We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
We're still only valued at seven years inane ramblings from a sports presenter with FKNG big ears and FKNG little in between them.
Yes Zan, an example that highlights your point is eua. After about twenty years of dilution it was languishing at 0.25 but then went up 160x, which only goes to show that the potential price projections of Ginger & Pretty are not impossible.
Yes magmanus 49, they certainly don't want to talk about someone who knows more than they do, holding such a significant amount.
He has had several opportunities to reduce since the vote.
Why does no one ever want to answer my question about Chris Heminway and his holding in INSP.
I asked the same question a few months ago.
Do they have an agenda ?
Does Chris Heminway still hold over 6% ?
Do all these new poster's know more than him ?
I have to say, I do agree with Bowlers, it does seem strange timing to be boasting about being out now when so many things point to this being a bit of a bargain, considering all the finger's in various interesting pies.
Absolutely right SR.
Do you think that there is any chance that they could find a few big stones that could transform things despite their useless money burning management.
To be in a position to be mining high quality diamonds at a time of rising prices, but still managing to raise money at such ridiculous discounts, then managing to burn through it so quickly is pathetic
Yes definitely a winker.
Seizing assets from the little boy's might be an easy option but the fact that Glen are the majority holder might help in that respect.
You would think that Glencore wouldn't want to risk the license being revoked and the government might be wary of sending out the message to big mining companies like Glen, that they are prepared to do such a thing.
Bad for business.
Dark, if your post at 16.25 is reflective of your investment strategy, then I would suggest that your experience of investing may well turn out to be very dark indeed.
To suggest that reducing your investment from 11% to 10.7% is a sign of lack of belief is ludicrous. How many PI's can you name across the market, who have a similar commitment can you name?
Just think how many shares Duke could buy in other companies of interest if he wasn't so commited to Blu.
WhiteSuitGuy seems to be pumelling Rock with a feather now.
Surely he must be embarrassed by his own post's by now.
Whilst I have been a holder here for a long time, I have learnt a lot from reading posts from Stevehoops and TheKuhmo1.
The prof could also learn a thing or two from reading their posts.
While I'm a bit disappointed that I chose to add significantly yesterday rather than today, I think a bit of perspective is required. Our resident detractor on twitter condemns our CEO as a " joke" for the placing. Let's compare her work with that of the company that I reduced my holding in to add here. On Thursday, they a diamond miner of diamonds that are ranked in the top ten percent in the world based on price per carat, carried out their own placing which was at a discount of 34.6%. They raised £2.1 m. When you you consider that they are a producer of sought after diamonds at a time when prices are rising and their operation is ramping up, then It highlights how responsible by comparison this placing is. The only thing that keeps me there at all is the realistic possibility of them recovering a sizeable stone worth a big chunk of the market cap alone. It is run with total disregard for pi's. I would far rather have Naheed Memon at the helm than those corrupt plucker's.
Some pertinent points from Nick Slater on twitter regarding the comments from Winnie the Poo ( famous poo )
Personally I'd be more concerned if the critique had been from Winnie the Pooh ( famous bear )
Steamy, you suggested it could be worth billions in the future. If you take the lowest amount of billions ( 2 ) which will equate to around 500 million for us, that puts a value of about 10p a share for our holding in satoshi alone which means you think a higher value than JR's 3-10p is possible in the future. Bear in mind JR didn't put a time frame on it either.
JR isn't suggesting anything more than you were, only two posts ago.
Yes, and regards Uriney's point, the buying was stronger today than the selling and the amount of shares in issue is less relevant than the market cap, which is everything. It makes Blu appear to be good value.
I have to say that the quality of some of the recent posts about Putin and his obvious serious flaws have been very impressive. The counter arguement's that have been put forward are extremely naive and could have been penned by the imbecile himself.
To be fair, that post by Ian is as good as it gets.