Member Info for Toffers

https://caseboard.io/

del you need to take a months subscription to case board, and you can then see the pleadings. I think from memory it's £36, but you can cancel at any time. I see peaceonearth is now harassing me elsewhere. They really do want me out of the way, so you can all make of that what you want. Please do look at the pleadings, and then you can draw your own conclusions about iknownuffin and his mate peaceonearth.

should say whether or not the company should have replaced the certificates with or without indemnity insurance, given that circumstances changed due to the war, but I think you get the gist.

read the particulars of claim as clearly you haven't done so! The particulars also make it very clear when discussions started about the matter.

pwlx, do you not understand? they have asked for damages in the pleadings, those damages are unquantifiable because as they have stated, the Judge would need to determine how many shares they might have sold whilst being without the certificate and at what price. You are misleading people to say there are no damages, because they've pleaded it in the particulars of claim, they ask firstly that a decision be made about the replacement of the certificate, and if they win their argument, they have then asked for damages, pure and simple, and if they win on the first argument, then they will win on damages, and they will also recoup legal costs, and that applies for both parties.

I think most of what I've written bears out.
I agree I should not have inserted the word revert, but as for the rest, it's been playing out in front of your eyes for years! Any one cottoned why Queeld after 5 years of 'litigation' haven't had their share certificate replaced as yet? And if they win their case, the damages will be colossal bearing in mind that holding. And then there's Mispare's as well! Damages alone could well bankrupt the company if the company are only holding £4 mill or less which is accessible. So what else could Queeld take in lieu of cash? a transfer of directors shares?
Queeld Ventures Limited Holding 10.75% 307,250,000

it will revert to private company status

what DFS?!!!!! Why do you think the Russian State became involved?!

Del, the company never intended to sell anything. March 2015 they stated they had two interested parties for the sale of MT, yet nothing happened. They then went on to raise monies from unsuspecting investors, giving it large that they had interest, one preferred party, special dividend likely, Nomad joining in and bigging it up about a massive dividend when he should have done his job and kept his trap shut, in the meantime Churakov was messing about with his shares and company said they weren't aware (oh yeh!), the mystery investor, why were investors never informed who it was? the mysterious resignation of Irelands as Nomad, and without notice, the nail biting down to the wire to find another Nomad, and this shower comes on Board, the raising of the $35 mill which seems to have disappeared without trace, the splitting of the nickel business in to subsidiary companies located offshore in Cyprus, monies being held offshore in Cyprus, the 'disappearance' of Dmitry who is busy in Hong Kong with his investment company and makes no mention of Eurasia any more on his linkedin profile, the involvement of the State, the monouvrability of assets, and monies, strangely just before the war was announced, and the litigation commenced, and the removal of Dmitry from the Board at that time. Then, ongoing litigation which not once did the company inform investors about from 2018 to 2022, when having had enough, Mispare and Queeld issued High Court proceedings. As if that wasn't enough, then another High Court case appears against the company by Logik and Logik Ltd. It's a sad state of affairs, but the more you open your eyes, the more it becomes evident that investors were had and this was simply a vehicle for raising monies for the Board and management teams own pockets. If they had a shred of credibility left they would at the very least relinquish their huge salaries until the war is over and there is something concrete to report on a sale, but they won't even do that. Finally, Del has managed to pin point the fact of an inaccuracy, and no doubt the Board were waiting for this, and the Nomad will be the scapegoat, which I suspect has been the plan all along. That means suspension, and it won't come back. And the FCA continue to protect no-one in the quagmire infested swamp called AIM!

JPM's

Is this the last of the shorts being helped out? Anyone have latest figures?

Look at those 2 millions on repeat!

MMs gone fishing again. Has anyone got stops on? Is it really worth the risk?

Wonder if they want to get news in to the press and social media for this special weekend, gives the market the long weekend to digest it. Fingers crossed.

May be Shaun will negotiate a greater % share for us in a JV with Newmont? plus hopefully, a special dividend!

Not sure how that applies? There is a contractual agreement between Newcrest and Greatland. That will become null and void as that contract doesn't apply to Newmont, they were not a contracting party. You can't just take one party off a contract and add a new party in, there would have to be a fresh contract, which means fresh terms, which will hopefully be in Greatland's favour!

Have listened to the recent Donald Leggett interview with Shaun, and now the Liam interview too, I believe Shaun Day is absolutely genuine when he says he wants what is best for shareholders as well as for the company and it's expansion of course, so I'm happy to think he will have our backs, and what ever is proposed, will be good for us, as well as him and the Board.

The Nomad is a complete liability! He should not have signed the rns off with such a gross error. Incompetence at it's finest. Well spotted Del.

I agree with Wolfe. Wasn't there a poster a few weeks ago who came on late at night and was spamming the board incessantly. The grammar and hurriedness of the writing style reminds me of whoever that handle was. I don't think it's Grannysnuffer either.

May be we should moot together mr nuffin at the Middle Temple moot semi finals on 26 June? Then again, perhaps not, as it would be embarassing to lose with an amateur in toe!