Member Info for testpack3

VH you dolt. The OnG is pushing H2 because it knows it is the future. Which you keep posting against. Over 90% of H2 is derived from Methane, via Steam Reforming Natural Gas. Naturally, the NG is from the Oil industry, with Shell accounting for the vast majority of production. It has a large C footprint, the one you know the driving force behind GW, which of course, you are a denier. Shell abandoned it's plans to build H2 refuelling stations in UK, since it finally twigged it was pushing a technology which would be the thin end of the wedge to end high OnG prices. For cars, SSB is the way forward 'til HFC are much less expensive. $Billions is being spent on H2 from Electrolysis, and other non fossil fuel methods. H2 is the future, and not from dirty, carcinogenic, fossil fuels. Tell that to your paymasters VH.

Not a clue. Only suggestion is a 'glitch'.

Swazers. Read my posts, or better still, ask an adult to read and explain them to you. I know what VH is, he is an OnG man and a paid deramper. However, one can never change the mind of a fool, and that's you. GFY

VH. Go and join swazers as being deluded. HFuel cells are the way forward in transport. Not for cars though, for the people on average wages. but in every other form of transport. In the short to medium term, solid state batteries remain the better option for cars. The benefits are obvious, cleaner air to breathe, and making Saudi Arabia impotent in their cartel to control World inflation by inflating oil price. Go on then VH, knock your pay masters, Big Oil. GFY.

Swazers. You are a deluded fool. Do not mention me in the same sentence as VH. I am a H2 supporter, and supporting a H2 breakthrough in transport 10 years ago. I have told VH to GFH many times before. Like you, he has an agenda. He is an OnG man, you want to promote your failing 'chart' business.

There will have to to be an up to date DFS with the time lapse as already highlighted by Ideas and GW62, however, it's immaterial without EISA. As it was succinctly put ' let's consider one bankrupting factor at a time'.

I was looking forward to this company giving me a very healthy bank balance before the grim reaper comes a knocking. It all looked so good at one time. lol. If only I had a quid for all the AIM cos I thought would me make me millions. lol

Still, as one door closes, another is ready to smack you in the face. Thankfully, I have RR. and Shell.

Visitinghost.

Visits over, go home, and please stay there. Fossil fuels destroy, H2 is the future.

It's a communication Jim, but not as we know it.

this caught my attention ' putting in place a new funding agreement with its Strategic Investors, and finalising optimisation work ahead of a Bankable Feasibility Study.'

Good luck with that..

Echo Ideas comments to Momo, re: copy and past highlights. Research reports are 99% garbage, paid for by the company, and written by the company.

Resorted to 'caveman' technology for heat - burning wood. below is he first line of it's mantra,

'EQTEC plc (AIM: EQT), a global technology innovator powering distributed, decarbonised, new energy infrastructure through its waste-to-value solutions for hydrogen, biofuels, and energy generation , etc'

lol Looks to me like pyrolysis.

The 6th July RNS states ' the RIA was unable to approve the application'. It did not say it is beyond our remit. It is a refusal. Graham will try to spin it any way he can, and in essence, treats us SH's like fools, who cannot understand English. I did contact FCA about the 6 July RNS, and was interested in the date of the communication from RIA to EML saying EISA was refused, since when I aked EML directly for the date, the reply said that the information in the RNS was within their legal and obligatory duties. The FCA said it was happy with what SH had been told. The Boys Club. EML might have sat on that news for some time allowing 'friend and family' a steady stream of sells before RNS.

Climate change should represent an opportunity for WATR. In N Africa we have almost adjacent countries suffering worst droughts in decades, and others worst floods in history. Similarly with countries in Eu, States in USA. The long term problem is not lack of water, but water management. A major problem for all of us, is disinformation. Sunak has now drawn back on 'green' policies. GOP stateside is a GW denier, only because it is well funded by Big Oil. Forget the Planet, how big a swimming pool do I need. It's sickening.

