Member Info for swazers

@red_Hornet, you're attempting to mislead PHE investors again.

National H2 (NH2) has already paid over £350,000 to Engsolve for a FEED contract in Western Australia. That is a formal engineering engagement, not speculation. You don’t hand over that kind of capital unless you’re advancing a real project. FEED is not a wishlist item — it’s the precondition to securing full EPC, financing, and approvals. That work was tied to a deployment of Powerhouse Energy’s DMG® technology. It’s happening, not hypothetical.

Let’s talk approvals. NH2 is working within the Western Australian regulatory framework, and FEED enables the very approval pathways you’re asking about. No FEED, no approvals. It’s that simple. That work is already underway, and it's part of a larger structured rollout — not a punt.

And cash? Come on. NH2 is a core holding of NEO (formerly UHL), which is preparing for a November IPO on the ASX. They've published a verified $82.6 million portfolio valuation, confirmed by HLB Mann Judd. The IPO includes two major acquisitions — a Battery Giga Factory and an EV Charging Network — forecast to generate $156 million in revenue and $47 million EBITDA by FY28. NH2 is central to that clean tech growth plan. This isn't a back-of-napkin startup; it's a funded play embedded in a broader ecosystem with a commercial roadmap.

Your attempt to suggest NH2 “aren’t commercial” ignores the reality of funded FEED, formal engineering contracts, and a verified ownership structure backed by one of Australia’s most recognised accounting firms. That’s not “early-stage chatter” — that’s the framework of commercial execution.

You might not like the progress being made, but denying it doesn’t erase it. HUI rampers like yourself love to downplay hard facts when they don’t suit your narrative. But the commercial wheel is turning — and Powerhouse Energy is already locked in the gearbox.

There’s a crucial chain of activity now aligning around Powerhouse Energy, and it’s time to present it clearly.

National H2, a waste-to-energy developer, is a key holding within NEO (formerly known as UHL), which is preparing for an IPO on the Australian Stock Exchange this November. This isn’t hearsay or vague ambition — NEO has issued a detailed investor presentation confirming NH2’s position within its clean energy portfolio. They’re projecting over $500 million in group revenue across their holdings, and NH2 plays a central role in that. One of their flagship projects? The plastic-to-hydrogen model that directly aligns with Powerhouse Energy’s DMG technology.

What’s significant here is the engineering validation. NH2 has already paid £350,000 to Engsolve, Powerhouse’s engineering arm, to complete a Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) study for a DMG deployment site in Western Australia. That’s a hard contract, not a vague letter of interest. It signals intent, execution, and funded work. Engsolve doesn’t take these on lightly — and they’ve delivered it.

Engsolve, for those who may not be fully familiar, is no junior consultancy. They’ve engineered, procured, and constructed the Feedstock Testing Unit in South Wales. They’ve handled HAZOP and SIL studies for £100 million oil and gas projects. They’ve represented clients in the North Sea on flow accounting audits and acted as technical advisors for energy-from-waste deployments across the UK and Europe. Their role is about risk reduction, engineering assurance, and technical execution. And they’re building the technical backbone of Powerhouse’s DMG roadmap.

So here’s the commercial chain that trolls won’t talk about. Powerhouse has built the technology. Engsolve has commissioned and validated it. NH2 is now deploying it, starting with Western Australia. And the parent entity, NEO, is about to IPO with a fully costed clean energy portfolio. This isn’t speculative. It’s funded, engineered, and tied to companies with serious balance sheet ambitions.

This is where the narrative has shifted. We’re not in the world of hopeful promises anymore. We’re in the world of structured debt finance, commercial clients, and exportable infrastructure. Trolls can argue about share price minutiae, but they cannot argue against executed engineering, validated designs, and active procurement strategies with global implications.

Powerhouse is moving. Quietly, but unmistakably.

