Member Info for Titanasaurus

In reply to Keith Oz.

There is No statement from company that 100% proven commercial flowing gas has been discovered anywhere .if there is please link it.

There is no statement from company that confirms 100% GCOS for proven commercial viability in any Guercif sands, if there is please link it.

“Potential investors should always check the facts behind any statement here. Please note that the Company has made it very clear that information on social media can be inadvertently or even deliberately misleading, and urged investors to rely only on statements in an RNS and the Company's official X account.”

You always revert to insults when you are called out !

Only 2 ?

Here are just a few previous statements, can anyone verify these were correct ?

Guercif will make every family in Morocco wealthy

Guercif will be the next Ghawar

Predator will be known by every person in Morocco.

Guercif will change the entire European gas supply chain

Guercif will be in a supermajors portfolio by 2025

Special dividends will be paid by 2025

Certain M and A because of Guercif by 2025

There is not a better chance to discover wealth making gas globally than Guercif

There is not a better gas prospect to invest in globally than Guercif

Mou1 is the prime location

Mou2 is the prime location

Mou3 is the prime location

Mou4 is the prime location

Mou5 is without doubt the prime location

The doors will be blown off into space by Guercif

Never mind, it’s all intentional so we can delineate !

We are hiding the real data so as not to let Middle East private equity and supermajors know to much .

All above gleefully corroborated , reposted and endorsed by his minion.

Please refer to statement from company.

“Potential investors should always check the facts behind any statement here. Please note that the Company has made it very clear that information on social media can be inadvertently or even deliberately misleading”

I agree Pareto, however not sure if you’re referring to Keith Oz or foot and mouth but could be either .

Your professional opinion means a lot.

BTW , Have you found your dummy again ? You’re not a Nursie of your word at all are you.!

Reported.

Potential investors should always check the facts behind any statement here. Please note that the Company has made it very clear that information on social media can be inadvertently or even deliberately misleading, and urged investors to rely only on statements in an RNS and the Company's official X account.”

Keith Oz opinion is certainly not fact or correct , there is NO 100% GCOS for Guercif mentioned anywhere.

An absolutely outrageous statement from someone who has not called one thing correct regarding Guercif in near 6 years.

Anyone got a time estimation from a well producing 30-40 bbls day , how long it would take to recover all drilling costs ?

Also is it costs after royalties and taxes or before.

We could be talking years before we are entitled to anything !

So what you are saying is ..

Is a successful oil well and a a few work overs with potential of circa 300- 400 bbls a day total net to us be worth £150 mm in market cap.

Ehhhh.. No !

To those reading old slow posts.

“Please note that the Company has made it very clear that information on social media can be inadvertently or even deliberately misleading”

“Potential investors should always check the facts behind any statement here. Please note that the Company has made it very clear that information on social media can be inadvertently or even deliberately misleading, and urged investors to rely only on statements in an RNS and the Company's official X account.”

Will you confirm this same statement refers to everything that you, and others post, ( anyone basically ) just for clarity, ie can be “ inadvertently or deliberately misleading “ Whether it be negative, neutral or positive bias.

After all this cannot be one sided can it ?

What you state are certainly not always facts , as you also now state anything you write is your opinion only.

For record could you highlight something re Morocco which you have posted prior that has turned out 100% correct after the time of the statement ?

Many thanks.

Hi Keith,

I at no time named you as the author, however your defence of this report which you publically endorsed many times on here is telling.

Scorpion geo science has 1 employee and as of last filing report has circa £150 k of assets, fixed and tangible.

So you have by admission stated that your expectation is that this new Knock out ITR will be published by them and used as the basis for Full OHYNM admission / sanction / corroboration that Guercif is fully proven commercial and all statements made here by you are indeed correct ?

IMO, You also state that both OHYNM geo team and Scorpion should be fully aligned in agreement in all statements in the eagerly awaited ITR ( which you stated was coming a month ago ) which will lead to certain announcement of full commercial status for the field ?

I have no call or cause to apologise to you.

The statements below are 1 persons view only. This person has not called anything correct in 6 years re Morocco.

Morning Pareto,

Hope you’re having a great weekend.

No need, if you dispute any of it , you show where the outcomes you are championing , have borne factually 100% correct previously in the industry with the facts as they are right now. You are calling and championing huge outcomes as a given.

I’m not getting into your games.

Is it your expectation Scorpion Geo science will be issuing this new ITR ?

“A request with agreed terms for an Amendment No.5 to extend the First Extension Period of the Guercif Petroleum Agreement from 5 March 2026 to 5 November 2026 has been submitted.”

Official wording - RNS.

This is not the same as Keith Oz Statement where he implies clear outcomes.

Also clear to me now who the author was for the famous fake research note a year or so ago.

Morning all,

Proven Commerciality is not a Paul Griffith statement to make by himself , that will only come with full approval and sanction from OHYNM, To remind you all , , not 1 cubic inch of gas has flowed from 5 drilled wells. OHYNM have never sanctioned or been involved in statements that do not have 100% independent proof and validation and that will require more than an ITR.

Never in the history of oil and gas has a commercial discovery been announced and corroborated with statements endorsed by the sovereign nation on this basis , and then detailing FDP, sales agreements etc. if it has, could someone please highlight this.

Also this much lauded ITR, I hope this is not coming from the very much connected one man band Scorpion Geo Science, ?

Is this the expectation ?

Also let us focus on the main thing right now and that is come March 5th, unless OHYNM award us the extension ( which we have not fulfilled the required terms on the licence ) all this is tatties over the side !

4 weeks left until the Guercif Licence inflection point.

Discuss please without insults.

Sick Nursie Mick Trick has been swatting up his AI interactions.

Quiet day for the bed baths on all male ward 11.

Sick mick milf, what a load of complete and utter guff !

What we reckon guys,RNS or not.?

Have a great weekend all.

Aw Sick Mick… another one of your abusive multi nics…🤣🤡

*On Completion of the MOU-5 well it was intended to use the discretionary well to extend the First Extension Period to 5 November 2026 and to re-negotiate the remaining 3D seismic commitment

*A request with agreed terms for an Amendment No.5 to extend the First Extension Period of the Guercif Petroleum Agreement from 5 March 2026 to 5 November 2026 has been submitted.”

Worrying ! What if OHYNM do not accept this and insist we have breached by not doing the required 3 D seismic ?

What will happen in March if this is the case ?