RE: Investigation into Tom Richardson24 Jan 2024 16:17
thought i'd just have a peer in, but see finwitt is still provaricating with absolute *******s! the fca are not equipped to do large scale investigations, this is why they hand matters over to the sfo, if the bother at all. the sfo then only take the "top tier" cases where they know they can get a result. without solid concrete evidence you haven't got a cat in hells chance here. furthermore, the sfo take on average 6 years to conduct an investigation and bring it to fruition, so where will all you be with your investment in 6 years time?
there is a route that is much quicker and i will help you, but don't know why i am, when you are all so nasty to a fellow poster who was holding at the time. you need to marry up what has been said in interim and year end accounting reports. i haven't looked so i'm not in the know, but if you can find discrepancies between what was said by the bod or their financial advisors was supposedly happening and yet wasn't, you need to produce a clear list of each and every discrepancy and why you think it is so, and whether you therefore think the company's accountants, but more importantly, whether the auditors, who endorse the year end accounts, have failed to ensure that an accurate picture of the company's financial health had been given. if, you can show that there are financial discrepancies, such as the auditors made mistakes for instance, then you can submit a report to the financial reporting council (frc), and if they accept it, they will have a team of barristers who will work on it.
be careful of listening to those who would like to have you believe that thy have your interests at heart, cloed shop tg groups, in my experience, only look after themselves, and often make a mess of it to boot. all my views. ciao.
Sign In
Follow the stocks
