Make that 29 in half an hour.
He's just knocked out a dozen posts in 28 minutes on the other board.
If you want to be be bored, read them.
If it's lots of posts that you like to see, perhaps you could try advfn. Trouble is the most incessant poster there is an absolute moron.
Taking advice from the likes of him would be like asking a rabbit for advice on how to cross the road safely.
Hit the nail on the head there Azz.
You and some others have made this the best informed BB around. If some of the recent detractors had realized this they may not have wasted their time.
Please join me in a one second silence to remember 2hott.
Let us reflect on his time with us so we can recall his highlights, such as the time that a small part of one of his post's was a bit less rubbish than the rest.
According to investingofthing, savvy institutional investor's only buy near NAV.
Only a fellow Clown would take that Clowns advice.
EUA raised at 26.50, about a week ago. NAV - 0.19.
Why do you think TERN can only raise around the stated NAV?
How do you explain how WSBN managed to raise, a few days ago at a premium to the then share price which was about 14 x the NAV. It has since risen considerably
Reigned in.
A couple of poster's are claiming that the share price of tern got so ahead of NAV that it had to be rained in.
I thought I'd compare a few others to see if it confirmed what l, and probably most on this site already knew.
I only checked four company's and the results are as follows-
WSBN - 19p. NAV - 0.94
EUA. - 25.40. NAV - 0.19
SAR. - 2.50. NAV - 0.06
ITM. - 372.80. NAV - 4.76
These company's and their investors realise that it's the exciting potential that counts, and it should be the same with TERN.
In fact TERN is very good value by comparison!
Were you not right about the 30% rhodi? I think it was 100 million shares that he wanted the authority to issue.
They're so good that Elton John sang about them.
No.
Good opportunity to buy at the placing price today, hopefully not for much longer.
Now. Just try to scrutinize your own posts with the same rigour as you do for others and you may find that you're taken more seriously.
Just testing.
You fell for it.
Thought you would!
Perhaps stick to the day job G.Rees.
Obviously not a comedian.
Although- having said that!
While you're being pedantic G.Rees. I would like to point out that I missed a full stop out of my last post, I also should of had a comma between you're and properly.
Maybe about time you admitted to your, much bigger mistakes!
Strange: considering that you're a fool who doesn't know when to stop
Oh look, I just used you're properly!