Swazers. You and your deceitful amigo, Fraudanomoly at PHE are clowns. No matter what your 'charts' tell you, they do not take into account a RNS like yesterdays. I have told you countless times, that charts are ok for established cos. with trading profits and +ve cash flow, definitely not AIM shares , where the driving forces are RNS and sentiment. When it comes to both of these cos., I have been right, and you and fraud have been wrong. Smoke on that.

AEnergy, 'Very fact never been there are missing an entire country.'

I've put it through various 'translation' platforms, message reads 'incomprehensible'. Give us a clue.?

I realise English is not your native tongue, but better to post in your own language, and if the post heading is of sufficient interest we can use 'translate', or, you use translate to English, and then post. Thnx in advance.

It's incredulous that the RNS 1st para. tells us the flagship project is scrapped, and the next para. tells us what we could have won. To call the BOD idiots is unkind to genuine idiots.

Time for aandi to roll out his pipeline ( less one), and a few research notes.

DrAl. 'The amount of share is not an issue, if needed they can do a 1:100 to up the price...'

Of course the amount of shares is of paramount importance to the sp. All that a share consolidation of 100:1 does is decrease your holding 100:1, the cash amount remains the same. If there were 1B shares in issue, not 4B, and the Market Cap remained the same ( the MC is a valuation of the business), the sp would be 4x.

The market sees this company as a source of financial well being for its BOD. Before there can be any meaningful increase in sp, and a revaluation of PE, the company needs to start paying divis. The market sees this a someway off. AIMHO

Roadrunnr. FJ is a realist and posts facts. Aandi is a serial ramper, living, not on this Planet, who regurgitates nonsense every few days. ie pipelines, research notes. If investors ( I don't give any credence to investors decision making based on bb commentators, unless they are stupid), had followed FJ or A, have a guess who would be better off.

Not particularly good reading, and it's what was not reported makes the news. Not a glimmer of a mention of Protos Park. !

As for Riley going, doubt it's ill health as still being retained in another capacity. The 1st capacity didn't fare that well.. BOD's do not 'fire' fellow members, they are asked to resign for personal reasons. If it is ill health, wishing him all the best.

And now another deadline of Q1 '24 for Bridgend. Let us pray BOD do not find another 'partner', oops, or has it.

Aandii. Yep, I believe most people know half of Babars salary is taken as share options, however, that leaves him with a 'paltry' £150k. Wonder how he manages, and of course the perks and largesse of being on BOD. I don't know his age, but, as you are probably aware, pension contributions are allowed to increase with age as a %age of salary. How much do you think EQT (us S/Hs) is ploughing into his pension pot?

Goldbar; The sticking point is water, lack of it. When EML put forward plans for mine ( seems an eternity ago), dams were full, and seasonal rain was 'on time'. The last several years, the Kingdom, like many countries, has lacked rainfall in quantities. The EISA is a document that assesses what impact the mine has on local environment. It's all the name really. Since water is an obvious necessity to local, any development that might affect the local supply is going to have much scrutiny. I suggest PDMR's were very slow to react to this, and have only put forward alternative sources of water ( from waste water facilities) recently. Creating jobs is great for the local community, and will probably require labour influx to the area, hence exacerbating water problem. It seems my suggestion, of several months ago, to use sea water, and a desal. plant was a little too much to grasp for this incompetent BOD. The financial metrics of the mine are sustainable enough for a multi million $ investment in water, especially if excess water can be sold to local Water Boards. IMHO I think this project will have no resolution this year., it's only 4 months to go. Just hope it has sufficient cash to get through this time. A cash raise is an impossibility.

Just read mystic mats last post. 'When nothing makes sense etc'. Incompetence of BOD and failing to problem solve makes sense. Now mystic, make your mind up time, is it a fraud, or is it being primed for sale to OCP. Another few suggestions from you, and all possibilities will be covered. BTW it's 'you're party', not 'your party'