Member Info for thomasbrowne

Zwartkops you bought at 94+pence and sold at sub 7p ==== GET OVER IT ==== LOL LOL you really are funny zwartkops, Everyone knew you would jump in here today when you got out of that straight jacket, and when Fum had a bout of only profit taking. Relax chill out and take it all in your stride, come back when we hit over a £1++++ LOL

GLA

It’s genuinely nothing to worry about, it’s just Simón Thompson advising us that he says to take some profits on Fum , though he says he might regret it, it just a general take profits on his best tips, nothing whatsoever about fums very high potential and opportunity ,
I’m 100% certain he will again tip us as a strong buy when our 3rd trial has ended. It’s just a knee jerk reaction to his take some profits, and lock in that profit. But it’s a fantastic opportunity to get in at such a very low level,
Watch and see the buying once this profit taking ends, it might take several days until investors understand that this is a serious over sold situation, and Simon Thompson is still 100% behind fums potential, we’ve been here before and we will come back stronger and higher.

GLA

Simon Thompson is only covering himself in case of any market falls , and he can claim he told investors to to take some profits at exactly this point in time, and when fum eventually soars he can also claim that also, I can understand his thinking/ covering himself. Hedging his bets .
Yes there's going to be selling profit taking ok , but I'm confident buyers will seize this opportunity to buy substantially after this bout of profit taking ends.
Ans probably by these exact same sellers LOL.

Good luck all

Vital progenix ! Just look this product up on eBay and just look at all the similar products that are sold along side this type of concoction. LOL, they get launched quite frequently , and quite a lot are old concoctions , revamped And renamed to catch another load of vulnerable people out.
No urologist would point anyone in the direction of a untested ED concoction, only a properly tested drug getting through all the stringent difficult 1st 2nd and 3rd trials could be prescribed by any respectable urologist, And that's our initial target market. "Prescription" There will always be ED untested concoctions floating about , year in year out. That never changes. But only rarely does something like viagra hit the market, and now in it's probably ? gel form, in our med gel, so that's why our med gel is unrivalled in this market, it's actually desperately needed by people who can't medically take viagra type pills.

I'm personally more interested to see this brexit fiasco resolved ASP.
Good luck all.

Rhodi I record and watch every Dragons den episode that's been made, and I've no recollection of seeing anything around any ED pill, LOL, even if there was it would take probably around 7 + years to bring it to market, so I'm wondering what your
Claiming !.
If there was anything worth noting around any new pills, believe me it would all over our newspapers.
There's all sorts of dangerous untested rubbish out there , with no clinical testing or backups.

Our MED GEL is the only new ED product to hit the market in 20 years. Anything else is a red herring . And remember our MED GEL is firstly directed towards people who can't use viagra type pills, and that's a he'll of a lot of people to cater for.

Good luck all.

All those big buys/ great to see, Though I’m starting to think that our 3rd trial results, or parts of them are leaking out somewhere? And there’re “GOOD/ excellent ? Funny how these things leak out before we’re officially told, it’s nearly always the way, LOL
GLA

Zwartkops when you come down from whatever high your on, read all your post again, and ponder ?! who really is deranged here,LOL PMSL, LOL
If nothing else, you’re a really funny disillusioned investor, LOL Go back to sleep now, LOL
Good Luck All

Reflex thank you kindly for that kind endorsement.

Believe me there are other so called de -dampers on here, if I pointed out some serious concerns about futura medicals past and current trading history, they would pounce on it and roll it into there own de-ramping post, and throw it up as many times as possible,
Believe me , I and many others have plenty of negative things to say about futura medicals trading history. And all of it is absolutely true.

It's hard for me to give a perfectly balanced view, when many others are giving unbalanced negative views, I'm unbalanced in a positive way , because of this permanent situation,

I could easily point out fums past failures , and large amounts of money essentially wasted, it's not that fum have developed a bad or unusable product, it's getting a established major pharmaceutical company to spend the huge amounts of money needed to gain any traction with any one product, the CSD condom is a perfect example, if Pfizer had of taken it , then it would be the viagra condom , and a incredible success story. People need a trusted household name to even try some products, that CSD condom was a excellent ED and fun product to sell, but you have to keep spending millions until it gains market share, and that's were we failed, and not with the condom itself. I've seen and heard eminent business people say the same Exact words, if you don't continuously promote your product, it's no chance of establishing itself .

