.

My sincere condolencies for the loss of your Brother.

Now where's my grumpy hat ? TCOY.

Ruck you are very hard on yourself - I don't think that crown was ever yours !

Hi Inan - I think the point is simply being made that there will soon be a wide range of Immunotherapies to attack cancer - fair enough. Of course, the cost per Patient of a Combo is already substantial and to add a CAR-T element to that - ouch!

We are not the only vaccine Company in the race but let's hope Moditope will trump all - forgive that word.

My guess is that in the fullness of time, Vaccines and Checkpoint inhibitors will prevail and CAR-T will be in reserve if required . . just a guess.

ATB and thanks again for your recent help in UK