The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Why do you feel the need to post this?
Shameful isn't the word. It's immoral.
It's capitalism at its worst. Not just making money from the decline in stock value but actively and incessantly
attacking it because the mechanism to profit from it exists.
The shorters on here probably have bets on nuclear war and Armageddon too.
Cynical, lowlife, sad little boys.
Good balanced post Joe, I think most will agree with your sentiments here.
Mark. It's another alter ego used to self-fellate the main account.
Suggest you filter the following as they are all the same bloke feigning different aliases to stock bash and troll.
- C26, we all know and love
- Stille, the primary fluffer
- Mike6767, the secondary fluffer
- kontrariankiks, the demo/lite version of C26
- theanswerisno, the village idiot
- atinofpaint, the village idiot in English.
Obvious negative projection and more uncited lies.
You both sound familiar.
Ignoring my questions speaks volumes.
That's what I bring to the table. Calling out your lies directly.
You ignore it every time.
Blocked.
Answer my questions and I'll answer yours.
Congratulations on 2k posts 26.
You've proven that if you throw enough **** at a wall, some of it will stick.
For clarity, this is how to cite evidence 26.
Sending someone else on a goose chase to prove a claim that you made up makes your point look very weak indeed.
Using carpy's post as an example. Can you cite evidence for the claims you made regarding the following:
- you claimed AML already lost the court case. Not evidenced to date.
- you claimed the Valkyrie build rate in the Q1 results was the total number built. Not evidenced to date. AML confirmed it was the number built in Q1.
- you quoted Moers as having some sort of outburst upon leaving. Not evidenced to date.
-'Valkyrie still doesn't work'. Not evidenced to date.
FYI, Karenable and the comment section of an armchair f1 blogger doesn't count as evidence.
Both have paywalls.??
You must have lost another braincell and forgotten that most of us mere mortals can't get subs on expenses.
Keep trying.
C26 13/06/22 17:21
'Thanks, but it's behind the paywall.'
It's not for me to do the footwork qualifying your claims, sorry.
C26 - Today 14:18.
'Either way, not to be trusted.'
Do tell us what makes you so trustworthy?
You sit here sniffing your own farts all day demanding answers from 'all the rampers' but can't cite evidence for the claims you make when directly questioned. Some memory joggers for you:
- you claimed AML lost the court case but provide no source
- you claimed the Valkyrie build rate in the Q1 results was the total number built but provided no source. AML confirmed it was the number built in Q1.
- you quoted Moers as having some sort of outburst upon leaving, but did not provide a source as it was clearly pulled from your arse.
You are the least trustworthy and most shysty poster on this board.
Joe,
Everyone in the industry and supply chain will be bound by agreements and codes of conduct that demand information be treated with integrity. The aim of this is for the company to retain control of the information released to the public and it's competitors.
You can only go by the companies accounts and quarterly reports. This information is legally regulated.
Anything else is pure speculation. No matter how much they spin their opinion as fact.
*losing
.... and answerisnonce
And contrariankiks. All 4 in 1 day.
Welcome back shorter gang. ?
*DOUBLE STANDARDS ALERT*
A factory tour isn't the only way a human can enter a factory.
Getting desperate 26?