I've all sorts of concerns around futura medical, but that won't help the company get this excellent MED GEL to market, only hinder it. You will find when investors sell there shares , they can frequently let all there pent up negative thoughts out about that company , the higher amounts of shares held , normally causes that person to avoid any negative comments about the company, and the lower amounts held , causes these negative , hopefully truths to come out,
And the remaining share holders may then see that non holder and outside investor as a unspoken possible enemy,
Trying to de-ramp the share to get in again at a cheaper price, and any comments coming from that outside investor is scrutinized for negative connotations, if I write negative things about that company , then these people, as I've said before can use my negative words against me and the company in there own post.
So maybe you can understand a little more about my positive post, as everyone keeps saying , s
Do your own research, and take every negative and positive post with a pinch of salt.

Good luck all

Thomas Cook! Exactly, several years ago my own brother thought I should buy those shares at 14p, he knew Harriet green the CEO of Thomas Cook personally , I think that’s her name? He said Thomas she doesn’t go into anything if she doesn’t think she can turn it around!!
I said you maybe right, but the risk were so high with 1 billion worth of debts!!! The shares steadily went from 14p to £1.75p , I was dismayed about it, or ****ed off to be accurate,LOL
But not now, a company worth billions and then worth nothing at all, I’ve seen far to many big billion pound companies bite the dust.

Timing is everything, you could have made a million on Fum with the right timing, or just sit tight and believe Fum will deliver on our med gel, if that happens, investors should make very serious money, Simon Thompsons happy with liberums sky high price of £1.37p , that is after a good 3rd trial result, and that looks safe enough in my estimation. It also could be very conservative?.

If we get a good licensing partner / partners,our shares will fly, how high is anyone’s guess .
For me the only real justifiable risk is how many users will like, love and use our med gel, that’s a unknown question and answer, that nobody can genuinely answer until it hits the open market.
It will be a seller ok, but can it be a blockbuster of a product. Either way we are onto a winner at these prices, today’s price factors in a decent seller, but not a worldwide great seller, if we get the right partner to push this around the world, I’m very confident we will have a great selling product, and much more than a doubling of today’s share price.

GLA

Reflex plenty of significant investors buy shares after doing their research and including reading post on this and other forums, plenty of PI have spent well above £100,000 in fum, NOW that’s significant investors ,,, ? I know of several myself,

Though I’m sure nobody buys large amounts of fums shares on my say so,,LOL,

Reflex I reiterate, nobody should buy any shares on my say so, EVER,
Reflex you ask me why I post so much, it’s mostly to answer people like you, if you didn’t post and put all these questions to me I wouldn’t be here right now, I would be out flying my kite,,LOL

GOOD LUCK ALL

Reflex that’s why there’s forums like this, so everyone can have there say , rampers and de-rampers, and people that don’t even know they are doing both, LOL
sometimes people post maybe silly stuff, and within that sill stuff good important information about a company can be revealed to other investors,
And sometimes de-rampers in their normally / anger post ,can reveal unpleasant truths about a company, and help balance up the truth around a companies history and fortunes,
It’s all swings and roundabouts.
Reflex just because you know about futura medical, doesn’t mean others know it all, IE new investor Guster yesterday, he seemed to need basic information about a RNS , that’s why I quite often sound like a broken record ,,LOL LOL
IM never going to stop banging the drumbeat for futura medical, In case a new investor comes along , and wants to know if we’re worth buying.

I assume you want others to buy the share you hold, and you hope to make a fortune with?

Good luck all

It’s widely believed Fum or essentially our med gel will be snapped up by another major pharmaceutical company, I’m not to sure if saying that adds up to ramping up a share, LOL I guess people see things in different lights! ?

