Strongarm Ashley25 Oct 2024 08:36
Three things are mentioned in BoD response today:
"Frasers' wish for Mike Ashley to be appointed as a Director and Chief Executive Officer was first communicated by Frasers to boohoo at an in-person meeting on the evening of Friday 18 October 2024, when Frasers sought to establish a 48-hour deadline for the Board to confirm that it would proceed to make this appointment."
48 hours - over a weekend - to make a potentially huge mistake in terms of the direction of the business? Ashley surely knew that the answer would be no at that timescale.
"Whilst the Board remains willing to discuss Board representation with Frasers in a constructive manner, it has been clear with Frasers that before any appointment can be made, appropriate governance will be required to protect the Company's commercial position and the interests of other shareholders. boohoo has sought assurances from Frasers in this regard and they have not to date been provided."
Again, the BoD will protect their interests and wanted certain assurances - as we all do - and did not get them. Quite clear there is no hard refusal for Frasers to take a seat on the board, but work to be done by both sides.
"The Company's approach to its recent debt refinancing was discussed on numerous occasions with Frasers and its advisers. As part of those discussions Frasers were advised that the Board would be pleased to consider any alternative proposals they might wish to present, but none were forthcoming."
Again, we were led to believe Ashley had answers to the RCF that were commercially better than what the board have taken, but if Ashley was so keen to assist, then where were these offers?
To mention the release of interims would be bizarre if all they do is back up Mike's claims, so maybe the board know they are less concerned and Mike was strong arming his way in before the results to gain an advantage. All in all, he said she said.