RE: Success24 Sep 2022 21:55
Theo and all our other readers to this LSE page,
I had my own doubts on Pensana when the plan changed from bfs and just a mining company. I thought it was to be complicated and risky. I ended up buying back a few days later when it was a cheaper price, but also, I had changed my opinion that it was pointless giving rare earth ores to China at knocked down value prices. The MRES sulphate work also convinced me the company was on to something. I ended up doubling my investment. I know Paul Atherley can be frustrating as he owns 5% of the company and strays from being a typical Chairman to a shareholder who has bet the house on his favourite baby. Paul has worked for years in China, and he knows their strategy and how they operate. To his credit he has read their every move with Rocky also pointing out what they are likely to do next. The company has also had to deal with a green washing brigade and managing to avoid those mistakes, but it cost the company time to avoid that elephant trap. The FEED work was a lot more complicated as they got into it and the company persevered and what was annoying was being told unrealistic deadlines as if we were all children. It would have been better to say that FEED found a dozen problems and they were working through them all to give the correct design and it was like Tennyson's poem of flower in a crannied wall and hence it was May before it was all done for Saltend and we learn later they are still finishing mine designs and hopefully they will improve NdPr recoveries.
The fact is that the project itself has got better and it has created a lot more value and it is noticeable that competition has responded to what Pensana has been doing. I am hoping after Friday that Kwasi is ringing up a few UK billionaires and say we gave you a promising budget, now can you demonstrate your intelligence and financial power to grow the UK economy by supporting business and products that propels the UK onto the global stage and point them to what is going on for example at Saltend and other places he visited. The pressure is on those who can make a difference and that we get say a number of projects funded. If a group of billionaires sponsored a programme of 10 projects, it would only take two to succeed in a big way to cover the funding of all 10 and if they got 6 out of 10 winners, they would want to repeat the exercise over and over again. Kwasi needs to set up his committee of the intelligent generous wealthy and then the whole of the UK can see if Truss and company are really onto something. The problem everywhere is that a lot of detail is hidden from us. It is partly to protect the identity of individuals, commercial in confidence material and finally awareness of international competition. For these reasons we do not always get the transparency we want in this sector. Tony