Some people state the worst aspects of a company, they may or not be de-ramping, And sometimes people highlight a companies strengths, that may not be ramping a share up, It depends were your coming from, Trying to. Drive a SP down by playing on people’s fears with de-ramping , and causing sells, that’s easily done/ to increase fear , with already fearful investors.
It’s perfectly acceptable to highlight a companies products and potential, as long as it’s accurate and true. Sometimes these lines get blared!!! and in there lies the conflicts in our forums!?
GLA

That sounds a lot better, LOL it’s a start, LOL
anything can happen in the share buying world, up and to Fum being valued at many hundreds of millions of pounds. Our med gel is very valuable, but nobody knows how valuable?
GLA

zwartkopts Talk about.... calling the kettle black.

here's just a small sample of 5 of your own post below. taken from your own history.

zwartkops = 50p Will be way back in the horizon come the 14th......We will be back to to at least the 96p we had back in Sept 2016

Zwartkopts = This is one of the safest shares on the market with probably the biggest potential to be a global player with high revenue and low outlay.

Zwartkops = What's more the SP has the capacity to produce multibagging spikes along its journey.....
This coming 2 weeks will prove just that

Zwartkopts = im anticipating 50p before cob this Friday.
Too risky to try and get in after Friday then who knows? SP has hit 90p plus on good news before.
Should a TO happen we must be looking at £2.50 upwards

Zwartkopts = My bugs....This will scream up to 60 70p in a couple of hours anytime before the 14th....

Off course Zwartkopts you weren't trying to persuade anyone to buy any shares in fum...LOL LOL

enjoy zwartkopts, just a we sample you posted, there's plenty more were they came from, and all in your own writing, Hypocrite or what LOL. I'V a very busy day today, So put this in your pipe and smoke it, LOL
KIND Regards Tommy LOL LOL

Bandet1 I appreciate your kind words and endorsement , I also appreciate yours very much,

It’s great to get a insight into other investors minds, good and bad, though not to bad. LOL,
Everyone’s loyal, but only up to a point, and that normal equates to the amount of profit or losses anyone makes, even our BOD would leave with the right offer.LOL,

As long as you expect anything to happen here, then you own the right share.

What I don’t want to happen to Fum , is to part with our med gel to cheaply, as it’s potentially a blockbuster of a product . But more especially it’s essentially needed by urologist to prescribe to ED patients . Never mind the OTC market, which could be truly massive.

If we do well in the prescription market, then our share price should in advance price in the OTC market. And by several years.
GLA

BruceJamieson There’s nothing illegal About anything Lombards done, it’s just a underhanded way of increasing your shareholding for less money, and taking advantage of a company needing urgent funding, their shape-shooting investment advisors have told them to do it, and it’s perfectly legal, just not very commendable. That’s life for you,

James Barder stated way before csd, that our med Gel was the most valuable product we had, but the cost to bring it to market was prohibitive, and that was around the time of the great financial-meltdown, and recession , few people could raise any funds for anything, including the banks, speak to Noel Edmonds about that one, or google it .

We are probably curtailed at the moment from the history of futura medical, but this med gel looks completely different from anything before it, there’s several silly concoctions out there selling loads at the moment, and our med gel can easily take there market share away from them very easily, we beat them in every area of testing, application, usability, likability, to be genuinely honest, these other products are horrendous, and they are selling, because there is a need for them out there, and that’s we’re we come in , with all guns blazing,

I think I’m getting carried away here,LoL, but you get the picture . We can take this market easily, the urologist will give our med gel the big thumbs up, they’ve effectively already done that from our 2trials results. And our 3rd trial results should increase the amount of urologist thumbs going up.

