RE: Just18 Dec 2025 13:37
Having studied the Author 42 website, I tend to disagree with fellow contributors regarding the product's future viability. It is still in its Beta phase, and writing tools for fiction books are under development for launch in Beta format in early 2026. Prof Nag spends some of his time in academia, and will have assessed the needs of academics when writing their specialised non fiction books. The tools already in place are designed to provide for the academic author's requirements and assist them during the various components of their writing journey. Having worked alongside academic colleagues, who published textbooks, I am aware of how time consuming, and laborious the overall process can be. So many of my former colleagues took 5 - 10 busy years from starting work on their textbooks to finally completing them. Author 42 will enormously simplify the process, and is designed to assist the author throughout the various stages to publication, thereby reducing the stress induced at each step.
I appreciated the Author 42 Zoom meeting feedback posted earlier, and additionally from Clair Lu and Jane Lytel's comments since last September, I gather that they have their work cut out to inform potential authors of textbooks, popular non-fiction texts, as well as fiction in its various genres of, the advantages of using Author 42 as they work through the various stages of writing their book. They obviously need an advertising budget , as their current outreach on LinkedIn and elsewhere is far from sufficient and isn't reaching its intended users.
Author 42 is early stage, and we shall see how it progresses? Most investors here, myself included, are in agreement that future products launched through CapMedical may well have a wider appeal? Prof Nag's recent appearances as a guest speaker have been at conferences focused on medical matters, and he will no doubt be aware of the trends in medicine that will benefit the most from an AI input.
It has been a rough couple of months with this investment. Like so many of you, I am wondering whether Richard Edwards actions may have had anything to do with this? With Prof Nag as executive chair, and a restructured BOD, we can but hope for an improved outlook in the not too distant future? GLA.