RE: Facts not wish list.16 Apr 2019 11:40
Cyrox the judgement said this
I saw no inconsistency between my robustly finding that the Plaintiffs’ substantive breach of fiduciary claim had no realistic prospects of success, on the one hand, and on the other hand accepting that the Plaintiffs’ core appellate complaint that it was not properly open to me to reach that conclusion at the interlocutory stage, had realistic prospects of success before the Court of Appeal.”
the judge appears to be letting it run to the court of appeal as he thinks Frontera may have cause to appeal his ruling (and to not let it run to the court of appeal would negate their appeal ability)
*** I found that posted by eyesonhawk, added to archive by MadPunter **********