Https://vimeo.com/1096826373?share=copy

Let’s bring some clarity and rigour to the discussion — because the recent attempts at misdirection and gaslighting around Powerhouse Energy (PHE) and its strategic partner National H2 are borderline absurd.

First, understand what you're dealing with here: National H2 is not a fringe operator — it’s a core investee of NEO (formerly United H2 Limited), a pre-IPO clean energy investment group with a portfolio independently valued at $82.6 million by HLB Mann Judd, one of Australia’s leading advisory firms. NEO’s pipeline spans battery manufacturing, hydrogen mobility, waste-to-energy, and green data centres, with projected revenues of $500 million+ over the next five years. That’s not hype. That’s DCF-verified data.

📌 NEO’s stake in National H2: $4.9 million | 57.3% ownership. N2H is described as a "plastic-to-energy" pioneer. That’s PHE’s technology. This is a strategic investment at the portfolio level, not a punt. 📌 IPO and Infrastructure Expansion. NEO has announced an IPO for November 2025 on the ASX, backed by cornerstone acquisitions including a battery giga-factory and a nationwide EV charging network, forecast to deliver $47 million EBITDA by FY28.

In Will Davidson’s own words, NEO’s value lies in proximity to revenue and its ability to scale proven clean-tech solutions.

And here’s the part trolls desperately avoid: PHE’s FTU is already built and commissioned in South Wales. Engsolve’s case studies make it clear:

Engsolve aren’t lightweights. They’ve handled FEED design, EPC delivery, HAZOP, and audit work for oil majors across the North Sea and many other projects. If they’re in and they’ve risk-assessed the design through full HAZOP, DSEAR and HAC compliance, then you can bet it’s passed every serious hurdle.

🔥 Strategic Alignment You Won’t Hear from the Trolls. Let’s put this out clearly — Powerhouse Energy (PHE) is no longer in conceptual limbo. The company has crossed the line into commercial execution — and key counterparties are now being identified through hard contracts and funded engineering work. National H2 (NH2) — a 57.3% holding of NEO (formerly UHL), soon to IPO on the ASX in November 2025. What’s their description? “Plastic-to-Energy.” What’s the tech being deployed? That would be DMG® from PHE.

Https://engsolve.com/case-studies/hazop-representation-for-confidential-oil-and-gas-client/

🛡️ Safety Isn’t a Buzzword — It’s a Core Competence: Engsolve & North Sea Process Excellence.

Let’s address the ongoing misinformation that attempts to undermine the credentials of Powerhouse Energy’s engineering division, Engsolve. The reality? Engsolve isn’t just talking about clean energy — it’s actively embedded in the heart of some of the most critical safety assessments within the UK oil and gas sector.

A confidential client undertaking a >£100 million upgrade to their North Sea stabilisation facility needed more than a checkbox exercise. They needed rigorous technical evaluation during their HAZOP and SIL studies — not just to meet compliance, but to ensure that their safety and operability were bulletproof. Who did they turn to? Engsolve.

Why? Because when process safety is under the microscope, only the best are invited into the room. Engsolve’s independent engineering representative brought deep process understanding, clear risk analysis, and years of practical experience. This wasn’t theory — this was live design evaluation, interfacing with global vendors, EPCs, and internal engineering teams in a high-stakes, deadline-driven environment.

Engsolve’s role was pivotal: guiding critical safety reviews, asking the questions others missed, and ensuring every decision met operational and regulatory integrity. In short, they helped de-risk a major multi-national infrastructure build from the inside out.

So when someone asks whether PHE’s Engsolve is "ready for prime time" — this is the answer. Engsolve isn’t learning safety; it’s leading it. In oil & gas, in waste-to-energy, and across the entire clean-tech transformation.

The future is being engineered with safety, credibility, and commercial scale in mind — and Engsolve is already operating at the highest level.

Https://engsolve.com/case-studies/audit-for-confidential-oil-and-gas-client/

📌 Engsolve: Real-World Audit Power in Complex Energy Environments.

