RE: Gostoso29 Jul 2018 14:23
Colbalt.
Not sure I am qualified enough to respond as well as others might, but will do my best.
Not sure how the presiding is a factor. PXS are a company of 2 heads that were 3, just maintaining the IP and documentation. The company have never been in a position to take FF forward as a product, it would have cost millions upon millions. Hence the arrival of DSM who have the plant and resources. Be thankful PXS still have the IP, without it PXS would have gone 5 years ago or more.
The end user is with DSM, they have the marketing resources.
The remuneration packages have no bearing on the SP IMO.
Deadlines are up to DSM nowadays, perhaps PXS should have been more circumspect here.
Lack of vision and enthusiasm. Well don’t understand that comment at all.
Final observations from me, is, that loads of investors realise the potential here but many of us thought it would happen way back when. The reason we hang on is the potential. I was persuaded all those years ago by asshur and his enthusiasm when I was an infant investor.
Remember you can sell and invest somewhere else anytime, your decision. You could get some money back elsewhere. VRS?