RE: Spread26 May 2021 13:37
Hi Lucky!
SLP reprocess the tailings and run of mine chrome ore of chrome miner (and ferrochrome producer) Samancor - after Samancor have had the first pass at extracting the chrome from the ore themselves.
SLP actually have an amazing deal with Samancor (thanks, Terry!). SLP reprocess what Samancor clearly believed was a low value waste product, and extract both PGMs and yet more chrome from it. The chrome they give back to Samancor for free, as a kind of payment. The PGMs they keep for themselves.
My guess is that Samancor, when they signed up to the deal almost ten years ago, had no idea how valuable the PGMs that SLP extract and sell would prove to be. IMO, it's been a costly mistake for them.
SLP run a very low cost operation as they have no mining costs.
This all comes with some risks and caveats, of course. SLP have a finite life of mine - currently I'd estimate it at 8-10 years. They are also dependent on Samancor, which is an obscure private company with controversial owners. The basic deal between SLP and Samancor has been stable for years, but there is risk in it. And, finally, it's not clear how SLP are going to develop and expand their business in the future.
In contrast:
Tharisa are much bigger thanSLP - they produce a lot more ounces of PGMs and a great deal of chrome as well. They have higher costs, as they must actually mine the PGM/chrome bearing ore from their open pits. They have a much longer life of mine. They are not dependent on any business partner in the way that SLP are dependent on Samancor. They have much clearer growth opportunities, and they are investing to improve the current business (i.e. building the Vulcan plant now).
IMO, both are excellent companies and definite "buys". But I'd rate Tharisa higher than SLP, because it is simply a more stable business with a clearer growth path.