Let’s put something straight for those who claim Powerhouse Energy and its engineering arm Engsolve are “unproven” or somehow not capable of delivering at scale. That’s laughable when you look at what’s actually been achieved.

Engsolve was specifically engaged by a top-tier European oil & gas major to serve as the technical and engineering representative during a full audit of shared North Sea offshore assets — a high-stakes, high-complexity environment where precision, integrity, and strategic awareness are paramount.

This wasn’t a design study or backroom advisory gig. It was hands-on: flow accounting audits, metering integrity verification, and deep scrutiny of multi-operator, multi-country upstream infrastructure. Engsolve challenged technical assumptions, verified allocation models, corrected discrepancies, and — crucially — ensured the client was financially compensated where previously they were being shortchanged.

And the outcome? A material financial benefit for the client and improved leverage for future commercial negotiations. Engsolve didn’t just participate — they led with independence, clarity, and cross-disciplinary strength.

What does this mean for PHE? It means that the same team building and scaling FTU and DMG technology is already proven in some of the most challenging and regulated environments in global energy. It underscores that when clients — from Norway to the UK to Australia — ask, “Can these engineers deliver?”, the answer is documented and independently validated: yes, they already have.

Engsolve isn’t just supporting PHE’s evolution. It’s de-risking it, validating it, and already generating revenue from complex international projects. The foundation is real. The talent is proven. And the trolls? They’re playing catch-up.

@Patxaran @red_hornet @testpack3 WOW!!! The terror of PHE moving back up absolutely terrifies you. Your agenda is so clear to anyone with the eyes to see. Newsflash!! You will not stop this company's progress. You've had your day at deramping the price for your bosses. Those days are over.

@WordSpaghetti Let’s cut through the cheerleading and look at the cold, hard facts.

HUI’s rampers can paint a rosy picture, but the company’s latest financials speak volumes — and it’s not good. The 2024 full-year accounts showed revenue of just £499k. Operating losses totalled £4.7 million, excluding a £2.3 million goodwill impairment. Cash on hand? £1.31 million — down significantly from £4.34m in 2023. That’s a burn rate that leaves barely any runway.

And we’re now hearing about “adding more” and “over 1 million shares” as if that’s a sign of confidence. It’s not. The same ramping language was used prior to the last placing — just before the price tanked. All while HUI insiders continue to delay delivery on core fundamentals like commercial traction or scalable technology deployment.

The MENA deal referenced is speculative at best — “up to 2 ½ months” is vague to the point of being meaningless. There is no binding timetable. No capex strategy. And crucially, no technical validation with any revenue-generating deployment.

The OO (Open Offer) remains an unresolved mystery, yet that hasn't stopped a parade of dilution. Talk of “LSEG delays” is little more than a smokescreen — the reality is, no one has shown the market a coherent valuation or asset profile that underpins the 49 million shares mentioned.

This isn’t transparency. This is distraction.

Compare this to other companies actually building and commissioning real-world, tested energy-from-waste plants — companies that have tangible IP, global patents, live testing units, and active customer pipelines. HUI, on the other hand, remains locked in a cycle of vague announcements, poor execution, and delayed milestones.

The bottom line: until there’s real commercial revenue, a validated process, and a transparent financial path forward — this remains speculative fluff wrapped in vague timelines and ramp posts. Serious investors deserve better than recycled platitudes and “green box” deflection.

Https://www.tradingview.com/x/P30EfSBU/

@Leeawill27 The FCA won't sign it off. https://www.tradingview.com/x/PcbBocYF/

Https://www.tradingview.com/x/3BKYAU0D/ Mind the gap!!!

Https://engsolve.com/case-studies/design-engineer-procure-and-construct-waste-to-energy-demonstration-plant/

The company’s South Wales-based Waste to Energy Demonstration Plant — also known as the Feedstock Testing Unit (FTU) — is no longer an idea on a slide deck. It’s operational, engineered, built, tested, and now commissioned. And critically, it was designed, procured, and constructed under the guidance of Engsolve, PHE’s wholly owned engineering consultancy.

