Member Info for tennents

Haggis

Your comments suggest you know little about the engineering industry, how it works and how it thinks.

The web pages are riven with errors and poor quality writing, page after page after page.

That evidences a wholesale failure in, or complete absence of, a functioning quality management process in a business.

That, Mr Haggis is something engineers care a very great deal about when looking at a business with a potential to purchase something.

Anne

The random capitalisation is just one of a (large) number of writing and style errors.

The site looks very good, the structure works well but the fine detail in the text let’s it down badly. An hour of work by someone who knows what they are doing would improve it it significantly.

Anticipating ‘what difference does it make’ comments….

Well it does which because it:

- evidences a lack of attention to detail. ( Do we also do that in our engineering?)
- dilutes the strength of the technical and customer benefits being set out. (Why would you want to understate our best marketing case?)
- reduces the readers ‘first thirty seconds’ impact. (Why would we want to add risk of a less than best first impression from potential customers?)

As I said, it would take an hour for a decent editor to fix.

No it won’t. Strategic importance and Golden Share.

That is not to say that RR do not need some impetus……..

I am sure the planning for the shift has been going on, but given the volatility since Jan FEB I am sure they are sitting on their hands until there is some more stability in the market. Now is not the time for such a big move....even if it is to get out of AIMs casino.

With a Cambridge double first in history and classics it is all Greek to him.

Toneman

Get a grip and bin the clown from Kent who is just taking the ****.

The halfwit thinks oil grows on trees and is therefore environmentally friendly.

A bad day because US inflation data is crap. Suck it up and remember why you invested here.

Have the basics changed - was climate changed resolved yesterday - is oil and gas our new future ?

No thought not.........

If early stage Henry Ford had done market research his customers would have asked for….

Faster horses.

Stupid is. As stupid is.

I guess you have no education, particularly in geography.

China and India share the problems of:

- Large and densely populated coastlines - threatened with wholesale destruction by rising sea levels
- huge interior areas that both provide most of their agricultural areas and domestic food production - being destroyed and are further threatened by significant reduction in rainfall
- have growing areas of rising temperatures ie closing on 50C where human habitation is no longer possible

You could be right and these governments are completely stupid and are ignoring climate change. Alternatively perhaps they are quite smart and are spending massive amounts on investments in green energy production.

Russia - well who cares. China and India need oil short term until their green capacity is in full production and will screw Russia over on oil price until they do not need it any more.

Your lack of education and analytical thinking capacity is appalling.

At 9.54 this morning I said that the institutional shorter was going to make a great deal of money today.

And so they have - if they closed out.
Perhaps they think it will go lower, who knows but today made them a load of cash ( on top of that already made) so perhaps they will take their profit and close. Perhaps they will not.

Who can say (other than them of course) but you don’t get a 17% drop very often.

Has the world changed today ?
Did the Ukrainian conflict not happen ?
Is The European energy economy no longer at huge risk?
Has global warming and the CO2 problem gone away?
Is the world wide rush to green energy no longer happening - did it stop (and reverse) this morning?

Don’t think so.

Our shorter made quite a lot of £
People who sold out lost some £
People still here - have seen it before and have not lost any £

Perhaps 250 was also their bottom target, already 257 as I type.

Matt

Because we have very expert company shorting ITM. That know exactly what they are doing and I have no doubt they were rubbing their hands before today’s statement was published.

They are making a great deal of money today and driving some weary holders to sell. They will have a target bottom where they will pocket their profit and flip to holders for the rise.

As you say the performance numbers and developments are in the right direction.

I agree it is not a massive trade but……….it is by far the biggest I have seen in quite along time.

Let’s call it a hint of a positive indicator. might even be the short trades exiting or just some one who sees potential value after our substantial recent decline.

Interesting indeed. What is the operational and financial impact of having to displace 4 tonnes of cargo load on
- every vehicle for
- every day that it operates
- over its 7-10 year life.

That is one very large pile of cargo that a second vehicle is going to have to carry, and be paid for.

We have heard a lot from

- (many) of the technology advocates - pro and con
- (some) of the truck manufacturers
- (close to none) of the large fleet operators whose operational economics will drive the
purchase decisions.

This story has just started and the really big voices have yet to be heard.

Sorry 100k shares not pounds.

£100k purchase at 16.19. Not a common sight for some time.

Could be short closing. This level of uncertainty is not what they are betting against. Take their profit and gtf out of Dodge.

The local objections are similar to those lodged in the Scottish Power Whitelees electrolyser planning application.

This is going to happen on a regular basis until these facilities becomes commonplace.

Jzchat. The RBC target is raised to 500p.

Excellent news. Should support the price recovery.