Member Info for tintin35

Since S, L, V and, of course, MP reserved against the proposal, it should mean that they lose the vote and that the proposal benefits the new mining establishment.
The voice figures should be 185 for and 162 against.

find out at 4pm?

from avanza (hence google b*llocks)
Cut with yesterday's parliamentary debate https://www.riksdagen.se/en/webb-tv/video/betankande/mineralpolitik_H601NU11
As well as minutes written down with what the politicians who reserved item no. 1 (the one about quickly introducing new legislation to simplify and shorten granting process.

No one has said no to the bill, mp does it and v probably does that too. m, kd and sd have already said yes, obviously. c and l press yes is quite obvious from what they said. Again they just read literally what they said in the protocols on the link. s is a little tricky but has little influence in this position since m, sd, kd, c and l still approve. s did not seem clear to any decision for strategic reasons, they say yes to paragraph 1, no matter what they press and they are voting for approval. It would show that s listened to the people who want more job opportunities. Then support the infrastructure for the EU (increased exports), green mining and more tax revenues. That is why one can reserve their voice as some parties did yesterday. If item 1, which the Riksdag puts behind, approves, we have new teams faster than quick and it will show up in Beowulf's course. So buying today before decision making is my advice. It was also on report yesterday, so there will probably be many eyes that are looking for mining companies to invest in, today.

"We are naturally delighted that all three of the deep wells drilled on the Airshagyl structure have demonstrated the existence of oil-bearing intervals at a common depth, which we believe may extend over the full 58 km2 size of the Airshagyl structure.



Three producing deep wells on the Airshagyl structure would make a compelling commercial case to seek to move this structure onto an international based licence with the majority of oil produced from the Airshagyl structure then being sold by reference to worlds rather than domestic prices.

Finally! Some great news!
This find, together with the finds at Deep Wells A5 and A6, marks the third of the three deep wells drilled on the Airsghagyl structure to have shown the presence of oil. The Company believes the structure may extend across the full 58 km2 of the Airshagyl structure



The second reservoir target is of Devonian age anticipated at a depth of approximately 5,200 meters.

I agree that it doesn't technically affect our application - but a consensus from Parliament that something has gone wrong and needs sorting could be the kick up the ar*se the Minister needs. He may have been waiting for this before deciding whether he had the political backing to issue the licence (and all the others that have backed up)
A confirmation tomorrow will have a decent uppy effect on the SP I reckon.

This is the proposal;
The permit process for the mining and mineral industry should be simplified (NU11)
Today, the permit processes for Swedish mining are long and complicated and also spread across several authorities. This may mean that important investments will not be made. The permit processes should therefore be simplified and shortened to strengthen the Swedish mining and mineral industry. The Committee on Industry, Public Health and Consumer Policy believes that the Riksdag should address a call, a so-called announcement, to the Government to come back with concrete proposals for this. In particular, the committee emphasizes the possibility of giving an authority, such as Sweden's geological survey (SGU), the overall responsibility for the entire permit process.

The proposals for the announcement can be found in motions from M and SD from the general exercise period 2018. The Committee on Enterprise and Industry proposes that the Riksdag say no to other motions for motion.

Committee's proposal for a decision: Applauds two motion certificates on simpler and shorter permit processes for the mining and mineral industry. Rejection of other exercise certificates.
comments;
The committee's proposal: The Riksdag supports the committee's statement that the government should take the necessary measures to simplify and shorten the permit processes for the mining and mineral industry and announce this to the government.
Thus, the Riksdag approves the motions

2018/19: 157 by Eric Palmqvist and others. (SD) claims 4 and

2018/19: 2783 by Lars Hjälmered et al. (M) claim 33 and

reject motion

2018/19/1987 by Per-Arne Håkansson et al. (S).
I have no idea what the means

decision tomorrow I think - odd - Swedes are normally so quick about doing things

If I was the Minister in charge of making decisions about mining and the Government debated and decided I was crap at doing it and something had to be done - I'd be a tad embarrassed and maybe get round to doing my job to get them off my back?

Just a vain hope.

PS - Barber's adagio has to be the Beowulf theme....

oddly, all the just links worked for me......

I just cut and paste me - worth checking out avenza - it's where the real Swedish nutters live;
https://www.avanza.se/placera/forum/forum/beowulf-mining.html

anyway - 0.92 sek - gradually creeping up.....