Let’s be clear — this isn’t a lab experiment. It’s an industrial-scale, real-world deployment of the company’s proprietary Distributed Modular Generation (DMG®) technology.

From process flow diagrams to piping schematics, heat and mass balances to equipment schedules, every layer of engineering was professionally developed, audited, and executed to meet the most stringent safety and compliance requirements — including full DSEAR and HAC reviews. Engsolve didn’t just design this — they owned the delivery from end to end.

Procurement was global. The safety reviews were world-class. Construction and commissioning were executed to exacting standards. And the result? A plug-and-play, 2.5 tonne-per-day working platform that is now: – Validating waste streams for commercial clients

– Providing tangible data outputs for hydrogen and syngas– Acting as a showpiece to close deals across the UK and internationally– Generating inbound demand post-CMD from real, funded prospects.

No hypothetical modelling. No deskbound theorising. This plant delivers data, performance, and credibility. In short, PHE is no longer just a technology story — it is now a delivered hardware story, and the FTU is the proof. It represents years of IP development brought to life in metal, monitored 24/7, and tuned for commercial engagement. This is what true engineering progress looks like. And the market is finally starting to catch up.

Https://engsolve.com/case-studies/confidential-energy-from-waste-site-developer/

Engsolve's Work with European EfW Developer Shows Serious Market Positioning. Here’s what’s happening behind the scenes — and why it matters.

A major European developer working on Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF) energy-from-waste projects has brought in Engsolve, the engineering arm of Powerhouse Energy (PHE), to guide them from the ground up.

This isn’t just a support gig — Engsolve was tasked with full-spectrum technical advisory, starting from technology selection all the way through to site design and investor support. Engsolve did the following: Assessed every viable gasification technology on the market for suitability with RDF. Shortlisted the best options through a structured, data-led screening process. Led feasibility design work for multiple deployment sites. Created conceptual layouts for how this technology could be scaled nationally. Supported investor presentations, tech reviews, and site evaluations.

This is what real influence looks like. But why does it matter to PHE investors?

Because this kind of role gives Engsolve a front-line view of how large-scale gasification is being deployed in Europe — and more importantly, shows how PHE’s own DMG technology can slot into this exact market.

This project is a blueprint for how Powerhouse can deliver more than just kit — it can deliver trust, engineering assurance, and technical clarity to serious developers across the UK and Europe.

As PHE now begins to market its 2.5 TPD DMG units, Engsolve’s growing track record proves it can deliver at scale. The result? PHE isn’t just trying to sell tech. It’s already shaping the design, delivery, and execution of waste-to-energy infrastructure — and that’s a huge advantage when closing commercial deals. This is how credibility is built — one well-executed project at a time.

Engsolve’s Growing Role Behind UK Plastics-to-Energy Projects – Why It Matters to PHE.

Engsolve, the wholly-owned engineering arm of Powerhouse Energy (PHE), is now embedded at the heart of multiple UK energy-from-waste projects. These aren’t back-of-a-napkin ideas — these are live developments across the country, focused on converting hard-to-handle waste, including plastics, into electricity and heat.

Engsolve’s client is a UK-based developer rolling out sites that use waste to power local grids and district heating. And who’s overseeing the technical side? Engsolve. They’ve been hired as technical advisor and Owner’s Engineer — which means they’re responsible for validating the technology, assessing vendor claims, verifying site feasibility, and guiding the project from planning all the way through to build and commissioning.

This gives PHE two things: A front-row seat at the investment table — where decisions are made, not just discussed. A growing revenue stream from engineering services that builds trust and visibility with both developers and investors.

The client wants Engsolve involved throughout the full lifecycle of the project — from concept to commissioning. That’s not a support act. That’s central.

