RE: It was stated in the Andrews 231 Jul 2024 17:22
Wholly agree Itsawrap. Some people seem completely incapable to understand the company are not, in this case, responsible for the state of the share price. It is, as you state, immaterial as to the level of their salaries. In fact, they are not in the higher quartile. All this incessant buIIshlte about dividends, buy-backs and wages has absolutely no bearing on the present company valuation. I see one person on X demanding DB buys shares. What on earth would that achieve? A rise possibly on the day then a retrace. But when of course he sells them, a possible major retrace. The old boy is heading to 74 and whilst from what I can see , his marbles are all in good shape, he will retire sooner probably than later. It;s 'dead money' and potentially damaging for him to buy shares. The value here is all down to progressing the assets, drilling as many wells as possible and strengthening revenues in order to reward shareholders in a rising share price and regular, decent dividends for years to come. Whilst Heid may not like my opinion, I have no desire to get a bigdividend at this stage when that cash could drill another Oklahoma well. My belief is that the board have made the best decision possible in view of the government take on UK fossil fuels and in the nick of time.