(thanks google translate)
Here are some motions that are raised in the government chamber on Tuesday, May 7,
1. (m) introduction of Royalties for Regions in mining operations
http://riksdagen.se/en/dokument-lagar/dokument/motion/landsbygden-and-inforande- av-royalties-for_H6021732
2. (m) Clearer legislation so that exploration companies get full right to deposits processing concession, not state.
http://riksdagen.se/en/dokument-lagar/dokument/motion/starkt-aganderatt-i-minerallagen_H6021262
3. (c) introduce an investigator to avoid lengthy procedures.
http://riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/motion/tillkallande-av-sarskild-utredare-for_H6022219
4. (m) points 14, 15 & 16 Reward and simplify for mining companies with low deposit and effective consession. Open target for Kallak north with ore near the ground surface and high iron content
http://riksdagen.se/en/dokument-lagar/dokument/motion/sverige-som-et-resourceffektivt-samhalle_H6022891
5. (kd) increase local environmental policy (the majority in Jokkmokk is for Kallak)
http://riksdagen.se/en/dokument-lagar/arende/betankande/mineralpolitik_H601NU11
6. (sd) all 8 points are balm for the soul
http://riksdagen.se/en/dokument-lagar/ document / motion / mineral policy-for-a-stark-gruvnaring_H602157

S are so diplomatic that I do not intend to deal with their statements. Mp gets someone else write about, thank you o law they have little influence.

Everything taken fromhttp://riksdagen.se/en/dokument-lagar/arende/betankande/mineralpolitik_H601NU11
On Thursday morning 9 May when everything is clapped and clear, it will be off.

open in chrome - it will auto translate. Basically Gov't decisions - not specifically on kallak but could make any licence a heck of a lot easier - and could support SP boost (which is all we care about)

not a bank holiday tomorrow for swedes - can't believe there is a day when they work and we don't......

" at lkab's general meeting last week, Jan Moström, CEO and CEO, demanded legally and effective administrative for mining in Sweden. He was very critical of the state of things.

" we have become a kickball between different government authorities. We can't have it so if Sweden is to remain a leading industry and gruvnation ", thundered moström from the rostrum.

Göran Färm, chairman of Beowulf mining and former Meps (s), testifies to how it can be done.

Beowulf submitted his first application for bearbetningskoncession for the kallak project in blood, which is designated as the largest unprocessed järnmalmsfyndigheten in Europe, in April 2013.

So the company has waited more than six years on final notice!

It's no wonder Sweden is starting to lose in international rankingar over attractive gruvnationer."

we shoudn't forget that every move up is immediately held back by the sale of the two placement shares. It's annoying but they will be gone soon...

regarding impartiality of CAB;
The fact that the County Administrative Board has received severe criticism from many quarters regarding the handling of the Kallak case is fully understandable. Two years ago, two professors from Luleå University of Technology went out and questioned the County Administrative Board's authority and competence regarding the Kallak and Laver case. It has even been speculated that there are mining opponents within the County Administrative Board Norrbotten. The article clearly states that there has been an officer in the county administrative board who is active in several organizations that work against mining operations. If the person remains, few were unaware. But in my and the professors' eyes, this is called devastation! You can read the article below:

There is no doubt that there is a great value in Kallak which is Europe's largest mapped and unprocessed iron ore deposit. At the same time as the demand for iron ore increases and LKAB's ore begins to run out earlier than expected. A big trigger is approaching and I have drawn my conclusion to where it will land. Should be good upside down just for coming decisions and at a YES we will see completely different courses than where we are today. The share costs approximately SEK 0.91 and is traded under the short name BEO SDB at Spotlight Stock Market.

This is on agenda for next week;
The permit process - one stop shop
The junior companies are more dependent on venture capital and sensitive to uncertainties until the start of mining than the larger companies that have a different endurance through their cash flow from existing mines in operation. According to the report How can the state promote investments in the extraction of innovation-critical metals and minerals from the Growth Analysis that junior companies prefer to see an early rejection of the permit process for a potential mine ,so that capital can work further elsewhere. Some companies also mean that the licensing process is arbitrary and that it is not possible to predict or influence the result regardless of how much documentation they produce. In the long run, this risks eroding Sweden's attractiveness in the global mining market. Therefore, we propose that the government introduce a so-called one stop shop, which means that an authority is tasked with coordinating the permit process and is the only party that places questions to licensing mining companies. Furthermore, we propose that the government be tasked with reviewing the permit process for new mines and returning to the Riksdag with proposals for improvements to the same.

lol - not much happening over there - they seem to have at least Easter holidays;

•Good Friday. Friday 19 April.
•Orthodox Good Friday. Friday 26 April.
•Orthodox Easter Monday. Monday 29 April.
•Labour day. Wednesday 1 May

0.95 sek now - equals 7.5p - some bargains out there.....

currently 0.92 over there - all looking good with big buys....