RE: Second question15 May 2023 15:01
The press seems to have it in for them.
I don’t think the press have it in for them, it is that Capita provided the press with a big target by not coming clean and they make money out of these stories (that’s their job) this is purely poor crisis management by the BOD.
What do people think? Is this a well managed company or have they just been selling off the family silver and are fundamentally not profitable enough to run the business.
Well as I have said a number of times this company is accident prone, the BOD over promises and under delivers, it is the same BOB and JL that raised far more in the rights issue than the company is worth after 5 years (not just the family silver sold off) of their so called recovery. The same BOB that stated in 2018 in the rights issues
Capita’s objective is to become a more focused and predictable, client-centric company, generating sustainable free cash flow of at least £200 million of sustainable annual, post-tax free cash flow in 2020
It is up to you to make up your own mind based. IMO my CPI shares will only be useful for capital losses and Capita is just a lift style choice for the BOB with lovely salaries and remuneration packages paid for by the shareholders with the only result is losing money, however I live in hope.
Now the rampers can have another attack on me but with a lot less ammunition after they said I was wrong when I stated there be is cost for the breach, it is now a fact! Only how much is up for discussion. Also I said there this likely to be issues with new contracts, was told I was wrong, seems that is coming true. Also been told I am shorting the shares (because I deal in facts not hope) and I am also someone else. Perhaps that can still stick to their line that history and past performance are unimportant. Let’s see what they can come up with this time, I am find these attacks quite amusing so bring it on.