Member Info for TerrorWit

All anyone can say is that someone bought more shares. Anything more is pointless specualtion.

I eagerly await the day I visit this page to read someone admitting what they don't know but I guess honesty isn't a thing here.

You can troll me, misquote me, quote me out of context and make up as many stories as you like but everyone can see that you're just scumbags who can't take their losses like real men

It's easy to see who hyped it up. You only have to go back and read the forums from the period before the case settled.

The company was careful to give no estimates of the case value and so was Edison. Forum contributors just read what they wanted into the company's words and ignored BT's cautions altogether.

"With six months into process and a number of months in the data room most dd should have been complete by potential bidders. Indications of interest should then be narrowed down to acceptable and deliverable offers…so it could be down to one or two if any. There then is the transaction discussions on how an offer is formed which should really only take a matter of months before they get to a binding offer that can be announced with completion before the end of calendar year.

Obviously aware of MAR and when something has to be announced but agree with Smithy at this stage even if there is no indications of interest its debatable whether they extend that timeline until they have good news to soften the blow?? Maybe with FY end update ?

The share price is doing its usual during quiet periods and does not indicate to me that there is going to be a happy ending for shareholders through the sales process. If there was significant serious interest at anything like some have thought possible the shares wouldn’t be where they are in my view."

-----------

All complete guesswork and therefore meaningless twaddle.

As usual.

"The ceo has not promised any update on the sales process"

When the bidding in sale process ends the CEO will be obliged to update the market since it will be material information that he can't withhold. He was clear that bidding would be complete by the end of H2, which is on Monday, so I'm hopeful there will be news soon after. How vague or precise it might be is less certain given that he also said the final deal would take until around the end of the calendar year (or words to the same effect).

"Because posters on this board ask for context as to why the company is where it is, and your posts present a very distorted version."

-------

Anyone who wants can look back at all the rampy nonsense and wishful thinking that was posted in the run up to the Samsung settlement and how immediatley the settlement figure was announced the accusations began from of your dissonance. You'll all make excatlty the same mistakes again too since you haven't learned anything at all.

"We've been here before with all this claptrap."

So why do you keep on repeating it? Years after the events you just can't accept that you were wrong and you have to go on and on about how the company let you down when in truth is that :_

1. All Edison told us is what might have happened in different circumstances and nothing in the Edison document you've quoted gives any indication of what a fair legal settlement might turn out to be. You did your own sums on that and came up with inflated figures that plenty of people told you were ridiculous at the time.

2. Further, any damages award would be subject to appeals but especially a large award. If the company hadn't settled it would likely still be fighting and worthless

---------

My investment may or may not work out from here but if it doesn't I'll be solely responsible and I'm not going to spend years anonomously whining through my keyboard and damaging everyone else's work and investment in the stock by spreading toxic stories.

Bunch of big babies who shouldn't be in the markets at all.

"Quick! Quick! Change the subject, TerrorWit's telling it how it is and we don't like it."

------------------------

"That management were content to permit such figures to be bandied about by company sanctioned material was one of the major areas of criticism of the former CEO and Chairman"

Dribble.

A few investors on the forums extrapolated the Samsung sales figures given by Edison to such ridiculous levels that they would have beaten all records in patent cases. They then trebled them for willfullness even though there are no legal precendents. They were told repeatedly but didn't listen

Sensible investors, such as the institutions, knew this and having exactly the same information, sold down whilst idiots were still buying.

How can I be a troll for explaining why you should listen to the company's announcements instead of each others fantasies?

And you are obsessed with me. It all goes quiet unless I post and you mention me all the time even when I take extended breaks. I bet you can't keep quiet after this.

You're merely a tiny minority bunch of amatuers who took a punt and didn't listen. That's why, despite your protests, the BoD carried every vote since Samsung with overwhelming majorities.

But you guys never stop talking when you're underwater.

By the way did you know that some species of fish such as herrings communicate by farting

https://www.science.org/content/article/farting-fish-keep-touch

I was reminded of this by reading what you guys post.

"Ps. TerrorWit continues with his false narrative. The true picture is that the company misled its investors. It used the investor presentations to create false expectations of what any settlement would hold. This was only ever partially corrected, very late in the day with a murky RNS which left one to guess. Those who did not trust the company came off best."

----------------

The truth is that in a fit of avarice investors only heard what they wanted, didn't do any research, didn't understand the law and pumped each other into a frenzy before getting caught with their Y fronts round their ankles.

----------------

You're all obessesed with me because I try to tell you repeatedly at the time and you hated me for it.

Nanogeddon

It will be obvious to any readers who may be left that you're embitterred because you were one of many who relentlessely ramped the share price ahead of the Samsung hearing and you can't accept that you got it wrong. So tiresome.

I'm tentatively valuing LG vs Nano @ circa £10-£15m based on Edison' commentary and I'm assuming there's a 50% chance of success. That adds £5 -7.5m to the mCap less the time value of money so I think it's likely been in the price since news of the announcment settled in. Since there's a valid threat of injuction I anticipate a heavily discounted early settlement just before the hearing. It might come down to a few £million plus costs.

The next news, due before the end of the quarter, might contain the value of the bids within the CDX process. If so, I think this news will be more important.

It's just LG playing for time. Normal legal tactic.

Interesting in article in today’s Guardian about the use of “upscaling nanoparticles” in contact lenses. These enable the wearer to see not only in full colour but in infrared and might become a cure for colour blindness.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/may/22/infrared-contact-lenses-super-vision?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Apple pulled out because they elected to adopt lasers for their face recognition camera instead of QD sensors. You should be able to look this up. It wasn't anything to do with Edelman. How could it be when It's simply not possible that any individual could have made any difference?

Calling me names only goes to show how clueless you are

Here we go again. Armchair warriors casting stones.

Fact is that if Apple hadn't changed their minds Edelman would have been your hero.