Member Info for Toffers

Out of those two, my preference would be wolfie :)

the ramping crew spearheaded by mac and gmf78 left long ago upon taking their humungous wedges at around 38-40p leaving the rest of us high and dry. it's not that peeps were necessarily to blame for their own downfalls, but if you are busy with other things, you can't sit and watch every movement constantly, and this lot have a well rehe****d habit of collapsing the sp like a pack of cards within hours. those that are working this at the moment, are a different crew, who are simpy trading it, whilst also working their other jobs for their employers! had an interesting discussion on this with someone the other day who informed me that he visits houses regularly where the people are in paid employment, but also working their own self employment which their paid employment employer doesn't realise! this is why people need to be forced to go back to work in offices so that employers can see what's going on! also, for transport infrastructure, which may well be lost otherwise, but that aside, the annoying tribe that are here at the moment, are clearly trading this, and if they make £100 a day from doing so, then it's not a bad little earner on top of a salary is it! i really hope their paid employment bosses find out though, and the tax man! nite wolfie :)

Come on spikey, you used to be here ad lib! You don't get to 23,000+ posts for nothing! Nite.

Advise what exactly? that the file is still open if the company have any instructions? get real. I've seen what goes on with this sort of thing!

I've been trying to tell you all how damaging litigation is, but no one listens. That article backs this up. I've seen it countless times as to how damaging it is and the people that suffer most at the end of it are the ordinary shareholders, who stand to lose their investment. For the company it will be pride, that's why they usually won't settle, and pride never pays. If I were advising Eurasia, although thankfully I'm not, I'd be insisting they make an offer and quickly to settle, an open offer, on the basis that if the claimants agree to give an undertaking to the court to cover the indemnity position by knowing that if they fall foul, they will be back before the Judge, then give them their replacement certificates but strictly on the basis that that is the end of their claim, and no further claims can be made and each party to bear their own costs. Get an open offer in, as legal costs mount tremendously as you head towards the trial, and so it's always advisable and wise, to get an open offer in asap as it puts the claimants on the back footing, in that they then run the risk of having to pay the defendants costs if they should not win their case outright. This never should have got to court IMO, someone should have made all the parties bang their heads together in a mediation session and resolve it. My views.

Do you honestly believe UBS were actively doing anything? it's one thing to open a file, another to actually be actively working on it!

Https://gowlingwlg.com/en/insights-resources/articles/2022/impact-of-litigation-on-company-value-study/

Https://www.accountancyage.com/2019/09/02/icaew-chief-warns-of-further-audit-walk-outs-to-protect-reputation/

It's clear the crew are now sending for reinforcements, pretty bad ones, they are scraping the barrel now!

DShox, you have missed out the most FUNDAMENTAL point, the Judge has not thrown the case out, so the Judge must think it has merit, so that it can be heard. You plonker. Leave it to the lawyers. Amnesia all round for DShox!

Mont, you conveniently forgot to represent the full facts which is that they got an offer of indemnity insurance for a 30 day period, upon which it would expire if not taken up. They sent the details to the company for them to approve and sign and they did nothing, and so the 30 day period expired, and then after that, the war intervened, and so no one would offer indemnity insurance.

Mincho, wondered when you would appear, another multi moniker.

So, either the auditors won't audit and that's that, or the Nomad walks, and that's that. Let's see. My views of course. Out for the rest of the day now so won't be answering the crew.

Stuff to do now and time for a brew. Taraaa.

It's really none of your business OTBW, but do you know how much fees are? The course fees for two years part time are not cheap and halls of residence alone are narly 1k per month, and at my age, I really don't fancy living in halls of residence with shared washingmachine facilities, would you? so that means either renting or buying, none of which is cheap in the Bournemouth area, plus I still have my own home to pay the usual utility bills for etc. And that is without food etc. Hope you now understand as I haven't kept you in the dark like the BOD do on vital information!

Are you ok?

Toffers had the sense to recover 150k though whereas the rest of you have stayed in and watched it decline further by another 10p+! Now, who is the idiot! Then you desperately hang on to sale news. There will be no sale for three reasons, they didn't accomplish it in the 7 years prior to the war, the war itself, and now the High Court litigation. They haven't completed the Rosgeo matter because the metals will remain in Russia and the government wasn't going to risk them being sold to UK or Europe in any way shape or form. Britain is an unfriendly territory, so do you think the Russian government really want British shareholders to benefit from anything now? I think I know who should be on a psychiatric ward, and it isn't me! My views of course.

Partly true seasick, but we invest based on the information given, and not on the information that is withheld that should have been given, so that investment strategies can be reviewed comfortably. That hasn't happened here, we've been kept in the dark about so many things and the only people benefitting from it is the Board, who should be held to account. The cloak and dagger operation has gone on for far too long. My views.

This is Toffers. Toffers who was INVITED to train for the judiciary, so put that in your pipe and smoke it.

News was due 8 years ago in 2015 when they said they had two interested parties for MT yet sold absolutely nothing! Get a life oriens.

Pompal, how dare you. You are the lowest of the low. You are referring to incestuous behaviour. What a sad little individual you are. My father held a B.Sc in economics from LSE, my brother is a professor, how dare you. It's thanks to my parents both my brother and I are well educated, unlike you clearly.

By the way Del, I've rung the company before to get the answering machine. From the discussion others have had since, Keith doesn't divulge anything, obviously, so it seems pointless to go that route. It's gone beyond that in reality I think, as genuine shareholders have already realised. My views. Time for a brew now. Rums all round for those who like to start early tut tut!

This is a chat forum about a share appertaining to a company we are or have been invested in. Why do you have to come out with such disgusting and non sensical rubbish such as that? Did your mother or whoever really bring you up to speak to people like that? Clearly they did, and they should be ashamed.