Member Info for terrym

https://media.daimler.com/marsMediaSite/en/instance/ko.xhtml?oid=44572853&ls=L2VuL2luc3RhbmNlL2tvLnhodG1sP29pZD00ODM2MjU4JnJlbElkPTYwODI5JmZyb21PaWQ9NDgzNjI1OCZib3JkZXJzPXRydWUmcmVzdWx0SW5mb1R5cGVJZD00MDYyNiZ2aWV3VHlwZT10aHVtYnM!&rs=0

Or is it Panmure the ones with the short time crystal ball ??

Schlem

You got so excited you forgot to go out. Let’s hope it keeps going

It’s more exciting commentary than some footy games I listen too that’s for sure lol

Requirements for safe automation focus on the vehicle and the driver. While it is essential that the Automated Driving Systems (ADS) are highly capable when they are in control, the user must be able to safely take back control when needed.
https://www.automotiveworld.com/articles/all-eyes-on-the-road-towards-vision-zero/

Red Imo the words to look out for that I’d never heard of before is foveated rendering. Cenkos knows something to state.
This value would be seen not just but major chip & software platform suppliers like Intel but also the worlds tech giants

Red
The million Dollar Question. If you ask the guy that wrote the Cenkos article, why he suggests SEE might have more strategic value than Mobileye outside of transportation in things like, computers, personal robots, retail & medical in the real world that’s a bold statement.
Forget the current business model we have just upped to 12p these other sectors could make SEE more valuable than £3.63. If you track him down and ask for details of the discussion or any evidence that made him write that then give me a shout.

Earlier this year, rumors generated by patents submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office suggested that a wearable augmented reality device could potentially be in development at Apple. Among the applications was a patent for a mixed reality experience that included eye, gesture, and face tracking powered via a “head-mounted display.”

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/vrscout.com/news/ios13-update-hints-at-apple-ar-headset/amp/

There’s certainly a buzz. If google, Apple & Facebook have been trying to crack eye tracking and facial monitoring last few years and still haven’t it would make sense that just maybe one picked up the phone & dialed Australia for some help?

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/solrogers/2019/02/05/seven-reasons-why-eye-tracking-will-fundamentally-change-vr/amp/

All the big boys are after the holy grail
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.cultofmac.com/652810/apple-multi-user-eye-tracking-games-patent/amp/

Strange picture to use on a DMS company’s tweet?

Was it a clue?
https://mobile.twitter.com/seeingmachines/status/1024429629732515842

What are you looking at? How eye-tracking became tech’s new gold rush
‘The implications of eye tracking make the objections to facial recognition look almost trivial’

https://www.ft.com/content/2763d5ec-8c63-11e9-a24d-b42f641eca37

Facebook Exec: ‘Quest Is The End Of Our First Chapter Of VR. What’s Next Is Where Things Really Get Interesting’
For the kinds of resolution needed to support a wide field of view, foveated rendering will be needed.

The human eye is only high resolution in the very center, as you can notice by looking around your room. VR headsets can take advantage of this by only rendering where you’re directly looking in high resolution. Everything else can be rendered at a significantly lower resolution. This is called foveated rendering.

Eye tracking also allows for the lens distortion to be dynamically corrected based on the exact position of the user’s eye relative to the lens. This could allow for optical engineers to design lenses that are prone to varying (but predictable) distortion throughout the eyebox, which could enable wider field of view lenses.

Why it matters: Eye tracking will allow for headsets with much higher resolutions and a wider more immersive field of view.

https://uploadvr.com/facebook-jon-lax-next-gen-vr-quote/

https://research.fb.com/programs/the-2019-openeds-workshop-eye-tracking-for-vr-and-ar/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/solrogers/2019/02/05/seven-reasons-why-eye-tracking-will-fundamentally-change-vr/#35cfa5c83459

Schlem

How many did they buy in the offer? If bought more than 20 million then a nice £250-£300,000 profit if sold around mid 4s

I missed it? What min?
Also maybe these are the robots that Cenkos mentions?

https://media.gm.com/media/cn/en/gm/news.detail.html/content/Pages/news/cn/en/2019/Sep/0925-Cadillac-CT4.html

1.05 in explains the rendering/eye tracking issues

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIKD4ZYdunA

Google and facebook both bought eye tracking companies. If after 3 years they cant produce what they need, maybe they have reached out?

Cutting processing reduces costs, it reduces size of product. Look how big the goggles are atm. In research last night it seems they cant find 100% reliable & accurate eye tracking to make it work with the rendering side.

https://www.inc.com/bartie-scott/facebook-oculus-acquires-eye-tracking-startup-the-eye-tribe.html

https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/24/google-buys-eyefluence-eye-tracking-startup/