Member Info for Tobythedog

Fyoz

Except that if you look and Geng's chart it never did bounce off any support at 1.2p or anywhere else for the matter. Still never let the facts get in the way of a good story eh!

Wonga FC

Why? His work is done. QED sp traded on an intra-day basis at 1p in fact it went below between 10.00hrs and 15.00 hrs on 7/6/23. Check the one hours bars.

Good news this morning! More onwards and upwards from here.

Bulp

When did you receive this reply - today?

Jason presented today as a lot happier and with a polished presentation. There's a lot going on. As always I'm left confident about the technology, IP and R & D and that in time MSAR/BIOMSAR/MSAR ZERO will be taken up commercially and will likely become very big indeed. However as a shareholder my concerns remain about ever meeting meeting a deadline and running out of cash before revenues are received meaning we could either be bought out on the cheap or diluted out of existence. No change there then!

Well as long as you have an open mind and listen to a few presentations I think it will start to make sense and prove itself of value. Now I'm certainly not saying it works all the time, it does not even have to be 50% of the time but combined with control of the risks as a trader you can improve your hit rate and make more money. You may believe it is akin to witchcraft but there are a heck of a lot of individual, professional and institutional traders that use it successfully. Let me put it the other way back at you , if fundamental analysis is so good and cannot be improved by TA why aren't all fundamental analysts the richest people in the world.

I'm sure there are some pure TA traders who don't look at the fundamentals but I'm not that brave I want the best leverage I can get by using both.

Yes it's called a lagging indicator. It's not a crystal ball!

You state "absolute nonesense " as if it is fact. Isn't it that you just don't understand; but you're right we are on our way up i.e. there has been a pivot point and you've just recognised it! Well done we'll make a technical analyst out of you yet.

To those of you that continually mock technical analysis and call out Noel S why do you constantly ignore the facts? QED SP did on an intra-day basis go to 1p in fact it went below between 10.00hrs and 15.00 hrs on 7/6/23. Check the one hours bars.

Obviously am pleased about this morning's announcement - hopefully it's onward and upwards from here.

Gr1bbler

Thanks. for the quick response. Words fail me. Just when you think it could not get any worse then that's exactly what happens!

Gg1bber

Your 10.28 post Are you quoting direct from IR department ? Also when did you receive this please?

Barking C & Dai

I have no real experience but know enough that you need a logistics company to handle the process including crating, documentation, taxes/duty, shipping, handling and delivery. So no you can't just stick it on a lorry!

However as a longstanding (and large for me) shareholder I'm really hacked off at yet another avoidable screw up which can be laid fairly and squarely at the door of QED. The very survival of the company is in jeopardy. They should have checked and re-checked the equipment and carried relevant spares and/or duplicate test equipment. There is more than a whiff of incompetence here. JM needs to deliver right now.

gulfharbour

Wrong way round I'm afraid. You need to own the stock at close the night before ex div date in order to qualify.

As you say very balanced and fair. Thanks

AKHM

Yes I understand the SP would rise substantially in your scenario but still to no where near it's ultimate potential should the whole market swiftly move to MSAR/BioMSAR.

Vince
Agreed, they did dissolve the alliance but that was I think after the sale of Seago Istanbul. I know if I was in the position that Maersk was at the time of the sale I would want to keep my options open by negotiating a quid pro quo access to the LONO test results achieved by MSC.

Prep H
....yeh but this bloke in the pub did he tell you what Soren is running it on? BioMSAR?

I'm not sure if this has been discussed previously but is it likely that when Maersk agreed to sell the Seago Istanbul (now MSC Leandra) that there is a side agreement to share the performance figures with Maersk and if favourable to jointly switch to MSAR/BioMSAR. I'm speculating I know but given that Maersk has already done a partial U turn on fitting of scrubbers perhaps they could be about to do the full U turn based on good LONO results. If MSC and Maersk were to jointly go to market advocating either MSAR or BioMSAR then the momentum would be unstoppable. Equally my fear in this scenario is that we would quickly get bought out by (Shell?) at a fraction of the true value. Thoughts anyone?

Wonga FC
Some big sales showing, and I don't see buying pressure. More like the opposite.

ColdFishPie

The World is full of great guys; they're paid handsomely to get a result, and so I'm not sure about the first sentence but certainly agree the remainder!

ALL
I've seen very little discussion on our blend on board solution. As far as I can see it was first mentioned in October last year and there is next to no detail about it. Can anyone point me in the direction of a decent description of what has been done in this area? What need is it addressing and why now? Would Nouryon chemicals still be required with this set-up? Does anyone know? Thanks

manu19/semaphorRed
I agree however there are also the jointly held patents with Nouryon for the processes and formulas.

manu19

With a current market cap of £22M we are just pocket change to the likes of MSC, so I really doubt that's the reason. Strategically it makes more sense for an oil major (Shell?) to buy us, but that's unlikely unless or until we go commercial.