The connection to PHE is crystal clear: the more credibility Engsolve earns in waste-to-energy delivery, the more doors open for the DMG technology. It’s a smart way to build real-world proof, real-world relationships, and real-world revenues while positioning for future tech deployments.

Bottom line: Engsolve isn’t just providing consulting — it’s influencing the direction of UK EfW projects at ground level. That makes PHE much more than a tech company. It makes them a player in delivery.

And as the FTU proves itself further and more DMG discussions move forward, this kind of track record from Engsolve is exactly what gives commercial buyers and financiers confidence.

Https://engsolve.com/case-studies/plastics-to-oil-client-energy-from-waste-projects-development/

Overview. A developer of Energy from Waste (EfW) facilities engaged Engsolve to provide comprehensive technical support for a Syngas power generation initiative from Refuse Derived Fuel. The project progressed from technology assessment to facility design and long-term technical advisory.

Description of Services

The project began with a detailed communication with the client and all parties, to understand their expectations, performance criteria, commercial goals, and various constraints. The primary objective was to assess and identify suitable gasification technologies capable of processing Refuse Derived Fuel, followed by feasibility design work for several proposed sites.

With this framework in place, Engsolve conducted an extensive review of existing gasification technologies, collecting both technical specifications and commercial data. A structured screening process was carried out to evaluate each technology’s efficiency, scalability, and alignment with the specific requirements of the clients.

Once the most viable gasification of Refuse Derived Fuel technologies were shortlisted, Engsolve collaborated closely with the client to identify a preferred vendor. This collaborative approach ensured that the selected solution balanced technical feasibility with long-term commercial viability.

To support future development stages, Engsolve produced feasibility and conceptual designs site layouts for multiple locations. These designs gave the client a practical understanding of how the chosen technology could be implemented across various sites in the future.

As the project evolved, Engsolve’s role expanded to that of technical advisor, supporting the client during site assessments and investor engagements. Engsolve’s deep technical knowledge and structured delivery approach helped nullify early project risks and allowed for the project to be executed successfully.

Https://engsolve.com/case-studies/client-representation-for-feed-design-powerhouse-energy-group/

🌍 Serious Engineering. Serious Progress. PHE’s FEED Project with Engsolve Sets the Benchmark. When people talk about Powerhouse Energy (PHE) “moving forward,” this is exactly what they mean — not wishful headlines, but boots-on-the-ground engineering delivery from one of the UK’s most trusted firms in waste-to-energy deployment: Engsolve Ltd.

✅ A Commercial-Grade FEED Programme, Delivered. This wasn’t theoretical. Engsolve was retained to act as the client-side engineering representative for PHE during a complex Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) phase for a full-scale waste-to-energy plant in the Midlands — a project centred around advanced thermal conversion technology capable of turning non-recyclable waste into sustainable energy.

This is a live, commercially scoped facility aligned with the UK's circular economy ambitions and landfill-reduction mandates. Not a trial. Not a pilot. This is full-steam-ahead infrastructure.

✅ A Commercial-Grade FEED Programme, Delivered. This wasn’t theoretical. Engsolve was retained to act as the client-side engineering representative for PHE during a complex Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) phase for a full-scale waste-to-energy plant in the Midlands — a project centred around advanced thermal conversion technology capable of turning non-recyclable waste into sustainable energy.

This is a live, commercially scoped facility aligned with the UK's circular economy ambitions and landfill-reduction mandates. Not a trial. Not a pilot. This is full-steam-ahead infrastructure.

🔍 Mitigating Risk Before Construction. FEED isn’t just about blueprints — it’s about de-risking the next phase: construction. With Engsolve scrutinising every inch of technical output, PHE now stands on a solid foundation to move ahead with confidence and credibility — essential in a sector where delivery means everything.