If a big multinational pharmaceutical company takes a bet on us , taking us out at a few hundred million, they could very well clean up here after a few years, and especially hitting the OTC market with our med gel, the little handy med gel for all occasions, who wouldn’t want there loved one to put it on them. And that translates into some serious money. But who has the foresight to get in early? Pfizer, ? Any of the big condom makers ? Or the opportunistic Chinese , and hopefully backed by there unscrupulous very rich government ,

right now nobody knows how big this could be, nobody, and that’s what makes this a unbelievably speculative investment proposition. at worst it’s going to do really well , and at best it could make today’s share holders seriously rich. That’s how good a proposition we have sitting in front of us all today.

Good Luck All .

BruceJamieson read warrennibbles post again, further down ,
If we sell loads of shares they go down, if Lombard sell loads of shares they go down, and spooking small investors into selling some or all their holding, throw in urgent funding needs, and its a recipe for a very low SP, and Lombard picking up shares on the cheap. No one can legally accuse them of it, And do anything about it, as it’s somehow a acceptable funding practice in this day and age. And We’re also helpless. Fum don’t really care how they get the money, as long as they get it and pay there own wages and trial cost , that’s the bottom line on it. No money, no company,.
It’s deplorable, but what can you do, virtually nothing, ,LOL /not .
GLA

The last fund raising, ! We didn't know exactly what Lombard were up too, but isn't hindsight a wonderful thing,
To put it into perspective, if it happened again , private investors would remortgage their homes and buy fum shares at below 6p. And sell at anything up to 49p.
If Lombard decided to do the same again , there's very little we could do. Though I doubt they would attempt that exact same stunt again/ price wise.
If fum could even hint at the size of the companies in licencing negotiations with us , then it might give us a clue to the potential size and type of money and potential we are talking about. Lombard shouldn't be allowed to drive our SP downwards because they want the biggest amount of shares for there money and backing. They've already done that to us.

Our BOD need to give more presentations to potential investors, I know this is difficult before our 3rd trials results , but they should at least counteract lombards deplorable tactics.

On the release of our 3rd trial results in December, we should get substantial main media writups, and I'm confident all very positive . And I would expect the world's media will also carry our results all around the world, I'm hoping some Chinese ED company will snap us up, in licencing or straight buyout, and backed by the Chinese government in whatever form they want,
there money is as good as anyone's, it's only a ED GEL we are talking about , not a nuclear power station,LOL

GOOD LUCK ALL.

It's important to remember that our 3rd trial results have been shared along the way with several big multinational pharmaceutical companies , if they like what they see, then I'm confident they will pay substantial upfront payments,
There's no reason so far to doubt a good 3rd trial result in December, as far as I'm concerned it's a done deal, and we're just waiting to find out who gets our license .And how much of a upfront payment we're getting.

Lombards big share sales will continue to artificially suppress our SP, we've seen that before/ no thanks.
I just wish they could completely help us to keep the confidence in other share holders, by a more proactive funding policy and helping uk industry get there products to market. If China can do it , why not us.

Good luck all.

It looks like we can see another Lombard RNS share reduction soon , going by those biggish sells,

No problem, I feel we will get a licensing upfront payment and a strategic purchase of our shares by our licensing partners, to raise the funds from them , Lombard and probably us, /small PI,

To me it’s Lombard who’s the problem and the partial paymaster, not ideal, though we will get this sorted soon enough.

I’m very optimistic short term, and hugely confident in our med gels efficacy and the potential of getting a worldwide blockbuster of a product in the long term.

This really could happen, why ?
Because 80% of our 3rd trials participants wanted more of our med gels erectile enhancing effects, that’s my personal barometer to our med gels future efficacy and likability.

Having confidence isn’t really a issue for me, the 2nd trial essentially has proved nearly everything that’s required for a great product, the 3rd trial is for me just a confirmatory mostly likely efficacy enhancing result.
I believe most PI are convinced ok, it’s just Lombard need to play there part in building confidence, by putting out a statement, of them being fully behind our companies ambitions to raise funds and getting our unique product to market. That would go a long way to encourage other investors not be concerned about our companies funding. After all they own most of the company. And have a responsibility to others, and including there own investors,
I know they have their own hidden agendas, but a statement from them around funding would help enormously.

There is no justifiable reason why it can’t be Pfizer at our negotiating table.

GLA