Member Info for Suzy2

Geovanni....it means nothing. If you think ADF is right then you were a fool to buy 60K of these in November, .because he thinks the Green Party can stop this mine. I think they've done their worst already but the law is on our side.

sometimes you sound English and sometimes not.

It was a No based on nothing concrete *indiect effects* and their Business Department found in favour of mining against reindeer herding as being of greater economic benefit to the County. They have found nothing they could oppose on environmental grounds. The Minister has also dismissed calls for UNESCO to be involved, saying "the law is enough". And there is growing support in the North which can only strength with the news that LKAB have less iron than projected. And the Bergsstaten has said yes now, twice and they should know the rules. Last but not least, who are you

Andy...the law might have something to say about that and the Green party with it's 4.4% doesn't get to change the law.

A new Pelletising Plant, we'd have a use for that.

Thanks Geovanni...looks like this is the new game. Will L+C+MP?

Thanks Martina...you're much better at sums than me...I'll take that for some of my shares and I'll keep the rest. :-)

Looks like the end is in sight.....Mr Lofven has a clear lead from the electorate as leader with 28.3% against his nearest rival's 19..8%...the bloc system just obfusticates the matter and makes for a weak government, they should scrap it. And he could dump the Greens.

Good morning gentlemen.

Has abandoned her bid to break Sweden's political deadlock.

Now you've got it. :-)

Don't know anything about Ystad but sunrise certainly over Jokkmokk.

Thanks Felldown, good stuff, I'll read that later.

How's Annie getting on...it's Thursday, her day of judgement has arrived.

Yes, Treetop, exactly that...patience. x

A rainbow of resources. Thanks Kurt, well done.

Very well said Ed, that's just how it is in the real world. Bobtree, there is no NOW is the litigation process. Ibjj. Go away!

Watches and waits.

The party to lose support in another election is most likely to be The Moderates, because the moderates who voted for them are moderate and might feel betrayed at their party's willingness to tango with the not moderates. The Social Democrats don't stand to lose any votes in that analysis because they have done what they said they would do, no deal. So, if moderates defect to another party which one would it be? Food for thought....will it be the kind eyes party?

I don't like him either, Treetop, I;ll have to vote for the flying worm party. Lol

North and South, East and West, Male and Female....it's a good working principle, gets things done.

Is not the point....I do have a representative in parliament and he probably wont ask me if I voted for him if I want him to represent me in some way. See, I always look on the bright side. :-)

Yes, Andy, I expect she will.

Pocko, yes, some votes are worth nothing...my vote is worth nothing because I live in a very safe Tory seat.

Democracy has to have a system, it can't work on a one man one vote principle, it has to be more sophisticated than that and that is why referendums are bad and the one we just had wasn't worked out properly. There are at least three important questions not just in or out and most people are not sufficiently in possession of the facts to answer any of them.