💼 A Trusted Engineering Arm, Not Just a Partner. This is a reminder of Engsolve’s dual function: As a profitable subsidiary actively delivering commercial services, and as a strategic guardian of technical standards and design integrity for PHE.

The narrative here is clear: PHE is not waiting for the future. It’s building it. And it's doing so with the right partners, the right process, and professional-grade execution.

📌 For those questioning where the progress is — it’s here. It’s technical. It’s validated. And it’s happening.

@jancux01 The only pain and confusion is created by yourself and your pals. Stop pretending to be an actual investor; we both know that you are not.

The claim by @red_hornet that HUI’s director shareholding offers protection or incentive to drive value for ordinary shareholders doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. Yes, Aleksandra Binkowska reportedly holds 163,161,041 shares, equating to roughly 40.81%. But this isn't new — her holding has been at that level for well over a year with no associated delivery of commercial operations or revenue-generating infrastructure. Similarly, Steven Giles at 18.51% and Conrad Griffiths at 9.09% bring the insider control above 68%, and yet the track record remains unchanged: numerous fundraises, no functioning plant, and no industrial partner ready to deploy the tech at scale. Howard White — often portrayed as the visionary behind HUI — holds just over 4.2%, far from a controlling or transformative stake, and notably silent when it comes to tangible commercial outcomes.

Here’s the real issue: shareholding percentages do not equate to value creation. We’ve seen time and again that insider-heavy boards can suppress progress by resisting external input, failing to attract institutional partners, and relying on continual dilution of the public float. The 73.19% insider control described in this post is not reassuring — it isolates the company from capital market discipline.

Compare that to Powerhouse Energy (PHE), where the model is transitioning toward structured, third-party project financing rather than equity dilution. The Ballymena project is being developed under a Design, Build, Operate/Sell framework, with hydrogen offtake and feedstock already identified, without burdening shareholders with capital calls. Moreover, PHE’s 2.5TPD unit is now saleable, replicable, and verified via the Feedstock Testing Unit (FTU), offering a true plug-and-play model, not theoretical promises. This is what serious progress looks like.

Until HUI can show even one built-and-commissioned site, these posts amount to little more than misdirection. Focus on delivery, not declarations.

A concentration of insider ownership doesn’t automatically equate to shareholder alignment, especially in companies where execution has lagged for years. The dilution record and delivery void at HUI speak far louder than any shareholding stat. Investors should demand results, not spreadsheets. If nearly 75% of the company is in the hands of a few, and progress still stalls, the issue isn’t ownership — it’s accountability.”

It’s increasingly transparent that certain posters are trying to prop up sentiment around HUI under the guise of 'balanced commentary' — but the truth is, the questions you’re raising don’t hold up under scrutiny.

First, the notion that the recent raise was due to desperation or some kind of backroom favour deal doesn’t reflect operational facts. If anything, it raises a red flag about the credibility of HUI's current standing. If the OO deal is “imminent,” why dilute? Because the optimism doesn’t match the delivery, it rarely does with this outfit.

Second, HUI has long relied on announcements, speculative jurisdictions, and personality-driven PR without a proven tech pathway of its own. Let’s not forget: HUI has no IP of its own, no in-house engineering division like Engsolve, and no functioning FTU equivalent in deployment or test. It’s a license narrative, built around external tech, with unclear revenue timelines.

Third, you mention being “very hopeful” — but hope isn’t a strategy. Investors deserve facts. And factually, the only progress consistently coming from this space is via Powerhouse Energy, not HUI. The FTU is operational. The 2.5TPD units are being packaged and marketed as a product. PHE is now deploying structured debt models — not chasing AIM dilutions.

If people want to support clean hydrogen, they should focus on companies doing the engineering, not recycling news and playing the crowd.

Really? https://www.tradingview.com/x/hNYMcrep/

"Know them by their fruits". HUI's daily chart is nearly back to the pre-P&D levels. https://www.tradingview.com/x/Vz66uSLf/