Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
46G. I’m I correct in saying that the confirmatory testing is only a question of tweaking the chemicals a bit to get optimal performance, and not to see if it works? Would we be this far if there was any doubt ?
So will I be very wealthy, compared to my present lowly status, of course.
Perhaps the electricity Bill was unlit?
« And put previous failures to bed »
The word failures does imply, at least in part, as the fault of QFI, which it was not. The word ‘misfortune ‘ is preferable, I think. Also, the market can be completely irrational, and I can quote several instances, to my cost.
I cannot imagine that they have gone this far and haven’t already held a sample up to the light and laid their bets. For me, it’s only a question of getting the chemicals correct.
Colin, when the government want and need your money, as they surely will, will your ISA save your cash? Do stay hopeful, though.
elir, re bugs in diesel, I have had a 27hp Yanmar for 35 years installed in a well used boat. I’ve changed the filter once, ( because one should, I was told), and have had no trouble. The boat spent two years in the tropics, otherwise in English temperatures.
I’ve kept the tank topped up after a passage. But more important, perhaps, is that I’ve always filtered the diesel before putting it into the tank. So could it be dirt that helps to initiate bug growth, or am I blessed?
Élir Is this a diesel on a boat you own?
Have we been told and I’ve missed it, but do we know the cost of the fuel per HP produced compared to diesel?
wongaFC. You cruel, cruel, man. What pleasure have you derived from your post? But let us pray together that things return to where they were.
Please, would somebody, Indigo or Fyoz perhaps, step in and adjudicate in the argument between SeisNav and myself? To wit, that if your share value goes down, your wealth goes down with it, regardless of any pretence otherwise. Or not.
“a company with huge potential but also huge risk too”
Present price about 3.3p. Maximum loss therefore is 3.3p a share. Maximum gain could be plenty, plenty and more. The two huge’s are nowhere near the same.
“You don’t lose anything until you sell”. My wife says that if a share goes up tuppence in the morning, and down a penny in the afternoon, you have gained a penny. I say that you’re lost a penny. I’m right, am I not?
Iantobach, What does 200k sterling look like. Hope to be shown soon.
Salinger, I would be quite surprised if Greenfields did not have a number of customers “more or less” line up and ready to do their duty. I agree with you that we have other exciting prospects, and are not dependent on Utah.
Yes, Nouryon is a chemical company and is on our side, they may find a substitute for glycerine, don’t you think.
Salinger, yes, you are correct in a sort of legal definition, but if Utah fails for some arcane reason, watch our share price fall. That’s a stake, then, in my book.
Yes we jolly well do have a stake in the Utah project.
I’m not really sure about the necessity, or rather the desirability, for QFI to issue RNSs for each step taken in the advancement of our Utah project. What’s the point if it’s a small delay or advancement? Am I alone in this opinion?